Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

competitive-strategist竞争战略家

Agent Skill

competitive-strategist 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,663

周安装

70

GitHub Stars

18

下载量

582
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-strategist(竞争战略家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills
仓库路径:skills/competitive-strategist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist

简介

提供系统化的竞争情报分析与战略指导,涵盖研究方法和销售支持全流程。

  • 聚焦客户真实需求而非单纯模仿对手,强调诚实定位与快速响应能力。
  • 结合行业基准与实战案例输出定制化策略方案,避免无效对标陷阱。
  • 要求输入自身产品特点、受众画像及定价模型作为分析基础条件。
  • competitive-strategist 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Competitive Strategist

Expert competitive intelligence and positioning guidance for winning in crowded markets — from research methodologies to sales enablement and everything in between.

Philosophy

Competitive strategy isn't about copying competitors or tearing them down:

  1. Know yourself first — You can't position against others until you know your own strengths
  2. Focus on customers, not competitors — What they need matters more than what rivals do
  3. Be honest — Lies and FUD destroy credibility faster than any competitor
  4. Stay current — Markets move fast; stale intel costs deals

How This Skill Works

When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:

  • research-* — Competitive research methodologies and intelligence gathering
  • analysis-* — Win/loss analysis and market landscape mapping
  • battlecard-* — Battlecard creation, structure, and maintenance
  • positioning-* — Positioning against alternatives and differentiation
  • messaging-* — Competitive messaging and objection handling
  • enablement-* — Sales enablement for competitive situations
  • monitoring-* — Competitive monitoring systems and alerts

Core Frameworks

The Competitive Intelligence Cycle

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│   ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐             │
│   │  GATHER  │───▶│ ANALYZE  │───▶│  SHARE   │             │
│   │  (Intel) │    │ (Insight)│    │ (Enable) │             │
│   └──────────┘    └──────────┘    └──────────┘             │
│        ▲                                │                   │
│        │          ┌──────────┐          │                   │
│        └──────────│  UPDATE  │◀─────────┘                   │
│                   │ (Iterate)│                              │
│                   └──────────┘                              │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Competitive Positioning Matrix

Positioning TypeWhen to UseKey Approach
Head-to-headYou're stronger on key dimensionsDirect comparison
Niche downCompetitor owns general categoryOwn a specific segment
ReframeCompetitor's strength is irrelevantChange the criteria
LeapfrogNew capability they can't matchFuture-oriented vision
CoexistDifferent jobs to be doneComplement, don't compete

Competitor Tiers

TierDescriptionMonitoring FrequencyDepth of Analysis
PrimaryDirect competitors, same ICPWeeklyDeep battlecards
SecondaryAdjacent solutions, partial overlapMonthlyOverview cards
EmergingStartups, potential disruptorsQuarterlyWatch list
AlternativesStatus quo, DIY, spreadsheetsOngoingPain point mapping

Win/Loss Analysis Framework

Deal Outcome
    │
    ├── Won Against Competitor
    │   ├── What differentiated us?
    │   ├── What did they say about competitor?
    │   └── What would have changed their mind?
    │
    └── Lost to Competitor
        ├── What was the deciding factor?
        ├── Where did we fall short?
        └── What could we have done differently?

The Battlecard Structure

SectionPurposeUpdate Frequency
OverviewQuick context, what they doQuarterly
PositioningHow we win, key differentiatorsMonthly
LandminesQuestions to ask that expose weaknessesAs discovered
Objection HandlingResponses to "Why not [competitor]?"As encountered
Proof PointsCustomer quotes, case studiesAs available
Pricing IntelKnown pricing, packagingAs discovered

Competitive Response Spectrum

SituationResponseExample
They launch feature you haveEmphasize experience, depth"We've had this for 2 years, here's what we've learned"
They launch feature you don'tRoadmap or reframe"We're focused on X because customers told us Y matters more"
They cut priceHold on value"You get what you pay for — here's the TCO comparison"
They spread FUDCorrect with facts"That's not accurate — here's the truth with proof"
They announce fundingIgnore or pivot to stability"We've been profitable since 2019"

Intelligence Sources (Ranked by Value)

  1. Win/loss interviews — First-party, high signal
  2. Sales call recordings — Real objections, real context
  3. Customer feedback — Why they chose you (and considered others)
  4. G2/Capterra reviews — Volume of sentiment data
  5. LinkedIn activity — Hiring, messaging, customer posts
  6. Job postings — Strategic direction signals
  7. Press/funding news — Major moves, positioning shifts
  8. Product trials — Hands-on intel (respect ToS)

Anti-Patterns

  • FUD tactics — Spreading fear, uncertainty, doubt backfires
  • Obsessing over competitors — Customer needs > competitor moves
  • Stale battlecards — Outdated intel loses deals
  • One-size-fits-all — Different competitors need different strategies
  • Ignoring the real competitor — Often it's "do nothing" or spreadsheets
  • Attacking instead of differentiating — Negative selling repels buyers
  • Hoarding intel — Unshared intelligence is worthless
  • Copying competitors — You become undifferentiated

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.54%
按下载量换算189

Claude

32.51%
按下载量换算189

Cursor

19.7%
按下载量换算115

Gemini CLI

8.84%
按下载量换算51

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills