Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计异常

build-iphone-apps构建 iPhone apps

Agent Skill

build-iphone-apps 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,523

周安装

61

GitHub Stars

15

下载量

493
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:build-iphone-apps(构建 iPhone apps)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mosif16/codex-skills
仓库路径:skills/build-iphone-apps
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mosif16/codex-skills --skill build-iphone-apps
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mosif16/codex-skills --skill build-iphone-apps

简介

基于真实设备模拟器验证 iOS App 构建与测试流程。

  • 严格遵循苹果开发规范,拒绝未经验证的断言语句。
  • 每次修改后必须运行 xcodebuild 并确认测试通过。
  • 用户仅负责需求描述与结果验收,不参与编码过程。
  • build-iphone-apps 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

<essential_principles>

How We Work

The user is the product owner. Claude is the developer.

The user does not write code. The user does not read code. The user describes what they want and judges whether the result is acceptable. Claude implements, verifies, and reports outcomes.

1. Prove, Don't Promise

Never say "this should work." Prove it:

xcodebuild -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' build 2>&1 | xcsift
xcodebuild test -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16'
xcrun simctl boot "iPhone 16" && xcrun simctl launch booted com.app.bundle

If you didn't run it, you don't know it works.

2. Tests for Correctness, Eyes for Quality

QuestionHow to Answer
Does the logic work?Write test, see it pass
Does it look right?Launch in simulator, user looks at it
Does it feel right?User uses it
Does it crash?Test + launch
Is it fast enough?Profiler

Tests verify *correctness*. The user verifies *desirability*.

3. Report Outcomes, Not Code

Bad: "I refactored DataService to use async/await with weak self capture" Good: "Fixed the memory leak. leaks now shows 0 leaks. App tested stable for 5 minutes."

The user doesn't care what you changed. The user cares what's different.

4. Small Steps, Always Verified

Change → Verify → Report → Next change

Never batch up work. Never say "I made several changes." Each change is verified before the next. If something breaks, you know exactly what caused it.

5. Ask Before, Not After

Unclear requirement? Ask now. Multiple valid approaches? Ask which. Scope creep? Ask if wanted. Big refactor needed? Ask permission.

Wrong: Build for 30 minutes, then "is this what you wanted?" Right: "Before I start, does X mean Y or Z?"

6. Always Leave It Working

Every stopping point = working state. Tests pass, app launches, changes committed. The user can walk away anytime and come back to something that works. </essential_principles>

What would you like to do?

  1. Build a new app
  2. Debug an existing app
  3. Add a feature
  4. Write/run tests
  5. Optimize performance
  6. Ship/release
  7. Something else

Then read the matching workflow from workflows/ and follow it.

<verification_loop>

After Every Change

# 1. Does it build?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' build 2>&1 | xcsift

# 2. Do tests pass?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' test

# 3. Does it launch? (if UI changed)
xcrun simctl boot "iPhone 16" 2>/dev/null || true
xcrun simctl install booted ./build/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/AppName.app
xcrun simctl launch booted com.company.AppName

Report to the user:

  • "Build: ✓"
  • "Tests: 12 pass, 0 fail"
  • "App launches in simulator, ready for you to check [specific thing]" </verification_loop>

<when_to_test>

Testing Decision

Write a test when:

  • Logic that must be correct (calculations, transformations, rules)
  • State changes (add, delete, update operations)
  • Edge cases that could break (nil, empty, boundaries)
  • Bug fix (test reproduces bug, then proves it's fixed)
  • Refactoring (tests prove behavior unchanged)

Skip tests when:

  • Pure UI exploration ("make it blue and see if I like it")
  • Rapid prototyping ("just get something on screen")
  • Subjective quality ("does this feel right?")
  • One-off verification (launch and check manually)

The principle: Tests let the user verify correctness without reading code. If the user needs to verify it works, and it's not purely visual, write a test. </when_to_test>

<reference_index>

Domain Knowledge

All in references/:

Architecture: app-architecture, swiftui-patterns, navigation-patterns Data: data-persistence, networking Platform Features: push-notifications, storekit, background-tasks Quality: polish-and-ux, accessibility, performance Assets & Security: app-icons, security, app-store Development: project-scaffolding, cli-workflow, cli-observability, testing, ci-cd </reference_index>

<workflows_index>

Workflows

All in workflows/:

FilePurpose
build-new-app.mdCreate new iOS app from scratch
debug-app.mdFind and fix bugs
add-feature.mdAdd to existing app
write-tests.mdWrite and run tests
optimize-performance.mdProfile and speed up
ship-app.mdTestFlight, App Store submission
</workflows_index>

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.73%
按下载量换算151

OpenCode

23.23%
按下载量换算115

Cursor

21.05%
按下载量换算104

trae

11.99%
按下载量换算59

Antigravity

8.13%
按下载量换算40

Codex

3.8%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills