Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计未展示

web-perf网络性能

Agent Skill

web-perf 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

15,519

周安装

498

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,532
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:web-perf(网络性能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/clawdbot/skills
仓库路径:skills/web-perf
安装命令:
npx skills add clawdbot/skills --skill "web-perf"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add clawdbot/skills --skill "web-perf"

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。web-perf 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

  • 适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。
  • 可在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中调用。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 注意是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

SKILL.md

name
web-perf
description
Analyzes web performance using Chrome DevTools MCP. Measures Core Web Vitals (FCP, LCP, TBT, CLS, Speed Index), identifies render-blocking resources, network dependency chains, layout shifts, caching issues, and accessibility gaps. Use when asked to audit, profile, debug, or optimize page load performance, Lighthouse scores, or site speed.

Web Performance Audit

Audit web page performance using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. This skill focuses on Core Web Vitals, network optimization, and high-level accessibility gaps.

FIRST: Verify MCP Tools Available

Run this before starting. Try calling navigate_page or performance_start_trace. If unavailable, STOP—the chrome-devtools MCP server isn't configured.

Ask the user to add this to their MCP config:

"chrome-devtools": {
  "type": "local",
  "command": ["npx", "-y", "chrome-devtools-mcp@latest"]
}

Key Guidelines

  • Be assertive: Verify claims by checking network requests, DOM, or codebase—then state findings definitively.
  • Verify before recommending: Confirm something is unused before suggesting removal.
  • Quantify impact: Use estimated savings from insights. Don't prioritize changes with 0ms impact.
  • Skip non-issues: If render-blocking resources have 0ms estimated impact, note but don't recommend action.
  • Be specific: Say "compress hero.png (450KB) to WebP" not "optimize images".
  • Prioritize ruthlessly: A site with 200ms LCP and 0 CLS is already excellent—say so.

Quick Reference

TaskTool Call
Load pagenavigate_page(url: "...")
Start traceperformance_start_trace(autoStop: true, reload: true)
Analyze insightperformance_analyze_insight(insightSetId: "...", insightName: "...")
List requestslist_network_requests(resourceTypes: ["Script", "Stylesheet", ...])
Request detailsget_network_request(reqid: <id>)
A11y snapshottake_snapshot(verbose: true)

Workflow

Copy this checklist to track progress:

Audit Progress:
- [ ] Phase 1: Performance trace (navigate + record)
- [ ] Phase 2: Core Web Vitals analysis (includes CLS culprits)
- [ ] Phase 3: Network analysis
- [ ] Phase 4: Accessibility snapshot
- [ ] Phase 5: Codebase analysis (skip if third-party site)

Phase 1: Performance Trace

  1. Navigate to the target URL:
   navigate_page(url: "<target-url>")
  1. Start a performance trace with reload to capture cold-load metrics:
   performance_start_trace(autoStop: true, reload: true)
  1. Wait for trace completion, then retrieve results.

Troubleshooting:

  • If trace returns empty or fails, verify the page loaded correctly with navigate_page first
  • If insight names don't match, inspect the trace response to list available insights

Phase 2: Core Web Vitals Analysis

Use performance_analyze_insight to extract key metrics.

Note: Insight names may vary across Chrome DevTools versions. If an insight name doesn't work, check the insightSetId from the trace response to discover available insights.

Common insight names:

MetricInsight NameWhat to Look For
LCPLCPBreakdownTime to largest contentful paint; breakdown of TTFB, resource load, render delay
CLSCLSCulpritsElements causing layout shifts (images without dimensions, injected content, font swaps)
Render BlockingRenderBlockingCSS/JS blocking first paint
Document LatencyDocumentLatencyServer response time issues
Network DependenciesNetworkRequestsDepGraphRequest chains delaying critical resources

Example:

performance_analyze_insight(insightSetId: "<id-from-trace>", insightName: "LCPBreakdown")

Key thresholds (good/needs-improvement/poor):

  • TTFB: < 800ms / < 1.8s / > 1.8s
  • FCP: < 1.8s / < 3s / > 3s
  • LCP: < 2.5s / < 4s / > 4s
  • INP: < 200ms / < 500ms / > 500ms
  • TBT: < 200ms / < 600ms / > 600ms
  • CLS: < 0.1 / < 0.25 / > 0.25
  • Speed Index: < 3.4s / < 5.8s / > 5.8s

Phase 3: Network Analysis

List all network requests to identify optimization opportunities:

list_network_requests(resourceTypes: ["Script", "Stylesheet", "Document", "Font", "Image"])

Look for:

  1. Render-blocking resources: JS/CSS in <head> without async/defer/media attributes
  2. Network chains: Resources discovered late because they depend on other resources loading first (e.g., CSS imports, JS-loaded fonts)
  3. Missing preloads: Critical resources (fonts, hero images, key scripts) not preloaded
  4. Caching issues: Missing or weak Cache-Control, ETag, or Last-Modified headers
  5. Large payloads: Uncompressed or oversized JS/CSS bundles
  6. Unused preconnects: If flagged, verify by checking if ANY requests went to that origin. If zero requests, it's definitively unused—recommend removal. If requests exist but loaded late, the preconnect may still be valuable.

For detailed request info:

get_network_request(reqid: <id>)

Phase 4: Accessibility Snapshot

Take an accessibility tree snapshot:

take_snapshot(verbose: true)

Flag high-level gaps:

  • Missing or duplicate ARIA IDs
  • Elements with poor contrast ratios (check against WCAG AA: 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text)
  • Focus traps or missing focus indicators
  • Interactive elements without accessible names

Phase 5: Codebase Analysis

Skip if auditing a third-party site without codebase access.

Analyze the codebase to understand where improvements can be made.

Detect Framework & Bundler

Search for configuration files to identify the stack:

ToolConfig Files
Webpackwebpack.config.js, webpack.*.js
Vitevite.config.js, vite.config.ts
Rolluprollup.config.js, rollup.config.mjs
esbuildesbuild.config.js, build scripts with esbuild
Parcel.parcelrc, package.json (parcel field)
Next.jsnext.config.js, next.config.mjs
Nuxtnuxt.config.js, nuxt.config.ts
SvelteKitsvelte.config.js
Astroastro.config.mjs

Also check package.json for framework dependencies and build scripts.

Tree-Shaking & Dead Code

  • Webpack: Check for mode: 'production', sideEffects in package.json, usedExports optimization
  • Vite/Rollup: Tree-shaking enabled by default; check for treeshake options
  • Look for: Barrel files (index.js re-exports), large utility libraries imported wholesale (lodash, moment)

Unused JS/CSS

  • Check for CSS-in-JS vs. static CSS extraction
  • Look for PurgeCSS/UnCSS configuration (Tailwind's content config)
  • Identify dynamic imports vs. eager loading

Polyfills

  • Check for @babel/preset-env targets and useBuiltIns setting
  • Look for core-js imports (often oversized)
  • Check browserslist config for overly broad targeting

Compression & Minification

  • Check for terser, esbuild, or swc minification
  • Look for gzip/brotli compression in build output or server config
  • Check for source maps in production builds (should be external or disabled)

Output Format

Present findings as:

  1. Core Web Vitals Summary - Table with metric, value, and rating (good/needs-improvement/poor)
  2. Top Issues - Prioritized list of problems with estimated impact (high/medium/low)
  3. Recommendations - Specific, actionable fixes with code snippets or config changes
  4. Codebase Findings - Framework/bundler detected, optimization opportunities (omit if no codebase access)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

windsurf

31.16%
按下载量换算1,101

OpenCode

22.15%
按下载量换算782

Codex

19.98%
按下载量换算706

clawdbot

12.84%
按下载量换算454

trae

7.57%
按下载量换算267

Cursor

3.76%
按下载量换算133

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills