Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

closed-loop-design闭环设计

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

259

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

61

下载量

91
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:closed-loop-design(闭环设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/closed-loop-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill closed-loop-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill closed-loop-design

简介

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化,适合生成 UI 方案或改进组件层级。

  • 适用于整理页面结构、检查视觉一致性,需结合品牌和设计系统使用。
  • 通过 Request-Validate-Resolve 模式确保设计闭环,避免堆砌装饰元素。
  • 涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出和响应式表现。
  • 安装前建议确认宿主环境兼容性,注意权限范围和文件操作影响。

SKILL.md

Closed Loop Design Skill

Guide for designing closed-loop prompts that ensure agent reliability through feedback loops.

When to Use

  • Designing new agentic workflows
  • Adding validation to existing processes
  • Creating self-correcting agent pipelines
  • Building automated test-fix cycles

Core Concept

Every agentic operation should follow the Request-Validate-Resolve pattern:

REQUEST → VALIDATE → RESOLVE
    ↑                    ↓
    └────────────────────┘

Design Workflow

Step 1: Identify the Operation

What task needs to be validated?

  • Code changes (feature, bug fix, refactor)
  • File operations (create, modify, delete)
  • External interactions (API calls, database queries)
  • Build/deploy operations

Step 2: Define Validation Mechanism

How do we know if it succeeded?

Operation TypeValidation Mechanism
Code changesRun tests, type check, lint
File operationsVerify file exists, check content
API interactionsCheck response status, validate data
Build operationsBuild succeeds, no errors

Step 3: Design the Resolve Path

What happens on failure?

  1. Analyze: Parse error output to understand failure
  2. Fix: Make minimal, targeted corrections
  3. Re-validate: Run validation again
  4. Limit retries: Set maximum attempts (typically 3-5)

Step 4: Create the Prompt Structure

Template:

## Closed Loop: [Operation Name]

### Request
[Clear task description with success criteria]

### Validate
- Command: `[validation command]`
- Success: [what success looks like]
- Failure: [what failure looks like]

### Resolve (if validation fails)
1. Analyze the failure output
2. Identify root cause
3. Apply minimal fix
4. Return to Validate step
5. Maximum 3 retry attempts

Example: Test-Fix Loop

## Closed Loop: Implement Feature

### Request
Implement the user login feature according to spec.

### Validate
- Command: `pytest tests/test_auth.py -v`
- Success: All tests pass (exit code 0)
- Failure: One or more tests fail

### Resolve
1. Read failing test output
2. Identify which test failed and why
3. Fix the implementation (not the test)
4. Re-run pytest
5. Maximum 3 retry attempts

Common Closed Loop Patterns

Code Quality Loop

REQUEST: Write/modify code
VALIDATE: Lint + Type check + Tests
RESOLVE: Fix errors iteratively

Build Verification Loop

REQUEST: Make changes
VALIDATE: Full build succeeds
RESOLVE: Fix build errors

E2E Validation Loop

REQUEST: Implement user flow
VALIDATE: E2E test passes
RESOLVE: Fix failing steps

Best Practices

  1. Start with tests: If tests do not exist, consider adding them first
  2. Fast validation first: Run quick checks before slow ones
  3. Structured output: Use JSON for machine-parseable results
  4. Clear failure messages: Include context for resolution
  5. Bounded retries: Prevent infinite loops

Memory References

  • @closed-loop-anatomy.md - Full pattern documentation
  • @test-leverage-point.md - Why tests are ideal validators
  • @validation-commands.md - Validation command patterns

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release

Last Updated

Date: 2025-12-26 Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Antigravity

28.52%
按下载量换算26

trae

23.91%
按下载量换算22

windsurf

17.98%
按下载量换算16

Claude Code

11.11%
按下载量换算10

Codex

7.04%
按下载量换算6

Gemini CLI

3.3%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills