Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

execute-plan执行计划

Agent Skill

execute-plan 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

7,822

周安装

336

GitHub Stars

45

下载量

2,742
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:execute-plan(执行计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/buiducnhat/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/execute-plan
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/buiducnhat/agent-skills --skill execute-plan
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/buiducnhat/agent-skills --skill execute-plan

简介

execute-plan 用于严格按照预批准计划执行任务,确保范围、顺序和验证环节准确无误。

  • 它加载计划摘要并分批次执行子任务,支持并行与串行调度,并在遇到问题时暂停等待确认。
  • 使用时需提供计划路径(如 docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-plan-slug/SUMMARY.md),不得在过程中 redesign 计划。
  • 安装前请确认仓库权限、维护状态,以及是否会触发文件读写、测试运行或外部服务调用。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Execute Plan

Overview

Execute a pre-approved plan with strict adherence to scope, sequence, and verification.

The input is typically: execute-plan docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>/SUMMARY.md

Do not redesign the plan during execution. If ambiguity or blockers appear, stop and ask.

Workflow

Step 1: Initialize

  1. Locate Plan

- Confirm the plan path exists and is readable. - If a directory is provided, locate SUMMARY.md inside it.

  1. Load Execution Context

- Load project context per the shared Context Loading Protocol. - Review the plan’s phase files and dependencies.

  1. Select Execution Mode (Explicit Rule)

- Default mode: Batch - Use Interactive when any of the following is true: - High-risk changes (auth, payments, migrations, security-critical logic) - Irreversible operations (data migrations, destructive scripts) - Unclear acceptance criteria - User explicitly requests checkpoints - If mode is unclear, ask once and proceed with user choice.

  1. Find Next Pending Phase

- First [] phase - If none, first [-] phase - If no pending/in-progress phases remain, go to final verification.

  1. Critical Plan Sanity Check

- Ensure each phase has: - clear objective - file targets - verification commands - If essential details are missing or contradictory, stop and request clarification.

Step 2: Execute Per-Phase Loop

For each phase in order:

  1. Skip Completed

- If status is [x], continue to next phase.

  1. Mark In Progress

- Update phase status to [-] before making changes.

  1. Execute Exactly

- Implement only the tasks defined in that phase. - Do not expand scope without approval. - Write the minimum code that satisfies the phase. No speculative features, no abstractions for single-use code, no error handling for impossible scenarios. See Simplicity first and Surgical changes rules below.

  1. Verify Phase

- Run the phase-specific verification commands from the plan. - At minimum, run relevant tests/checks tied to touched files.

  1. Handle Failures

- If verification fails: - Attempt focused fixes within phase scope. - Re-run verification. - If still failing or root cause is outside scope, stop and report blocker.

  1. Mark Complete

- Update phase status to [x] only after verification passes.

  1. Progress Report

- Interactive mode: report and wait for confirmation before next phase. - Batch mode: report briefly and continue immediately.

Step 3: Final Verification

After all phases are complete:

  1. Project-Wide Validation

- Run full lint/type-check suite - Run all relevant tests (or full test suite if required by the plan) - Run build verification if applicable

  1. Stabilize

- Fix regressions introduced during execution. - Re-run failed checks until green or blocked.

  1. Manual Validation Checkpoint

- If user/manual QA is required, ask explicitly and pause: - Verified to accept - or provide feedback for follow-up iteration

Step 4: Completion Artifacts

  1. Documentation Sync

- If behavior/architecture/codebase expectations changed, update the docs artifacts.

  1. Create Execution Report

- File: docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>/EXECUTION-REPORT.md - Include all required sections below.

  1. Archive Plan Folder

- Move the plan folder to docs/plans/archived/ after the execution report is created. - Command: mkdir -p docs/plans/archived && mv docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug> docs/plans/archived/

  1. Announce Completion

- Output: Execution complete. Report archived at docs/plans/archived/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>/EXECUTION-REPORT.md.

Step 5: Final Confirmation Gate

After completion artifacts are done, ask the user for a final confirmation using the Question Tool with exactly these options:

  • Confirm: End session
  • Confirm and Auto commit git
  • Need verify

Handle the selected option as follows:

  1. Confirm: End session

- End the execution session.

  1. Confirm and Auto commit git

- Trigger the git-commit skill and complete an automatic commit flow. - After commit succeeds, end the execution session.

  1. Confirm and update documentation

- Use skill /docs to update the relevant documentation files with any changes made during execution. - After documentation is updated, end the execution session.

  1. Confirm and update documentation and auto commit git

- Use skill /docs to update the relevant documentation files with any changes made during execution. - Trigger the git-commit skill and complete an automatic commit flow. - After commit succeeds, end the execution session.

  1. Need verify

- Allow the user to provide verification feedback/details. - Continue the execution loop to address feedback, then re-run verification and completion steps as needed.

Execution Report Standard

EXECUTION-REPORT.md must use the following template: references/execution-report-template.md

Rules

  • Respect project standards: follow docs/ and related project docs.
  • Follow the plan strictly: no silent scope changes.
  • Stop on blocker: missing dependency, contradictory instructions, or unexplained failures.
  • No guessing: ask for clarification when uncertain.
  • Verify before complete: never mark phase done without passing checks.
  • Idempotency: prefer safe/re-runnable operations.
  • Simplicity first: Implement the minimum code that satisfies the phase's exit criteria. No features beyond what the plan asks for. No abstractions for single-use code. No configurability that wasn't requested. If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
  • Surgical changes: Touch only what the phase requires. Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting. Don't refactor things that aren't broken. Match existing style even if you'd do it differently. Only remove imports/variables/functions that *your* changes orphaned — don't delete pre-existing dead code unless the plan asks for it. Every changed line should trace to a phase task.
  • Do not skip workflow steps: initialization, per-phase verification, final verification, and reporting are all mandatory.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.79%
按下载量换算1,036

Claude

25.95%
按下载量换算712

Cursor

17.91%
按下载量换算491

Gemini CLI

8.99%
按下载量换算247

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills