Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

clear-writing字迹清晰

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

38,164

周安装

1,529

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

12,354
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clear-writing(字迹清晰)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wpank/clear-writing
安装命令:
openclaw skills install clear-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install clear-writing

简介

为人类编写清晰、简洁的散文 — 文档、自述文件、API 文档、提交消息、错误消息、UI 文本、报告和解释。将 Strunk 的清晰散文规则与技术文档模式、结构模板和审查清单相结合。

SKILL.md

name
clear-writing
model
standard
version
1.0.0
description
>
tags
[writing, documentation, style, technical-writing, prose]

Clear Writing

Write with clarity and force. This skill covers what to do (Strunk's rules), how to structure technical documentation (Divio patterns, templates), and what not to do (AI anti-patterns, doc anti-patterns).

When to Use

Use this skill whenever you write prose for humans:

  • Documentation, README files, technical explanations
  • API documentation, endpoint references, integration guides
  • Tutorials, how-to guides, architecture docs
  • Commit messages, pull request descriptions
  • Error messages, UI copy, help text, comments
  • Reports, summaries, or any explanation
  • Editing existing prose to improve clarity

If you're writing sentences for a human to read, use this skill.

Limited Context Strategy

When context is tight:

  1. Write your draft using judgment
  2. Dispatch a subagent with your draft and the relevant reference file
  3. Have the subagent copyedit and return the revision

Loading a single reference (~1,000–4,500 tokens) instead of the full skill saves significant context.

Elements of Style

William Strunk Jr.'s *The Elements of Style* (1918) teaches you to write clearly and cut ruthlessly.

Rules

Elementary Rules of Usage (Grammar/Punctuation):

  1. Form possessive singular by adding 's
  2. Use comma after each term in series except last
  3. Enclose parenthetic expressions between commas
  4. Comma before conjunction introducing co-ordinate clause
  5. Don't join independent clauses by comma
  6. Don't break sentences in two
  7. Participial phrase at beginning refers to grammatical subject

Elementary Principles of Composition:

  1. One paragraph per topic
  2. Begin paragraph with topic sentence
  3. Use active voice
  4. Put statements in positive form
  5. Use definite, specific, concrete language
  6. Omit needless words
  7. Avoid succession of loose sentences
  8. Express co-ordinate ideas in similar form
  9. Keep related words together
  10. Keep to one tense in summaries
  11. Place emphatic words at end of sentence

Reference Files

For complete explanations with examples:

SectionFile~Tokens
Grammar, punctuation, comma rulesreferences/elements-of-style/02-elementary-rules-of-usage.md2,500
Paragraph structure, active voice, concisionreferences/elements-of-style/03-elementary-principles-of-composition.md4,500
Headings, quotations, formattingreferences/elements-of-style/04-a-few-matters-of-form.md1,000
Word choice, common errorsreferences/elements-of-style/05-words-and-expressions-commonly-misused.md4,000

Most tasks need only 03-elementary-principles-of-composition.md — it covers active voice, positive form, concrete language, and omitting needless words.

AI Writing Patterns to Avoid

LLMs regress to statistical means, producing generic, puffy prose. Avoid:

  • Puffery: pivotal, crucial, vital, testament, enduring legacy
  • Empty "-ing" phrases: ensuring reliability, showcasing features, highlighting capabilities
  • Promotional adjectives: groundbreaking, seamless, robust, cutting-edge
  • Overused AI vocabulary: delve, leverage, multifaceted, foster, realm, tapestry
  • Formatting overuse: excessive bullets, emoji decorations, bold on every other word

Be specific, not grandiose. Say what it actually does.

For comprehensive research on why these patterns occur, see references/signs-of-ai-writing.md. Wikipedia editors developed this guide to detect AI-generated submissions — their patterns are well-documented and field-tested.

Document Types (Divio Framework)

TypePurposeStructure
READMEFirst impression, project overviewTitle, description, quick start, install, usage
TutorialLearning-oriented, guided experienceNumbered steps with expected outcomes
How-to GuideTask-oriented, solve a specific problemProblem statement → steps → result
ReferenceInformation-oriented, complete and accurateAlphabetical or grouped, consistent format
ExplanationUnderstanding-oriented, context and rationaleNarrative prose, diagrams, history
Architecture DocSystem design, component relationshipsContext → components → data flow → decisions
API DocumentationEndpoint contracts, integration guideEndpoint → params → request → response → errors

Structure Patterns

Inverted Pyramid

Lead with the most important information. Each subsequent section adds detail.

1. What it does (one sentence)
2. How to use it (quick start)
3. Configuration options
4. Advanced usage
5. Internals / implementation details

Problem-Solution

1. Problem — what goes wrong, symptoms, error messages
2. Cause — why it happens (brief)
3. Solution — step-by-step fix
4. Prevention — how to avoid it in the future

Sequential Steps

Every step is a single action with a verifiable outcome.

1. Step — one action, one verb
   Expected result: what the reader should see
2. Step — next action
   Expected result: confirmation of success

Writing Rules

RuleGuidelineExample
Short sentencesKeep under 25 words"The server restarts automatically after config changes."
Active voiceSubject does the action"The function returns a promise" not "A promise is returned"
Present tenseDescribe current behavior"This endpoint accepts JSON" not "will accept JSON"
One idea per paragraphEach paragraph has one pointSplit compound paragraphs at the topic shift
Define jargon on first useNever assume vocabulary"The ORM (Object-Relational Mapper) translates..."
Second personAddress the reader directly"You can configure..." not "One can configure..."
Consistent terminologyPick one term and stick with itDon't alternate between "repo" and "repository"
Concrete over abstractSpecifics beat generalities"Returns a 404 status code" not "Returns an error"

Code Examples in Documentation

Every code example must follow these rules:

  1. Complete and runnable — copy-paste and execute without modification
  2. Annotated — comments on the non-obvious parts, not the obvious ones
  3. Progressive complexity — simplest case first, then advanced usage
  4. Language-tagged — always specify the language in fenced code blocks
  5. Current — examples must work with the documented version
  6. Minimal — show only what is relevant; strip unrelated boilerplate
# Good: complete, annotated, minimal
import httpx

# Create a client with a base URL to avoid repeating it
client = httpx.Client(base_url="https://api.example.com")

# Fetch a user by ID — returns a User dict or raises for 4xx/5xx
response = client.get("/users/42")
response.raise_for_status()
user = response.json()
print(user["name"])  # "Ada Lovelace"

README Template

# Project Name

One-line description of what this project does and who it is for.

## Quick Start

The fastest path from zero to working. Three commands or fewer.

## Installation

Prerequisites, system requirements, and step-by-step install.

## Usage

Common use cases with code examples. Cover the 80% case.

## API

Public API surface — functions, classes, CLI flags, endpoints.

## Configuration

Environment variables, config files, and their defaults.

## Contributing

How to set up the dev environment, run tests, and submit changes.

## License

License name and link to the full LICENSE file.

README rules:

  • Keep the quick start under 60 seconds of reader time
  • Include a badge row only if badges are kept current
  • Link to deeper docs rather than bloating the README
  • Update the README whenever the public interface changes

API Documentation Pattern

Document every endpoint with this structure:

### GET /users/:id

Retrieve a single user by their unique identifier.

**Authentication:** Bearer token required

**Path Parameters:**

| Parameter | Type   | Required | Description          |
|-----------|--------|----------|----------------------|
| id        | string | Yes      | The user's unique ID |

**Response: 200 OK**

{json response example}

**Error Responses:**

| Status | Code         | Description              |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------|
| 401    | UNAUTHORIZED | Missing or invalid token |
| 404    | NOT_FOUND    | User does not exist      |

Always document errors with: HTTP status, machine-readable error code, human-readable message, and resolution steps.

Audience Adaptation

AudienceContext LevelFocusTone
BeginnerHigh — define terms, explain prerequisitesWhat and how, step by stepEncouraging, patient
IntermediateMedium — assume basic knowledgeHow and best practicesDirect, practical
ExpertLow — skip fundamentalsWhy, edge cases, tradeoffsConcise, precise

Rules:

  • State the assumed audience at the top of the document
  • Link to prerequisite knowledge rather than re-explaining it
  • Use expandable sections (<details>) for beginner context in expert docs
  • Never mix audience levels in the same section

Review Checklist

Before publishing any documentation:

  • [ ] Accurate — all code examples run, all commands work, all links resolve
  • [ ] Complete — covers setup, happy path, error cases, and cleanup
  • [ ] Consistent — terminology, formatting, and voice match the rest of the docs
  • [ ] Readable — passes a cold read by someone unfamiliar with the project
  • [ ] Scannable — headings, tables, and lists allow skimming for answers
  • [ ] Examples work — every code block tested against the current version
  • [ ] Links valid — no broken internal or external links
  • [ ] Audience-appropriate — context level matches the stated audience
  • [ ] Up to date — no references to deprecated features or old versions
  • [ ] Spellchecked — no typos, no inconsistent capitalization

Documentation Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternProblemFix
Wall of textReaders bounceBreak into sections with headings and lists
Outdated docsErodes trustTie doc updates to PR checklists; date-stamp pages
No examplesReaders can't apply abstract descriptionsAdd code examples for every public function
Assumed knowledgeExcludes beginnersDefine terms on first use, link to prerequisites
Copy-paste unfriendlyCode with $ prompts or line numbers breaks when pastedProvide clean, runnable code blocks
Screenshot-only instructionsCan't be searched, go stale, inaccessiblePair screenshots with text and commands

NEVER Do

  1. NEVER publish docs without testing every code example — broken examples destroy credibility faster than anything else
  2. NEVER write docs after the fact as an afterthought — write docs alongside the code; if you cannot explain it, the design needs work
  3. NEVER use "simply", "just", or "obviously" — these words shame readers who are struggling and add no information
  4. NEVER mix multiple audiences in one document — write separate beginner and advanced guides, or use clear section boundaries
  5. NEVER leave placeholder text in published docs — "TODO", "TBD", and "lorem ipsum" signal abandonment
  6. NEVER duplicate content across documents — link to a single source of truth; duplicates inevitably drift apart
  7. NEVER omit the date or version — readers must know if they are looking at current information
  8. NEVER use AI puffery words — pivotal, crucial, seamless, robust, groundbreaking, tapestry, and their ilk add nothing and signal lazy writing

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

72.83%
按下载量换算8,997

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills