cli-forge-plan（CLI forge 计划）

cli-forge Plan

Use this stage to translate the approved design contract into a detailed, actionable CLI contract that Scaffold, Extend, and Validate will consume as their authoritative reference.

Purpose

Define the detailed CLI contract: every command, every flag, every output format, every behavioral rule. This stage answers the question "How does the CLI work?" while the Design stage upstream answered "What is this skill?"

The cli-plan.yml produced by this stage is the single source of truth that Scaffold uses for template expansion, Extend uses for capability pre-checks, and Validate uses as the compliance baseline.

Canonical References

• ./instructions/plan-cli.md
• ./instructions/daemon-app-server.md
• ./planning-brief.md
• ./contracts/cli-plan.yml.tpl
• ./contracts/design-contract.yml.tpl

Entry Gate

Required Inputs

• Approved design-contract.yml from the Design stage
• User requirements for CLI behavior (commands, flags, formats)
• Capability scope decisions (stream, repl, and daemon: in-scope or out-of-scope)

Workflow

1. Load the approved design-contract.yml from .cli-forge/.
2. Read ./planning-brief.md to load the shared constraints.
3. Follow the detailed steps in ./instructions/plan-cli.md.
4. Define the command tree:

- Primary CLI entrypoint - Subcommands (if any) - The help subcommand (always present) - The daemon subcommand group when daemon capability is in scope - Every command path must be classified as either a runnable leaf command or a non-leaf container for child subcommands, never both

1. For each command, lock:

- Required flags with types, defaults, and descriptions - Optional flags with types, defaults, and descriptions - Supported output formats - Error format (always structured_stderr)

1. Lock the invocation hierarchy:

- Shipped: <skill-name>... - Dev: cargo run --... - Release binary: ./target/release/<skill-name>...

1. Lock the help behavior as four explicit scenarios:

- Leaf default: missing required leaf input stays a structured failure, not auto-help - Non-leaf default: top-level and non-leaf command paths auto-render human-readable help - Flag-driven: --help on any command path renders human-readable help - Structured: help subcommand with --format - Human-readable help must be man-like, with NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION, OPTIONS, FORMATS, EXAMPLES, and EXIT CODES in that order

1. Lock capability scope — for each of stream, repl, and daemon, explicitly state in_scope or out_of_scope.
2. If daemon is in scope, lock the daemon app-server contract:

- App-server mode - Single-instance default - Lifecycle commands: run, start, stop, restart, status - Client routing flags and daemonizable commands - Local IPC default, optional TCP, and auth expectations

1. Lock runtime directory and Active Context behavior.
2. Generate .cli-forge/cli-plan.yml using the format defined in ./contracts/cli-plan.yml.tpl.
3. Present the CLI plan to the user for approval. Call the runtime's dialog-based chooser (e.g., AskUserQuestion) with the options approve and continue, request changes, or stop for now when it is available. If no dialog-based chooser is available, use a numbered text menu with the same three options and add Other: <custom response> as the fallback escape hatch. Accept exact replies 1, 2, or 3, or Other:.... If a numeric reply includes additional text, ask for clarification before proceeding. Do not require the user to type the full option label.

Outputs

• .cli-forge/cli-plan.yml — approved detailed CLI contract

Exit Gate

Guardrails

• CRITICAL DIRECTIVE TO THE ASSISTANT: You MUST STOP execution and ask for the user's explicit approval after generating cli-plan.yml. Do NOT proceed to the Scaffold stage autonomously. Call the runtime's dialog-based chooser (e.g., AskUserQuestion) for approval when it is available, or use the standardized numbered text fallback with 1. approve and continue, 2. request changes, 3. stop for now, and Other: <custom response>. Never require the user to type the literal word approved.
• Do not change the skill's purpose or positioning here. That work was done in the Design stage and is locked in design-contract.yml.
• Do not begin implementing code. This stage produces a plan document, not source files.
• Every decision in cli-plan.yml must be traceable to the planning brief constraints.
• Do not define a hybrid command path that is both a runnable leaf and a parent for subcommands. Every command path must be exactly one of those shapes.
• If stream, repl, or daemon is out of scope, say so explicitly. Do not leave the optional feature set undefined.
• The daemon app-server design is documented in ./instructions/daemon-app-server.md and is the planning source of truth for daemon behavior. If scaffold, extend, or validate have not adopted that contract yet, call the mismatch out explicitly instead of claiming end-to-end implementation parity.
• When the Extend stage later adds a feature, it must update cli-plan.yml to reflect the new capability. Plan is the living contract.

Next Step

Continue with ../cli-forge-scaffold/SKILL.md to create the project from the approved plan.