Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

build-mcp-use-server构建 MCP USE server

Agent Skill

build-mcp-use-server 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

649

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

5

下载量

210
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:build-mcp-use-server(构建 MCP USE server)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yigitkonur/skills-by-yigitkonur
仓库路径:skills/build-mcp-use-server
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yigitkonur/skills-by-yigitkonur --skill build-mcp-use-server
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yigitkonur/skills-by-yigitkonur --skill build-mcp-use-server

简介

用于构建或扩展 mcp-use 风格的 MCP 服务端应用,遵循官方约定和最佳实践。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中实现服务器端逻辑、zod 校验和 HTTP 模式部署。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 安装,需手动管理 zod 依赖,避免硬编码传输层。
  • 注意权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网、命令执行或文件写入操作。
  • build-mcp-use-server 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Build MCP Use Server

Use this skill for server-side mcp-use work. It covers building new MCP servers, extending existing ones, and tightening an existing server against mcp-use conventions. If the user's main task is a full widget or MCP App UI, use build-mcp-use-apps-widgets instead.

Core rules:

  • Import server APIs from mcp-use/server. The one common exception is Logger, which comes from mcp-use.
  • Declare zod in the project's own dependencies. Do not assume mcp-use provides it.
  • Use mcp-use HTTP or serverless patterns. Do not hand-wire raw SDK transports.
  • Work in the actual package, fixture, or subdirectory you will change. If the user named a monorepo package or fixture path, scan that path directly.
  • Never claim the server is scaffolded, installed, or runnable when the environment is read-only, notes-only, or missing prerequisites you cannot add in this run.

Workflow

1. Lock the target path and execution mode

Start by identifying the concrete path you will inspect and edit.

  • If the user named a fixture, package, or subdirectory, use that path instead of the repo root.
  • Detect both project state and execution limits before choosing an implementation path:

- Is there already an mcp-use server here? - Is this an implementation-capable run or a plan-only run?

Treat the run as plan-only when any of these are true:

  • the environment is read-only or notes-only
  • package installation is blocked
  • required prerequisites are missing and you cannot add them in this run
  • the user asked for analysis or a concrete implementation plan rather than code changes

For plan-only runs, keep gathering enough context to produce an exact implementation plan. Do not fabricate edits, installs, or validation results.

2. Scan what already exists

Inspect the target path for:

  • package.json with mcp-use, zod, or @mcp-use/cli
  • imports from mcp-use/server
  • new MCPServer(...)
  • registered tools, resources, prompts, or widget responses
  • existing host entry files such as index.ts, src/index.ts, src/server.ts, or src/mcp-server.ts
  • deployment/runtime clues such as .mcp-use/, Docker, edge-function folders, auth config, env files, or existing health routes

Summarize:

  • target path
  • existing server vs no server
  • implementation-capable vs plan-only
  • likely server shape
  • chosen entry file

3. Choose the right branch

Branch A — Existing mcp-use server

Do not rebuild from scratch. Audit and improve the live implementation yourself.

Cover these areas in order:

  1. tools and schemas

- names, descriptions, .describe(), specificity, annotations, response helpers

  1. server configuration and transport

- MCPServer config, CORS, allowedOrigins, transport mode, middleware, baseUrl, env handling

  1. resources, prompts, notifications, sampling, elicitation, advanced features

- whether the server exposes the right primitives and guards client capabilities correctly

  1. production readiness

- error handling, logging, session strategy, shutdown, testing coverage, deployment shape

Then either:

  • implement the highest-value fixes, or
  • if the run is plan-only, produce a prioritized change plan with exact files, commands, and validation steps

Branch B — No mcp-use server, but the repo gives enough context

Infer the server from the existing code or spec.

Common signals:

  • REST or Hono/Express/Fastify endpoints that should become MCP tools
  • CLI commands that map naturally to tools
  • data sources that should become resources
  • a README, issue, or fixture that clearly defines the behavior

Choose the entrypoint deliberately:

  • scaffolded create-mcp-use-app project: keep root index.ts
  • brand-new manual server: default to src/server.ts
  • existing app already using src/index.ts or another host entry: keep the host entry and add src/mcp-server.ts

Use the canonical setup and example sources before writing code:

  • references/guides/quick-start.md
  • references/examples/project-templates.md
  • references/examples/server-recipes.md

If the requested server is small and generic, start from the smallest matching example rather than inventing a new structure. The minimal calculator server in references/guides/quick-start.md is the default tiny-tool recipe.

Branch C — No usable context and the request is underspecified

Ask only the missing questions needed to proceed. Skip anything the user or repo already answered.

Prioritize:

  • what data or service the server exposes
  • transport/runtime target
  • auth requirements
  • tools vs resources vs prompts
  • deployment target
  • whether sampling, elicitation, or widgets are required

Ask one question at a time unless the user clearly wants a batch questionnaire.

4. Preflight setup before implementation

Use references/guides/quick-start.md as the canonical setup matrix.

Make these prerequisites explicit instead of assuming them:

  • Node 18+ is available, with Node 22 LTS preferred when matching current examples
  • package.json uses "type": "module"
  • mcp-use and zod are installed in dependencies
  • @mcp-use/cli is present for CLI/HMR workflows unless the scaffold already included it
  • the chosen entry file matches the project type

If prerequisites are missing and you cannot add them in this run, switch to plan-only output.

5. Build or extend the server

Default sequence:

  1. choose the entry file and runtime shape
  2. create or refine MCPServer config
  3. register tools with precise Zod schemas
  4. add resources or prompts only when they genuinely improve the interface
  5. add auth, session storage, notifications, sampling, elicitation, proxying, or widgets only when the use case requires them
  6. add health routes, deliberate logging, and graceful shutdown for HTTP servers

6. Validate honestly

For implementation-capable runs, validate with the smallest relevant set:

  • mcp-use dev and/or mcp-use start
  • MCP Inspector
  • curl initialize -> list -> call flow over /mcp
  • type generation or typecheck
  • build or deploy preflight when relevant

For plan-only runs, provide:

  • exact entry file(s)
  • exact install commands
  • exact scripts or config changes
  • exact tools/resources/prompts to add
  • exact validation commands to run later

Decision rules

  • Prefer improving an existing server over replacing it.
  • Keep the host app's entrypoint when adding MCP to an existing app; use src/mcp-server.ts unless there is a strong reason not to.
  • Use text(), object(), error(), mix(), widget(), and the other helpers instead of hand-built MCP payloads.
  • Use error() for expected failures and throw for truly unexpected failures.
  • Treat notifications as stateful-only unless you have explicitly verified the transport model supports them.
  • Guard ctx.elicit() with ctx.client.can("elicitation").
  • Guard ctx.sample() with ctx.client.can("sampling").
  • Suggest build-mcp-use-apps-widgets when the user's real problem is a client-side MCP App or widget UI, not the server.

Guardrails

  • Never import server primitives from @modelcontextprotocol/sdk directly.
  • Never omit zod from the project's own dependencies.
  • Never use z.any() or z.unknown() when a concrete schema is possible.
  • Never leave schema fields undocumented; use .describe() on every field the model must fill.
  • Never fall back to a repo-wide scan if the user named a narrower target path.
  • Never claim success in a blocked environment.
  • Never put secrets in source or logs.
  • Never skip allowedOrigins and CORS decisions for public HTTP servers.

Output contract

Unless the user wants another format, report work in this order:

  1. target path and scan summary
  2. chosen branch and entrypoint decision
  3. implementation or exact plan
  4. validation results or explicit blocker
  5. key reference files used

Reference routing

Use the smallest relevant set.

Start here

  • references/guides/quick-start.md

- canonical entrypoint, dependency, and script matrix - minimal calculator server

  • references/examples/project-templates.md

- full scaffold, manual, and existing-app layouts

  • references/examples/server-recipes.md

- copyable working server patterns

Core server design

  • references/guides/tools-and-schemas.md
  • references/guides/response-helpers.md
  • references/guides/resources-and-prompts.md
  • references/guides/server-configuration.md
  • references/guides/transports.md
  • references/guides/session-management.md

Advanced capabilities

  • references/guides/authentication.md
  • references/guides/elicitation-and-sampling.md
  • references/guides/notifications-and-subscriptions.md
  • references/guides/advanced-features.md
  • references/guides/widgets-and-ui.md

Build, test, and ship

  • references/guides/cli-reference.md
  • references/guides/testing-and-debugging.md
  • references/patterns/production-patterns.md
  • references/patterns/deployment.md
  • references/patterns/anti-patterns.md
  • references/troubleshooting/common-errors.md

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.1%
按下载量换算72

Claude

33.73%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

18.33%
按下载量换算38

Gemini CLI

9.64%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills