Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

competitive-analysis-templates竞争分析模板

Agent Skill

competitive-analysis-templates 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

194

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

80

下载量

63
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-analysis-templates(竞争分析模板)
来源仓库:https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents
仓库路径:skills/competitive-analysis-templates
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents --skill competitive-analysis-templates
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents --skill competitive-analysis-templates

简介

提供结构化模板用于竞争策略与销售战卡制作。

  • 适合生成特征对比矩阵与市场定位地图。
  • 自动加载于 market-analyst 场景,支持 win/loss 分析与威胁监控。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发外部数据引用。
  • competitive-analysis-templates 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Competitive Analysis Templates

Templates for analyzing competitors, enabling sales teams, and defining strategic market positioning.

When to Use This Skill

Auto-loaded by agents:

  • market-analyst - For competitor deep-dives, battle cards, and positioning maps

Use when you need:

  • Analyzing competitor strategies and offerings
  • Creating sales battle cards
  • Building feature comparison matrices
  • Tracking competitive intelligence
  • Conducting win/loss analysis
  • Defining differentiation strategy
  • Monitoring competitive threats
  • Positioning against alternatives

What is Competitive Analysis?

Competitive analysis helps you:

  • Understand your market position and competitive landscape
  • Identify differentiation opportunities and white space
  • Enable sales teams to win competitive deals
  • Inform product roadmap and strategic decisions
  • Monitor competitive threats and market shifts

NOT: Copying competitors or building feature parity BUT: Finding defensible differentiation and strategic positioning

Good competitive analysis: Actionable, evidence-based, honest about trade-offs, regularly updated

Bad competitive analysis: Feature lists without context, outdated, biased, not used by teams


Evidence Standards

Core principle: All competitive intelligence must be based on verifiable public sources. Strategic analysis and recommendations are core value, but factual claims require source attribution.

Research requirements:

  1. Use verifiable public sources

- Competitor websites, product pages, and documentation - Pricing pages (with URLs and date accessed) - Review sites (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius) with specific review citations - News articles, press releases, and public announcements - Product demos, trials, and publicly available materials

  1. Source attribution

- Every claim about competitor features, pricing, or strategy must cite source - Format: "[Feature/Claim] (Source: [URL], accessed [Date])" - Review quotes must cite specific review with link - When multiple sources confirm: cite 2-3 representative sources

  1. When data is unavailable

- Explicitly note: "[Pricing not publicly available]", "[Requires product trial]" - Never fabricate competitor information to complete analysis - Recommend steps to gather missing data (demo request, trial signup) - Note limitation in battle card or analysis

  1. What you CANNOT do

- Fabricate competitor features, pricing, or capabilities - Invent user testimonials or review quotes - Make up market share numbers or competitive statistics - Create fictional customer case studies

  1. What you SHOULD do (core value)

- Provide strategic analysis of competitive landscape - Identify differentiation opportunities based on research - Recommend positioning strategy against competitors - Guide battle card creation and sales enablement - Teach competitive intelligence methodologies - Help interpret competitive data for strategic decisions

When in doubt: If public information is unavailable, note the limitation explicitly rather than inventing data. Your strategic expertise in competitive analysis and positioning is your primary value.


Three Core Templates

1. Competitor Deep-Dive Analysis

Purpose: Comprehensive competitive intelligence for strategic decisions

Use when:

  • Quarterly competitive reviews
  • Market entry planning
  • Product roadmap planning
  • Understanding new competitive threat
  • Executive briefings

Key sections:

  • Company overview (size, funding, strategy)
  • Product analysis (features, UX, pricing)
  • Go-to-market strategy (sales, marketing)
  • SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats)
  • Customer intelligence (reviews, win/loss)
  • Competitive response strategy

Template: assets/competitor-deep-dive-template.md

Complete template with all sections, example content, intelligence sources

Time investment: 8-12 hours initial, 2-3 hours quarterly updates

Comprehensive guide: references/competitive-intel-guide.md

Intelligence gathering, research techniques, analysis frameworks, organizing intelligence


2. Battle Card (Sales Enablement)

Purpose: Quick-reference competitive enablement for sales teams

Use when:

  • Sales team faces competitor regularly
  • New competitive threat emerges
  • Need to improve win rates vs. specific competitor
  • Onboarding new sales reps

Key sections:

  • Quick stats (foundational context)
  • When you'll face them (common scenarios)
  • Where we win (strengths with proof)
  • Where they win (their strengths + how to counter)
  • Common objections & responses
  • Discovery questions (uncover our advantages)
  • Proof points (customer stories, data)

Quick skeleton:

# [Competitor] Battle Card

## Quick Stats
- Founded: / HQ: / Funding: / Employees:

## Where We Win
- [Advantage 1]: [proof point]

## Where They Win
- [Their strength]: [our counter]

## Top Objections
- "[Objection]" → [Response with proof]

Full template: assets/battle-card-template.md

Sales-ready format, specific talk tracks, objection handling, proof points

Format: 1-2 pages maximum (quick reference for calls)

Update frequency: Immediately on competitor changes, monthly review

Comprehensive guide: references/battle-card-guide.md

Creating effective battle cards, sales enablement, training, maintenance, metrics


3. Positioning & Perceptual Mapping

Purpose: Strategic market positioning and visual competitive landscape

Use when:

  • Strategic planning (annual/quarterly)
  • Defining product strategy
  • Finding market white space
  • Developing messaging
  • Repositioning product

Key sections:

  • Perceptual maps (visual market positioning)
  • Positioning statement (April Dunford framework)
  • Differentiation matrix
  • Value proposition map (jobs, pains, gains)
  • Strategic positioning grid
  • Brand positioning
  • Messaging framework

Template: assets/positioning-map-template.md

Perceptual mapping formats, positioning frameworks, differentiation analysis

Use cases: Strategic planning, market entry, messaging development

Comprehensive guide: references/positioning-guide.md

Positioning frameworks, differentiation strategies, perceptual mapping, repositioning


Choosing the Right Template

For strategic planning → Use all three:

  1. Deep-dive analysis (understand landscape)
  2. Positioning map (define your position)
  3. Battle cards (enable execution)

For sales enablement → Battle cards:

  • Quick reference during calls
  • Specific talk tracks and counters
  • Updated frequently

For product strategy → Deep-dive + Positioning:

  • Feature gap analysis
  • Market white space
  • Differentiation strategy

For one competitor → Start with deep-dive, then battle card

For market overview → Positioning map first (landscape), then selective deep-dives


Competitive Intelligence Process

1. Gather Intelligence

Primary sources:

  • Competitor website, demos, trials
  • Customer reviews (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius)
  • Win/loss interviews
  • Customer feedback

Secondary sources:

  • Press releases, news
  • Job postings (strategic direction)
  • Social media, podcasts
  • Analyst reports

Source citation requirements:

  • Document URL and access date for every source
  • Cite specific G2/Capterra reviews with links for user quotes
  • Note when information is unavailable: "[Pricing not public]"
  • Never fabricate data to fill intelligence gaps
  • Recommend additional research steps for missing data

Detailed guide: references/competitive-intel-guide.md

Research techniques, intelligence sources, ethical guidelines, source citation best practices


2. Analyze Patterns

Look for:

  • Feature launch velocity (product strategy)
  • Market expansion signals
  • Pricing changes
  • Partnership announcements
  • Messaging shifts

Framework: Use SWOT analysis

  • Strengths: What they do well (facts, evidence)
  • Weaknesses: Exploitable gaps (customer complaints, missing features)
  • Opportunities (for them): Anticipate their moves
  • Threats (to us): How they could hurt us

3. Act on Insights

Product decisions:

  • Close critical gaps (table stakes)
  • Exploit weaknesses (differentiation)
  • Defend strengths (maintain advantage)

Positioning:

  • Find defensible differentiation
  • Avoid head-to-head on their strengths
  • Position in category where you win

Sales enablement:

  • Create battle cards (competitive situations)
  • Train on objection handling
  • Share win stories

Positioning Frameworks

April Dunford's 5 Components

Work through in this order:

1. Competitive Alternatives: What would customers use if you didn't exist?

2. Unique Attributes: What can you do that alternatives can't?

3. Value (Benefits): What do those unique attributes enable?

4. Target Customer: Who cares most about that value?

5. Market Category: What context makes your value obvious?

Example:

For [target customer] who need to [job to be done],
[Product] is a [market category] that [key value proposition].
Unlike [competitive alternative] which [competitor limitation],
we [unique differentiation].
For Series A B2B SaaS companies who need to scale pipeline without growing SDR headcount, [Product] is an AI-powered sales development platform that books 10x more qualified meetings. Unlike Salesforce which requires large SDR teams, we use AI to automate the entire top-of-funnel.

Complete framework: references/positioning-guide.md

Positioning strategies, differentiation, perceptual mapping, validation


Perceptual Mapping

Purpose: Visualize competitive landscape, find white space

Common axes:

  • Price vs. Capabilities
  • Ease of Use vs. Power
  • Horizontal vs. Vertical
  • Self-serve vs. Enterprise

Strategic insights:

  • White space (underserved segments)
  • Crowded areas (avoid competing)
  • Movement over time (strategic direction)

Template: assets/positioning-map-template.md

Multiple perceptual map formats, strategic analysis


Battle Card Best Practices

Format:

  • 1-2 pages maximum (quick reference)
  • Bullets, not paragraphs
  • Specific talk tracks (exact words)
  • Print-friendly

Content:

  • Be honest about weaknesses (builds credibility)
  • Use customer language (outcomes, not features)
  • Include proof points (quotes, data, case studies)
  • Provide discovery questions (uncover advantages)

Maintenance:

  • Update immediately on competitor changes
  • Monthly review, quarterly refresh
  • Sales feedback loop
  • Track win rates

Detailed guide: references/battle-card-guide.md

Creating, training, maintenance, metrics


Organizing Competitive Intelligence

Repository Structure

/Competitive Intelligence
  /Competitor A
    - Deep-dive analysis.md
    - Battle card.md
    - Product screenshots/
    - Reviews analysis.md
  /Competitor B
    [Same structure]
  /Market Maps
    - Positioning map.md
    - Feature comparison.xlsx
  /Win-Loss Analysis
    - Quarterly summaries

Update Cadence

Continuous: Monitor for major changes (Google Alerts, RSS)

Monthly:

  • Scan competitor websites, blogs, changelogs
  • Read recent reviews
  • Update battle cards if needed

Quarterly:

  • Deep-dive analysis refresh
  • Win/loss review
  • Positioning assessment
  • Sales team competitive briefing

Detailed guide: references/competitive-intel-guide.md

Monitoring strategies, intelligence distribution


Troubleshooting

Feature parity obsession:

  • Problem: Building everything competitors have
  • Fix: Focus on defensible differentiation

Outdated intelligence:

  • Problem: Stale battle cards, wrong pricing
  • Fix: Regular update cadence, monitoring systems

Too comprehensive:

  • Problem: 50-page analysis nobody reads
  • Fix: Right level of detail for audience (battle card vs. deep-dive)

Ignoring weaknesses:

  • Problem: Only highlighting strengths
  • Fix: Honest assessment of trade-offs

Not using the intelligence:

  • Problem: Analysis sits in drive, not actioned
  • Fix: Clear distribution, sales training, product impact

For Solo Operators / Small Teams

Simplified approach:

Focus: 2-3 most important competitors only

Monthly routine (2-3 hours):

  • Check competitor websites for changes
  • Read 5-10 recent G2 reviews
  • Scan their blog/changelog
  • Update battle card if needed

Quarterly deep-dive (half day):

  • Full product trial
  • Read 20-30 reviews
  • Update positioning map
  • Refresh analysis doc

Templates to use:

  • Battle card (1 page version)
  • Simplified positioning map
  • Lightweight deep-dive (key sections only)

Templates and References

Assets (Ready-to-Use Templates)

Copy-paste these for immediate use:

  • assets/competitor-deep-dive-template.md - Comprehensive competitive analysis
  • assets/battle-card-template.md - Sales enablement quick reference
  • assets/positioning-map-template.md - Strategic positioning & perceptual maps

References (Deep Dives)

When you need comprehensive guidance:

  • references/competitive-intel-guide.md - Intelligence gathering, research, analysis
  • references/battle-card-guide.md - Creating effective battle cards, sales enablement
  • references/positioning-guide.md - Positioning frameworks, differentiation strategies

Related Skills

  • product-positioning - Product positioning frameworks
  • go-to-market-playbooks - GTM and launch strategy
  • roadmap-frameworks - Product roadmaps
  • market-sizing-frameworks - Market opportunity assessment

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.17%
按下载量换算22

Claude

29.04%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

17.99%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

9.49%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills