Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

building-incident-response-playbook构建事件响应手册

Agent Skill

building-incident-response-playbook 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

618

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

5,936

下载量

216
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:building-incident-response-playbook(构建事件响应手册)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/building-incident-response-playbook
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill building-incident-response-playbook
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill building-incident-response-playbook

简介

用于编写标准化事件响应手册,覆盖检测、遏制、根除与恢复全流程操作指南。

  • 适用于新威胁场景的流程文档化、SOAR 平台自动化编排与合规审计准备。
  • 提供基于 MITRE ATT&CK 映射的响应步骤模板,支持定制化剧本与演练设计。
  • 安装使用 GitHub 仓库,需结合组织风险评估与现有 SOC 能力进行差距分析。
  • building-incident-response-playbook 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Building Incident Response Playbooks

When to Use

  • Establishing or maturing an incident response program from scratch
  • Documenting procedures for a new incident type after a novel attack
  • Automating response workflows in a SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR)
  • Preparing for compliance audits requiring documented IR procedures (SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA)
  • Conducting a gap analysis of existing IR capabilities against specific threat scenarios

Do not use for one-time ad hoc investigations; playbooks are reusable procedure documents, not case-specific reports.

Prerequisites

  • Organizational risk assessment identifying top incident scenarios by likelihood and impact
  • NIST SP 800-61r3 or SANS PICERL framework adopted as the organizational IR standard
  • Asset inventory with business criticality ratings and data classification
  • RACI chart defining roles: Incident Commander, SOC analysts, system administrators, legal, communications
  • Existing detection capabilities inventory (SIEM rules, EDR detections, IDS signatures)
  • SOAR platform access if building automated playbooks

Workflow

Step 1: Select and Scope the Incident Type

Define the specific scenario the playbook will address:

  • Identify the top incident types based on organizational risk assessment and historical data
  • Scope each playbook to a single incident type for clarity (do not combine unrelated scenarios)
  • Define trigger conditions that activate the playbook

Common playbook types:

Priority Playbooks (build first):
1. Ransomware incident response
2. Phishing/credential compromise
3. Business email compromise
4. Malware infection
5. Data breach/exfiltration
6. DDoS attack
7. Insider threat
8. Account takeover
9. Web application compromise
10. Cloud infrastructure compromise

Step 2: Define the Playbook Structure

Every playbook should follow a consistent structure:

PLAYBOOK TEMPLATE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Playbook Metadata
   - Name, version, owner, last review date
   - Trigger conditions
   - Severity criteria

2. RACI Matrix
   - Who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed for each step

3. Detection & Triage
   - How the incident is detected
   - Initial triage checklist
   - Severity classification criteria

4. Containment
   - Short-term containment actions
   - Long-term containment actions
   - Evidence preservation requirements

5. Eradication
   - Root cause identification
   - Malware/threat removal steps
   - Verification procedures

6. Recovery
   - System restoration steps
   - Validation criteria
   - Monitoring requirements post-recovery

7. Post-Incident
   - Lessons learned meeting trigger
   - Report template
   - Detection improvement actions

8. Communication
   - Internal notification matrix
   - External notification requirements (regulators, customers, law enforcement)
   - Status update cadence

9. Appendices
   - Tool-specific procedures
   - Contact lists
   - Evidence collection checklists

Step 3: Write Decision Trees and Escalation Criteria

Define clear decision points with binary outcomes:

Detection Alert Received
├── Is the alert a true positive?
│   ├── YES → Classify severity
│   │   ├── P1 (Critical) → Page incident commander, begin containment immediately
│   │   ├── P2 (High) → Notify IR lead, begin investigation within 30 min
│   │   ├── P3 (Medium) → Queue for investigation within 4 hours
│   │   └── P4 (Low) → Document and investigate within 24 hours
│   └── NO → Document as false positive, tune detection rule
└── Cannot determine → Escalate to Tier 2 for deeper analysis

Escalation triggers:

  • Any P1 incident: Immediate escalation to IR lead and CISO
  • Data exfiltration confirmed: Legal counsel and privacy officer notified
  • Customer data involved: Customer notification process activated
  • Third-party involvement: Vendor security contact engaged
  • Law enforcement needed: General counsel authorizes before contact

Step 4: Define Specific Technical Procedures

Write tool-specific instructions for each step (not generic guidance):

CONTAINMENT - Endpoint Isolation via CrowdStrike:
1. Open Falcon Console > Hosts > Search for affected hostname
2. Click on the host > Host Details
3. Click "Contain Host" button in upper right
4. Confirm isolation (host will only communicate with CrowdStrike cloud)
5. Document containment action in incident ticket with timestamp
6. Verify containment: Host should show "Contained" status badge

CONTAINMENT - Block C2 Domain at DNS:
1. SSH to DNS server: ssh admin@dns-primary.corp.local
2. Add to block zone: echo "zone evil.com { type master; file /etc/bind/db.sinkhole; };" >> /etc/bind/named.conf.local
3. Reload DNS: rndc reload
4. Verify: dig @dns-primary evil.com (should resolve to sinkhole IP 10.0.0.99)
5. Document blocked domain in incident ticket

Step 5: Integrate with SOAR Platform

Convert manual playbook steps into automated workflows:

  • Map each playbook step to a SOAR action (API call, script, human decision point)
  • Define automation boundaries (what runs automatically vs. what requires analyst approval)
  • Build enrichment automations for the triage phase
  • Create containment automations with approval gates for high-impact actions
  • Configure notification automations for stakeholder communication

Step 6: Test and Maintain the Playbook

Validate the playbook through exercises and maintain currency:

  • Conduct tabletop exercises with the IR team walking through the playbook
  • Perform live-fire exercises simulating the incident type in a test environment
  • Review and update after every real incident that uses the playbook
  • Schedule quarterly reviews for accuracy of contact lists, tool procedures, and escalation paths
  • Track playbook metrics: mean time to contain, mean time to resolve, false positive rate

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
PlaybookDocumented, repeatable set of procedures for responding to a specific incident type
RunbookMore granular than a playbook; step-by-step technical instructions for a specific task within a playbook
RACI MatrixResponsibility assignment chart defining who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each activity
Decision TreeFlowchart-based logic defining the response path based on binary conditions at each decision point
Escalation CriteriaPredefined conditions that trigger notification of higher-level personnel or external parties
SOAR PlaybookAutomated workflow in a Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response platform executing playbook steps

Tools & Systems

  • Cortex XSOAR: SOAR platform with visual playbook editor, 700+ integrations, and collaborative War Room
  • Splunk SOAR: SOAR platform integrated with Splunk ES, drag-and-drop playbook builder with 2,800+ automated actions
  • TheHive: Open-source incident response platform with case templates that function as playbook frameworks
  • Confluence / GitLab Wiki: Documentation platforms for maintaining human-readable playbook documents with version control
  • Tines: No-code security automation platform for building playbook workflows without programming

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Building a Phishing Response Playbook from Scratch

Context: An organization with a 5-person SOC has no documented phishing response procedure. Analysts handle phishing reports inconsistently.

Approach:

  1. Interview SOC analysts to document their current ad hoc process
  2. Define the trigger: user reports phishing email via abuse@ mailbox or phishing button
  3. Write triage steps: extract email headers, check sender reputation, analyze URLs/attachments in sandbox
  4. Define containment: quarantine email from all mailboxes, block sender domain, reset passwords if credentials entered
  5. Build SOAR automation: auto-extract IOCs from reported email, enrich via VirusTotal, create case in TheHive
  6. Test with simulated phishing email and measure response time improvement

Pitfalls:

  • Writing overly generic procedures that don't reference specific tool interfaces or commands
  • Not including the communication plan for notifying users who received the phishing email
  • Forgetting to define the criteria for when a phishing report becomes a full incident investigation
  • Not versioning the playbook or scheduling regular review cycles

Output Format

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAYBOOK
============================
Playbook Name:    Phishing Incident Response
Version:          2.1
Owner:            SOC Manager
Last Reviewed:    2025-11-01
Next Review:      2026-02-01
Trigger:          Phishing email reported via abuse@corp.com or phish button

RACI MATRIX
Activity                    | SOC L1 | SOC L2 | IR Lead | Legal | Comms
Initial Triage              |   R    |   C    |   I     |       |
Email Analysis              |   R    |   A    |   I     |       |
Containment                 |        |   R    |   A     |   I   |
Credential Reset            |        |   R    |   A     |       |
User Notification           |        |   C    |   A     |       |   R
Regulatory Notification     |        |        |   C     |   R   |   A
Lessons Learned             |   C    |   C    |   R     |   I   |   I

PROCEDURE STEPS
[Detailed steps with tool-specific instructions]

DECISION TREE
[Flowchart logic]

ESCALATION MATRIX
[Conditions and contacts]

METRICS
Target MTTA: 15 minutes
Target MTTC: 1 hour
Target MTTR: 4 hours

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.69%
按下载量换算79

Claude

27.16%
按下载量换算59

Cursor

18.01%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

8.63%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills