Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

business-evaluation业务评估

Agent Skill

business-evaluation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

539

周安装

22

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

174
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:business-evaluation(业务评估)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/business-evaluation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill business-evaluation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill business-evaluation

简介

执行分步骤的业务评估流程并跟踪每项任务的完成状态。

  • 严格按声明顺序执行技能步骤,禁止跳过或合并操作节点。
  • 每个步骤必须提供完成证据或明确的跳过理由说明。business-evaluation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 当外部工具不可用时需创建等效的任务进度跟踪机制。
  • 复杂工作前应先使用 TaskCreate 分解为最小可执行单元。

SKILL.md

[BLOCKING] Execute skill steps in declared order. NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval. [BLOCKING] Before each step or sub-skill call, update task tracking: set in_progress when step starts, set completed when step ends. [BLOCKING] Every completed/skipped step MUST include brief evidence or explicit skip reason. [BLOCKING] If Task tools are unavailable, create and maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with the same status transitions.
[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.
External Memory: For complex or lengthy work (research, analysis, scan, review), write intermediate findings and final results to a report file in plans/reports/ — prevents context loss and serves as deliverable.
Evidence Gate: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — every claim, finding, and recommendation requires file:line proof or traced evidence with confidence percentage (>80% to act, <80% must verify first).
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task: - Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. - Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. - Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. - Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. - When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. - Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. - Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. - Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. - Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. - Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.

Quick Summary

Goal: Evaluate business idea viability with BMC, financials, risk matrix, GTM, and execution plan.

Workflow:

  1. Capture idea — Problem, solution, target customer
  2. Load market analysis — Market data from market-analysis
  3. Business Model Canvas — All 9 blocks with evidence
  4. Financial projections — 3-year revenue, costs, break-even
  5. Risk assessment — 5+ risks with mitigation
  6. Execution plan — 3 phases with milestones
  7. Verdict — Viability score, confidence, recommendation

Key Rules:

  • All 9 BMC blocks required, each with evidence
  • Financial projections: explicit assumptions table
  • Minimum 5 risks with mitigation AND residual risk
  • Verdict must be evidence-backed with confidence declaration

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Business Evaluation

Step 1: Capture the Idea

From user input, extract:

  • One-liner — Elevator pitch in 1 sentence
  • Problem — What pain point does it solve?
  • Solution — How does it solve it?
  • Target customer — Who specifically benefits?

Step 2: Business Model Canvas

All 9 blocks required:

BlockKey QuestionEvidence Required
Customer SegmentsWho are we serving?Market research
Value PropositionsWhat value do we deliver?Customer pain points
ChannelsHow do we reach customers?Channel analysis
Customer RelationshipsHow do we maintain relationships?Retention strategy
Revenue StreamsHow do we make money?Pricing research
Key ResourcesWhat do we need?Resource assessment
Key ActivitiesWhat must we do?Operational analysis
Key PartnershipsWho helps us?Partner landscape
Cost StructureWhat does it cost?Cost analysis

Step 3: Financial Projections (3 Years)

Revenue Model

YearUsers/CustomersARPURevenueGrowth

Cost Structure

CategoryY1Y2Y3

Break-Even

  • Monthly burn: ${X}
  • Break-even point: Month/Year
  • Funding needed: ${X}

Assumptions Table

Every number must list its assumption and source.

Step 4: Risk Assessment

Minimum 5 risks:

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigationResidual Risk

Categories to consider: market, execution, financial, competitive, regulatory, technical.

Step 5: Execution Plan

PhaseTimelineFocusKey Milestones
Validation0-3 monthsCustomer discovery, MVPN interviews, prototype
Build3-6 monthsCore product, early usersBeta launch, first revenue
Growth6-12 monthsScale, optimizeRevenue target, team size

Step 6: Go-to-Market

  • Launch strategy — How to enter the market
  • Initial channels — Top 3 acquisition channels
  • Pricing strategy — Model + rationale + competitive comparison

Step 7: Verdict

  • Viability score: 1-10 with rationale
  • Confidence: 95%/80%/60%/<60% with evidence basis
  • Recommendation: Pursue | Pivot | Pause | Pass
  • Key condition: What must be true for this to succeed?

Output

Write to docs/knowledge/strategy/business/{descriptive-slug}.md using enforced template from .claude/templates/business-evaluation-template.md.


Next Steps

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS after completing this skill, you MUST ATTENTION use AskUserQuestion to present these options. Do NOT skip because the task seems "simple" or "obvious" — the user decides:

  • "/domain-analysis (Recommended)" — Analyze domain model from business evaluation
  • "/plan" — If ready to plan implementation
  • "Skip, continue manually" — user decides

Closing Reminders

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate decisions with user via AskUserQuestion — never auto-decide. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality.

  • MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
  • MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.

[IMPORTANT] Analyze how big the task is and break it into many small todo tasks systematically before starting — this is very important.

Prompt-Enhance Closing Anchors

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION follow declared step order for this skill; NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION for every step/sub-skill call: set in_progress before execution, set completed after execution
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every skipped step MUST include explicit reason; every completed step MUST include concise evidence
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION if Task tools unavailable, maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with synchronized statuses

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.92%
按下载量换算59

Claude

33.35%
按下载量换算58

Cursor

20%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

10.25%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills