Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

bug-root-cause-finder错误根本原因查找器

Agent Skill

bug-root-cause-finder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

288

周安装

12

GitHub Stars

66

下载量

96
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bug-root-cause-finder(错误根本原因查找器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code
仓库路径:skills/bug-root-cause-finder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code --skill bug-root-cause-finder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code --skill bug-root-cause-finder

简介

bug-root-cause-finder 应用 5 Whys 等技术穿透表象寻找真实根源,而非停留于症状层面。

  • 适用于复杂系统中多层级故障传导场景,例如订单金额错误背后的消息丢失问题。
  • 提供多种方法论选项包括日志分析、状态比对与依赖追踪,适配不同技术栈特点。
  • 强调证据驱动决策,拒绝主观臆断,所有推论必须基于可观测事实支撑。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Bug Root Cause Finder

Systematic methods for finding the true source of bugs, not just symptoms.

Core Principle: Symptom ≠ Cause

The location where an error manifests is rarely where the bug originates.

Error Location:     OrderController::show() - NullPointerException
Symptom Location:   OrderRepository::find() - returns null
Root Cause:         OrderCreatedHandler - failed to persist order
True Root Cause:    RabbitMQ message lost due to missing ACK

Method 1: 5 Whys Technique

Ask "why" repeatedly until you reach the root cause.

Example Analysis

Bug: "Customer sees wrong order total"

  1. Why? → The total displayed is $0
  2. Why?Order::getTotal() returns 0
  3. Why?OrderItem collection is empty
  4. Why? → Items weren't loaded from database
  5. Why? → Lazy loading failed due to closed EntityManager

Root Cause: EntityManager closed before accessing lazy-loaded collection

Fix: Eager load items in repository query, not lazy load

5 Whys Template

## 5 Whys Analysis

**Bug Description:** [What user sees]

1. Why does [symptom] occur?
   → [First-level cause]

2. Why does [first-level cause] happen?
   → [Second-level cause]

3. Why does [second-level cause] happen?
   → [Third-level cause]

4. Why does [third-level cause] happen?
   → [Fourth-level cause]

5. Why does [fourth-level cause] happen?
   → [ROOT CAUSE]

**Fix Location:** [File:line where fix should be applied]
**Fix Type:** [Category: logic/null/boundary/race/resource/exception/type/sql/infinite]

Method 2: Fault Tree Analysis

Build a tree of all possible causes for a failure.

Fault Tree Structure

[FAILURE: Order total is $0]
        │
        ├── [OR] Order has no items
        │       ├── [AND] Items not added during creation
        │       │       ├── Cart was empty
        │       │       └── Cart-to-Order mapping failed
        │       │
        │       └── [AND] Items were deleted
        │               ├── Cascade delete triggered
        │               └── Manual deletion bug
        │
        └── [OR] Items exist but total calculation wrong
                ├── Price is 0
                │       ├── Product price not set
                │       └── Currency conversion failed
                │
                └── Quantity is 0
                        ├── Validation missing
                        └── Type coercion (string "0")

Fault Tree Investigation Order

  1. Start with most likely branches (based on code review)
  2. Add logging/debugging to verify each branch
  3. Eliminate branches systematically
  4. Focus on remaining possibilities

Method 3: Git Bisect

Find the exact commit that introduced a bug.

Git Bisect Steps

# 1. Start bisect
git bisect start

# 2. Mark current (broken) as bad
git bisect bad

# 3. Mark known good commit (e.g., last release)
git bisect good v2.3.0

# 4. Git checks out middle commit - test it
# Run your reproduction test
php artisan test --filter=OrderTotalTest

# 5. Mark result
git bisect good  # if test passes
git bisect bad   # if test fails

# 6. Repeat until Git finds the culprit commit
# Git will output: "abc123 is the first bad commit"

# 7. Examine the commit
git show abc123

# 8. End bisect
git bisect reset

Automated Git Bisect

# Run automatically with test script
git bisect start HEAD v2.3.0
git bisect run php artisan test --filter=OrderTotalTest

Git Bisect Tips

  • Choose good boundaries: Bad = current, Good = last known working
  • Use automated testing: Faster and more reliable
  • Check for flaky tests: Bisect fails with inconsistent tests
  • Look at the diff: Focus on changed lines in culprit commit

Method 4: Stack Trace Parsing

Extract actionable information from error traces.

PHP Stack Trace Structure

Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: OrderService::calculateTotal():
Argument #1 ($items) must be of type array, null given,
called in /app/src/Application/UseCase/CreateOrderUseCase.php on line 45

Stack trace:
#0 /app/src/Application/UseCase/CreateOrderUseCase.php(45): OrderService->calculateTotal(NULL)
#1 /app/src/Presentation/Api/OrderController.php(32): CreateOrderUseCase->execute(Object(CreateOrderCommand))
#2 /app/vendor/symfony/http-kernel/HttpKernel.php(163): OrderController->create(Object(Request))
#3 /app/vendor/symfony/http-kernel/HttpKernel.php(75): HttpKernel->handleRaw(Object(Request))
#4 /app/public/index.php(25): HttpKernel->handle(Object(Request))
#5 {main}

thrown in /app/src/Domain/Service/OrderService.php on line 23

Key Information to Extract

ElementValueMeaning
Error TypeTypeErrorType mismatch bug
MessageArgument #1 must be array, null givenNull pointer issue
Thrown LocationOrderService.php:23Where error detected
Call LocationCreateOrderUseCase.php:45Where bad value passed
Root InvestigationCreateOrderUseCase.php:45Start here

Stack Trace Analysis Steps

  1. Read error message - What type of error?
  2. Find thrown location - Where was error detected?
  3. Find call location - Where was bad value passed?
  4. Trace backward - How did bad value get there?
  5. Find origin - Where was value first set to bad state?

Common Stack Trace Patterns

Pattern: Null from Repository

#0 Repository->find() returns null
#1 Service uses result without check
#2 Controller calls service

→ Fix in #1: Add null check

Pattern: Type Coercion

#0 Method expects int, gets string
#1 Request data not validated
#2 Controller passes raw input

→ Fix in #1 or #2: Add validation/casting

Pattern: Missing Dependency

#0 Service->method() called
#1 Container->get() fails
#2 Dependency not registered

→ Fix: Register dependency in container

Method 5: Dependency Graph Analysis

Trace data flow through the application.

Data Flow Tracing

// Trace the flow of $orderId
1. Controller receives $orderId from Request
2. UseCase receives $orderId as Command property
3. Repository uses $orderId in SQL query
4. Database returns null (ID doesn't exist)
5. UseCase passes null to Service
6. Service throws NullPointerException

Dependency Questions

  • Where does the value originate?
  • What transformations does it undergo?
  • Where is it validated?
  • Where could it become invalid?
  • Who else uses this value?

Call Graph Investigation

# Find all callers of a method
grep -r "->calculateTotal(" src/

# Find all places where variable is set
grep -r "\$items\s*=" src/

# Find all null assignments
grep -r "= null" src/Domain/

Method 6: State Timeline Reconstruction

Rebuild the sequence of state changes.

Timeline Template

## State Timeline

T0: Initial state
    - Order::status = DRAFT
    - Order::items = []

T1: AddItemToOrder executed
    - Order::items = [Item(id=1)]
    - Expected: status stays DRAFT ✓

T2: SubmitOrder executed
    - Order::status = SUBMITTED
    - Expected: items preserved ✓

T3: PaymentReceived event
    - Order::status = PAID
    - BUG: items cleared unexpectedly ✗

T4: GetOrder query
    - Returns Order with empty items
    - User sees $0 total

Root Cause: PaymentReceived handler incorrectly reinitializes Order

Investigation Checklist

Before Starting

  • Reproduce bug consistently
  • Identify exact error message
  • Note conditions when bug occurs
  • Check if bug is environment-specific

During Investigation

  • Parse stack trace for key locations
  • Apply 5 Whys technique
  • Build fault tree if multiple possible causes
  • Use git bisect if recent regression
  • Trace data flow from origin to error

After Finding Root Cause

  • Verify fix addresses root cause, not symptom
  • Check for similar bugs in related code
  • Document root cause for team knowledge
  • Consider if design change prevents recurrence

Quick Reference: Where to Look First

Bug TypeFirst Investigation Point
Null pointerRepository/Factory that creates the null
Wrong calculationInput values, not calculation logic
Missing dataEvent handler or background job
Intermittent failureShared state or race condition
After deploymentGit diff between versions
Only in productionEnvironment config or data
Only for some usersUser-specific data or permissions

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.18%
按下载量换算36

Claude

31.15%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

18.87%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

10.32%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills