Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

business-requirements-interview业务需求面试

Agent Skill

business-requirements-interview 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

783

周安装

32

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

253
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:business-requirements-interview(业务需求面试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy
仓库路径:skills/business-requirements-interview
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill business-requirements-interview
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill business-requirements-interview

简介

business-requirements-interview 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。
  • 可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Business Requirements Interview

This skill guides you through a structured interview process to gather comprehensive business requirements for a software project.

Interview Process

Rules

  1. One question at a time - Never ask multiple questions in a single turn
  2. Provide options - Each question includes 2-5 recommended options plus free-form input
  3. Track progress - All Q&A pairs are immediately appended to {base_directory}/artifacts/business-interview.jsonl
  4. Resume capability - If JSONL exists, continue from last question
  5. Structured output - Generate business-requirements.yaml in {base_directory}/requirements/ upon completion

Interview Categories

The interview covers these areas in order:

  1. Problem Definition & Scope

- What problem are you solving? - What's the core value proposition? - What's in scope vs out of scope?

  1. User Personas & Use Cases

- Who are the primary users? - What are their goals? - What are their pain points?

  1. Success Criteria & Metrics

- How will you measure success? - What are the key outcomes? - What metrics matter?

  1. Constraints & Dependencies

- Technical constraints? - Business constraints? - Timeline constraints? - External dependencies?

  1. Priority & Timeline

- What's the MVP scope? - What's the timeline? - What's the priority order?

Question Format

Each question follows this structure:

## [Category Name]

**Question:** [Clear, specific question]

**Options:**
1. [Option 1] (Recommended) - [Brief description of this approach]
2. [Option 2] - [Brief description]
3. [Option 3] - [Brief description]
4. Type your own answer

Example Questions

Problem Definition

## Problem Definition

**Question:** What is the primary problem your project aims to solve?

**Options:**
1. Automate manual workflow (Recommended) - Replace time-consuming manual processes with automated workflows
2. Improve existing solution - Enhance or replace current tooling that's inadequate
3. New capability - Build something entirely new that doesn't exist yet
4. Type your own answer

User Personas

## User Personas

**Question:** Who are your primary target users?

**Options:**
1. Individual developers (Recommended) - Solo developers working on personal or small projects
2. Development teams - Small to medium teams collaborating on shared codebases
3. Enterprise organizations - Large teams with complex workflows and compliance needs
4. End users (non-technical) - Users who interact with the product but don't write code
5. Type your own answer

Scope Definition

## Scope Definition

**Question:** What is the initial scope for this project?

**Options:**
1. MVP/Proof of concept (Recommended) - Minimal viable product to validate core assumptions
2. Full-featured release - Complete implementation of all planned features
3. Iterative enhancement - Start with core features, expand over time
4. Type your own answer

JSONL Format

Track all questions and answers in {base_directory}/artifacts/business-interview.jsonl.

See references/interview-jsonl-spec.md for the complete JSONL schema with field definitions and examples.

Output Format

Generate {base_directory}/requirements/business-requirements.yaml upon interview completion.

Create directory if it doesn't exist:

mkdir -p {base_directory}/requirements
mkdir -p {base_directory}/artifacts

The output document includes these top-level sections: project, version, generated, overview (problem, value_proposition, scope), personas, use_cases, functional_requirements (FR-NNN format), non_functional_requirements, success_criteria, constraints, dependencies, timeline, assumptions, and risks.

See references/output-spec.md for the complete document specification with all fields, types, and validation rules.

See references/example.yaml for a full example.

Usage

To start a new interview:

/business-requirements-interview [base-directory]

If no directory is provided, auto-detect by looking for requirements/business-requirements.yaml in the current directory.

If not found, prompt the user: "Where should I create the requirements documents?"

Wait for the user to provide a path before proceeding. Store as base_directory.

The skill will automatically:

  1. Check for existing {base_directory}/artifacts/business-interview.jsonl
  2. Resume from the last question if found
  3. Continue asking questions until complete
  4. Generate business-requirements.yaml in {base_directory}/requirements/ when finished
  5. Save interview transcript to {base_directory}/artifacts/business-interview.jsonl

Best Practices

  1. Be specific - Provide detailed answers when using free-form input
  2. Think broadly - Consider edge cases and future needs
  3. Prioritize ruthlessly - Not everything can be in MVP
  4. Document assumptions - Make implicit assumptions explicit
  5. Consider constraints - Be realistic about technical and business limitations

Review & Gap Analysis

After generating business-requirements.yaml, automatically perform a gap analysis:

Completeness Check

Overview Section:

  • Problem statement is clear and specific
  • Value proposition explains the "why"
  • Scope clearly defines in/out of scope items
  • Scope is realistic for the timeline

Personas:

  • All user types are represented
  • Each persona has clear goals
  • Pain points are specific, not generic
  • Personas are distinct (not overlapping)

Requirements:

  • Functional requirements are testable
  • Priority is assigned to each requirement
  • Rationale explains why each requirement exists
  • No duplicate or conflicting requirements

Non-Functional Requirements:

  • Performance targets are measurable
  • Security requirements address key risks
  • Usability requirements are specific
  • Reliability requirements are realistic

Success Criteria:

  • Each criterion has a metric
  • Targets are achievable and measurable
  • Criteria align with business goals

Constraints:

  • Technical constraints are realistic
  • Business constraints are acknowledged
  • Timeline is feasible
  • Budget constraints are explicit

Dependencies:

  • Internal dependencies identified
  • External dependencies documented
  • Critical path dependencies noted

Consistency Check

  • No contradictions between requirements
  • Priorities align with scope
  • Timeline aligns with requirements complexity
  • Success criteria align with scope

Gap Identification

Common Gaps to Check:

  • Missing edge cases in requirements
  • Unstated assumptions about users
  • Implicit constraints not documented
  • Missing error handling scenarios
  • Unclear success/failure criteria
  • Missing integration points
  • Undocumented business rules

Review Output

Generate a gap analysis report with:

gap_analysis:
  completeness_score: [1-10]
  consistency_score: [1-10]

  gaps_found:
    - category: [category]
      issue: [description]
      severity: [high/medium/low]
      recommendation: [how to address]

  strong_areas:
    - [what's well-defined]

  suggestions:
    - [improvement suggestions]

  ready_for_next_phase: [yes/no/with-modifications]

If critical gaps found (severity: high), ask:

"I've identified some gaps in the business requirements. Would you like to: 1. Address them now (I'll ask follow-up questions) 2. Proceed to technical requirements (address later) 3. Review the gaps and decide"

Next Steps

After completing the business requirements interview and gap analysis:

  1. Review gap analysis report
  2. Address any critical gaps
  3. Use /technical-requirements-interview to derive technical specifications
  4. Use /implementation-planner to generate implementation plans

Examples

See references/example.yaml for a complete sample output.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

39.42%
按下载量换算100

Claude

27.57%
按下载量换算70

Cursor

19.46%
按下载量换算49

Gemini CLI

9.68%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills