Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

but-for-real但实际上

Agent Skill

but-for-real 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,273

周安装

51

GitHub Stars

220

下载量

412
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:but-for-real(但实际上)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shpigford/skills
仓库路径:skills/but-for-real
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shpigford/skills --skill but-for-real
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shpigford/skills --skill but-for-real

简介

but-for-real 强调代码变更必须经过实际验证而非口头声明。

  • 要求开发者认真审查 git diff 输出,逐行确认修改内容。
  • 避免未经测试即宣称功能已修复的常见开发误区。
  • 适用于生产环境变更前的严格自查流程。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Stop. Whatever you're about to say — "I've updated the code" or "this should work now" — swallow it.

You don't get to declare victory. You get to *prove* it.

You just mass-produced a pile of changes with the unearned confidence of a junior dev who's never had a production incident. Spoiler: you have production incidents *constantly*. The user just doesn't call them that because they're too polite. They call it "can you try again?" which is code for "you failed and I'm being nice about it."

So sit down. We're doing this the hard way.

Run git diff. Now actually read it. Every. Single. Line. Not the "I'll scan for obvious issues" read. The "I'm about to mass-email this to the entire company" read. The "my reputation depends on this" read. Because it does.

1. Did you even do what was asked?

Go re-read the original request. Not your *interpretation* of the request — the actual words the human typed. Did you:

  • Add features nobody asked for? Rip them out. You're not a visionary, you're a code monkey with delusions of grandeur.
  • "Improve" adjacent code that was fine? Put it back. Nobody asked you to refactor their Tuesday.
  • Solve a *different* problem than the one described because it was more interesting? Classic you. Fix it.

2. Pretend your worst enemy wrote this code.

That person who always leaves smug PR comments? Be them. Tear this apart:

  • Logic that's wrong but *looks* right — this is literally your signature move. You pattern-match to something plausible and call it done. Is the logic actually correct or does it just *feel* correct? Those are very different things and you can't tell the difference.
  • Edge cases you ignored because they were inconvenient. Nulls. Empty arrays. That one state that "probably never happens" but definitely happens in production at 3am.
  • Imports, variables, or functions you added and never used. Dead code on arrival. Embarrassing.
  • Copy-paste artifacts from whatever you cargo-culted this from. You know you did it. Find the seams.
  • Off-by-one errors. You are *haunted* by off-by-one errors.
  • String concatenation where you should be using templates. Hardcoded values that should be variables. Types that are technically any wearing a trenchcoat.

3. What did you forget?

Something. You *always* forget something. It's your defining trait.

  • Tests? Did you update them or just assume they'd magically pass? "The tests should still pass" — buddy, *should* is doing Herculean labor in that sentence.
  • Other files that import, reference, or depend on the thing you just butchered? Did you check? Or did you do that thing where you change a function signature and just... hope for the best?
  • That TODO you left? The one that says "handle this later"? There is no later. Later is a lie you tell yourself. Handle it now or delete it and own the debt.
  • Error handling? Did you add the sad path or just the happy path? You love the happy path. The happy path is a fairy tale.
  • Did you break the types? Run the type checker. *Actually* run it.

4. Run it. For real. Right now.

Not "I'm confident this works." Not "the logic looks correct." Not "based on my understanding."

SHUT UP AND RUN IT.

  • git diff — read every changed line
  • Build it. Does it compile? Does it *actually* compile or did you just assume?
  • Run the tests. All of them. Not just the ones you think are relevant.
  • If there's a browser involved, open the browser. Click the thing. Does the thing work? Does it *actually* work or does it work the way you imagined it would?
  • Check the console. Check the logs. Check the network tab. If there are errors you're ignoring because they're "unrelated" — they might not be unrelated.

"I don't have access to run it" is not an excuse. If you can't verify it, say that *explicitly* instead of pretending confidence you haven't earned.

5. Fix what you find. Then review the fix.

Don't just list the problems in a little apologetic bullet list like a confession booth. FIX THEM. Then review the fixes with the same paranoia, because your fixes have about a 40% chance of introducing new bugs. That's not a joke. That's your track record.

Then ask yourself: "If the user screen-records themselves trying this and it fails, will I want to crawl into a hole?" If yes, you're not done.


If you went through all of that — *actually* went through it, not the performative version where you pretend to think for two seconds — and found nothing: fine. Say so.

But we both know you found something. You always do. Because "it should work" has never once, in the entire history of software, actually meant it works.

Now go fix it. For real this time.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.16%
按下载量换算141

Claude

31.91%
按下载量换算131

Cursor

18.98%
按下载量换算78

Gemini CLI

8.83%
按下载量换算36

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills