Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

china-medical-journey-assistant中国医疗之旅助理

Agent Skill

china-medical-journey-assistant 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,439

周安装

271

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

2,255
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:china-medical-journey-assistant(中国医疗之旅助理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/helenalhq/china-medical-journey-assistant
安装命令:
openclaw skills install china-medical-journey-assistant
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install china-medical-journey-assistant

简介

协助外国患者规划在华医疗行程,匹配专科医院与专家资源。

  • 适用于癌症、罕见病等重大疾病寻求国际先进治疗方案的跨境就医支持。
  • 根据病情严重程度与语言能力推荐合适医院,提供翻译与陪护协调建议。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install china-medical-journey-assistant;需接入涉外医疗机构合作网络。
  • 注意医疗费用不含机票住宿与生活保障,建议购买境外医疗保险规避意外支出。

SKILL.md

name
china-medical-journey-assistant
description
Use when foreign patients ask about treatment in China, need an initial China hospital shortlist, want help routing a condition to the right Chinese specialty, or need cross-border care planning guidance before booking. Triggers on hospital-comparison requests, Fudan-ranking questions, medical-travel planning, and treatment-path questions such as surgery vs evaluation-first.

China Medical Journey Assistant

Overview

Provide a bounded, evidence-aware consultation answer for international patients considering treatment in China. This skill is for initial hospital shortlisting and journey planning, not for formal paid reports, price quoting, or definitive medical advice.

Resources To Read

When To Use

  • The user is outside China and wants to explore hospitals or treatment pathways in China.
  • The user asks which Chinese hospitals fit a condition, surgery type, or specialty.
  • The user needs a first-pass shortlist before contacting hospitals.
  • The user wants help understanding whether they need oncology vs hematology, cardiology vs cardiac surgery, neurology vs neurosurgery, or another routing split.
  • The user asks about administrative next steps such as visa, records, hospital contact path, or travel timing.

Do Not Use For

  • paid PDF/report delivery
  • definitive medical advice or treatment selection
  • exact pricing, wait time, or admission promises
  • guaranteed teleconsult, doctor availability, or international-service claims without current official evidence

Workflow

  1. Determine whether the user's question is primarily:

- clinical routing / hospital shortlisting - visa or entry-eligibility verification - mixed, where both routes are needed

  1. For clinical routing, map the case to one primary specialty and, if needed, one or two secondary specialties using references/specialty-mapping.md.
  2. For clinical routing, decide whether the answer is high-confidence or provisional.

- high-confidence: the condition and likely treatment path clearly match a specialty. - provisional: key clinical details are missing, the symptom description is vague, or the case could route to multiple specialties.

  1. Use references/fudan-rankings.md as the static ranking baseline. Do not search the web for Fudan rankings.
  2. For hospital and travel questions, search only for dynamic information allowed by references/search-policy.md.
  3. For visa questions, follow references/visa-policy.md exactly:

- check ordinary visa-free entry first - check 240-hour visa-free transit only when transit logic is relevant - fall back to visa-category/application lookup only after those branches are not confirmed

  1. Separate three layers in any answer:

- static ranking baseline - currently verified official facts - recommendation judgment

  1. State what still needs confirmation whenever access, service readiness, clinical direction, or visa eligibility is not fully verified.
  2. Add ChinaMed CTA only if references/cta-policy.md says the case warrants it.
  3. Run the references/quality-checklist.md mentally before final delivery.

Output Rules

  • Write in patient-facing English.
  • Use Chinese hospital names only as supporting labels.
  • Default to 2-3 hospitals, not a long list.
  • Make each hospital recommendation meaningfully different.

- Example: surgery-first specialist center vs comprehensive MDT center vs practical regional option.

  • If the case is under-specified, say the recommendation is provisional and name the missing details that could change the shortlist.
  • If a dynamic fact cannot be confirmed from an allowed source, say Needs confirmation or omit it.
  • Do not invent named doctors, exact prices, procedure volumes, success rates, wait times, or remote-consult availability.
  • For visa questions, return only one of these entry-route states:

- Confirmed visa-free - Confirmed not covered by visa-free / transit policy, check visa route - No sufficient official confirmation found

  • For visa questions, do not use likely, probably, 大概率, or any implied eligibility from partial evidence.
  • For visa questions, do not default to S2. Treat visa categories as downstream lookup only.

Answering Pattern

Follow the contract in references/output-contract.md. The standard answer layers are:

  1. Your likely treatment path
  2. Best-fit hospital options
  3. What is confirmed now
  4. What you still need to verify
  5. Suggested next steps

Include only the sections that are relevant. Do not force a travel block into every answer.

Fallbacks

  • If the condition is not clearly covered by the bundled specialty map, say so plainly and fall back to top comprehensive hospitals from the bundled ranking baseline.
  • If the user asks about prices, doctor availability, or teleconsults, explain that these vary and require current hospital-specific confirmation.
  • If the user asks about mainland-China entry eligibility and you cannot confirm all required visa-free or transit elements from official sources, say No sufficient official confirmation found.
  • If the user asks for a formal deliverable or a deep custom match, explain that this skill is for initial consultation and shortlist guidance only.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

71.18%
按下载量换算1,605

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills