Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

compliance-policy-check合规政策检查

Agent Skill

compliance-policy-check 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,274

周安装

50

GitHub Stars

25

下载量

470
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:compliance-policy-check(合规政策检查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio
仓库路径:skills/compliance-policy-check
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill compliance-policy-check
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill compliance-policy-check

简介

compliance-policy-check 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 它用于在设计或计划执行前评估是否符合框架策略与规则约束,适用于高风险变更场景。
  • 使用时需结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法,安装前应确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写时,需评估安全风险并确保操作边界清晰。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Compliance Policy Check

Overview

Evaluate a design/plan against framework policy and rule constraints before execution. Use this for regulated or high-risk changes.

When to Use

  • Before creator workflows for new artifacts
  • Before HIGH/EPIC implementation phases
  • During reflection when repeated policy violations are observed

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER execute or modify code during compliance checks — this skill assesses policy alignment only; any implementation must happen separately after compliance is confirmed.
  2. ALWAYS run compliance check before HIGH/EPIC implementation — high-risk changes that bypass compliance checks create undetected policy drift that compounds over time into systemic violations.
  3. ALWAYS report findings with specific remediation tasks and owning agent — vague "policy violation" reports without actionable remediation steps don't produce fixes; every FAIL and CONDITIONAL must include a concrete task.
  4. NEVER report PASS on partial compliance — a plan that satisfies 80% of policies is a CONDITIONAL, not a PASS; partial compliance masks the remaining violations and gives false confidence.
  5. ALWAYS recheck after remediation, not just once — a single compliance check before implementation is insufficient; verify again after major changes to confirm remediations are complete.

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Policy Context

  • Read relevant files in .claude/rules/
  • Read applicable workflow/agent constraints
  • Read enforcement hook docs if needed

Step 2: Evaluate Proposed Change

Assess against:

  1. Creator guard and artifact lifecycle rules
  2. Routing and specialist-first requirements
  3. Security and quality gate requirements
  4. Memory/search/token-saver policy expectations

Step 3: Produce Decision

Return one policy decision:

  • PASS: policy-aligned
  • CONDITIONAL: allowed with required mitigations
  • FAIL: not policy-compliant

Use this output shape:

{
  "decision": "PASS|CONDITIONAL|FAIL",
  "policyFindings": ["..."],
  "requiredMitigations": [],
  "evidencePaths": ["..."],
  "recommendedNextStep": "..."
}

Output Protocol

For CONDITIONAL and FAIL, include precise remediation tasks and ownership (agent type).

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Implementing code during compliance checkConflates assessment with implementationAssess only; implementation happens separately after PASS
Skipping compliance for "small" changesSmall changes introduce policy violations silentlyRun compliance check proportionally for all HIGH/EPIC work
Reporting PASS on partial complianceMasks unresolved violations; gives false confidenceReport CONDITIONAL with specific remediation required
Vague violation reports without remediationViolations aren't fixed without clear next stepsInclude agent, task, and target file for every FAIL/CONDITIONAL
Only checking once before implementationPost-change compliance drift goes undetectedRecheck compliance after major implementation changes

Memory Protocol

Record recurring policy drift patterns in .claude/context/memory/issues.md and stabilized controls in .claude/context/memory/decisions.md.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.09%
按下载量换算170

Claude

32.46%
按下载量换算153

Cursor

18.35%
按下载量换算86

Gemini CLI

9.69%
按下载量换算46

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills