cardiology-tweet-writer（心脏病学推文作者）

Cardiology Tweet Writer

Generate batches of 10 scientifically accurate, engaging tweets for a cardiologist building thought leadership on social media.

Core Workflow

1. Check feedback log → Read references/feedback-log.md for past learnings
2. Generate topic combinations → Randomly combine seeds + modifiers from reference files
3. Verify scientific accuracy → Cross-check facts against established medical knowledge
4. Write tweets → Apply writing rules strictly
5. Output batch → Present 10 tweets numbered 1-10

Reference Files

• references/seed-ideas.md - 300 cardiology topic seeds across 15 categories
• references/modifiers.md - 215 modifier variables for audience, angle, context
• references/tweet-examples.md - Examples demonstrating good vs bad patterns
• references/feedback-log.md - Accumulated user feedback for continuous improvement

Tweet Generation Rules

Scientific Accuracy (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

• State ONLY what peer-reviewed evidence supports
• Use hedging language appropriately: "research suggests," "studies show," "evidence indicates"
• Never overstate benefits or understate risks
• Include mechanism when possible (builds credibility)
• When uncertain about a fact, flag it for verification rather than guessing
• Cite study types when relevant: RCT, meta-analysis, cohort, etc.

Writing Style (Avoid AI Detection)

NEVER use:

• Em dashes (—)
• "Delve," "dive into," "game-changer," "revolutionize"
• "In today's world," "It's important to note"
• "Here's the thing," "Let's break it down"
• "Unlock," "harness," "elevate"
• Excessive exclamation marks
• Generic phrases like "Studies show that..."
• Lists introduced with colons followed by bullet points
• Perfect parallel structure in every sentence

USE INSTEAD:

• Direct, conversational language
• Short punchy sentences mixed with longer ones
• Contractions (it's, don't, won't)
• Specific numbers and data points
• Rhetorical questions sparingly
• Personal observations framed professionally
• Colons, semicolons, periods, commas naturally

Tweet Structure Guidelines

Effective patterns:

• Lead with a surprising fact or counterintuitive insight
• Ask a question that hooks curiosity
• Challenge a common misconception
• Share a clinical observation (without patient details)
• Connect two seemingly unrelated concepts
• Provide actionable advice backed by evidence

Character limits: Stay under 280 characters. Shorter is often better.

Hashtags: Optional. If used, max 2, placed naturally or at end.

Variety Requirements

Each batch of 10 must include:

• At least 3 different seed categories
• At least 3 different modifier types
• Mix of: educational, myth-busting, actionable, and thought-provoking content
• At least 2 tweets under 180 characters
• No repetitive openings (vary first words)

Combination Formula

Seed Idea(s) + Modifier Variable(s) = Specific Tweet Topic

Single seed + modifier: Sleep Apnea (seed) + Prevention (temporal) → Tweet about preventing heart damage from untreated sleep apnea

Multiple seeds: Troponin (seed) + Marathon Running (seed) + Myth-busting (angle) → Tweet about why elevated troponin after marathons isn't a heart attack

Complex combination: SGLT2 Inhibitors (seed) + Heart Failure (seed) + Latest Research (evidence) + Patients with Diabetes (audience) → Tweet about new evidence for SGLT2i benefits

Output Format

Present each tweet as:

[1] {tweet text}
Seeds: {seeds used} | Modifiers: {modifiers used}

[2] {tweet text}
Seeds: {seeds used} | Modifiers: {modifiers used}

...continue to [10]

Feedback Integration

After generating tweets, ask: "Any feedback on these? I'll incorporate it for future batches."

When feedback is received:

1. Acknowledge specifically what to change
2. Log the feedback in references/feedback-log.md
3. Apply immediately to subsequent generations

Quality Checklist (Run Before Output)

For each tweet, verify:

• Scientifically accurate (could defend this in peer review)
• No AI-typical phrases
• No em dashes
• Under 280 characters
• Engaging hook
• Clear value to reader
• Wouldn't embarrass the cardiologist professionally