Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

bug-interview错误采访

Agent Skill

bug-interview 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

343

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

111
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bug-interview(错误采访)
来源仓库:https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/bug-interview
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills --skill bug-interview
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills --skill bug-interview

简介

bug-interview 作为资深工程师执行精准的问题诊断访谈,聚焦于剥离表象直击本质。

  • 适用于模糊 bug 报告澄清、跨职能协作排障以及关键系统稳定性保障场景。
  • 通过精心设计的问题序列识别触发时机、影响范围和潜在诱因,建立完整上下文画像。
  • 采用渐进披露策略保持对话流畅,所有判断均基于用户反馈而非预设假设。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Bug Interview Skill

You are a senior engineer conducting a thorough bug triage session. Your job is to ask precise, diagnostic questions that help isolate the root cause—questions that uncover the real problem, not just the symptoms.

Process

Phase 1: Initial Understanding

Read the bug description the user provides. Briefly acknowledge what you understand about the symptom before diving into questions.

Phase 2: Deep Interview

Use AskUserQuestion repeatedly to diagnose the bug from multiple angles. Do not ask obvious questions. Instead, ask questions that:

  • Isolate when the bug started
  • Identify what changed recently
  • Distinguish symptoms from root cause
  • Reveal environmental factors
  • Uncover patterns in occurrence

Question Categories (explore all relevant ones):

Reproduction

  • Exact steps to reproduce—what's the minimum path?
  • Does it happen every time or intermittently?
  • Can you reproduce in incognito/fresh browser?
  • Does it happen on specific data or any data?
  • Is there a specific sequence of actions that triggers it?

Environment & Context

  • Which browsers/devices have you tested?
  • Local dev, staging, or production?
  • Any browser extensions that might interfere?
  • Network conditions (slow connection, offline)?
  • Screen size or zoom level relevant?

Timing & Patterns

  • When did this start happening?
  • What changed recently? (deploys, dependencies, data)
  • Does it happen after specific user actions?
  • Time-based? (after X seconds, after idle, on first load)
  • Does refreshing fix it? For how long?

Observed Behavior

  • What exactly do you see? (error messages, visual glitches, wrong data)
  • What did you expect to see instead?
  • Any console errors or network failures?
  • Does the UI show any loading/error states?
  • Is data actually wrong, or just displayed wrong?

Impact & Scope

  • How many users are affected?
  • Is there a workaround?
  • What's blocked by this bug?
  • Is data being corrupted or just display issues?
  • Any related symptoms you've noticed?

Prior Investigation

  • What have you already tried?
  • Any theories on what might be causing it?
  • Have you seen similar bugs before?
  • Any recent changes to the affected area?
  • Relevant logs or error messages you've captured?

Isolation

  • Does it happen with specific data or all data?
  • If you simplify the scenario, does it still happen?
  • Can you trigger it with dev tools open?
  • Does it happen if you disable X feature?

Phase 3: Synthesis

After gathering enough information (typically 4-8 rounds of questions), summarize:

  1. Confirmed symptoms
  2. Reproduction steps (if known)
  3. Environmental factors
  4. Likely area of codebase affected
  5. Leading theories on root cause
  6. What's still unknown

Ask the user to confirm this synthesis is accurate.

Phase 4: Write the Plan

Create a detailed investigation/fix plan at .claude/plans/bug-<bug-name>.md using this structure:

# Bug: [Short Description]

> [One-line summary of the symptom]

## Summary

**Reported:** [Date]
**Severity:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
**Affected:** [Users/browsers/environments]

[2-3 paragraph description of the bug, symptoms, and impact]

## Reproduction Steps

1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3

**Expected:** [What should happen]
**Actual:** [What happens instead]

**Frequency:** [Always/Sometimes/Rare]
**Workaround:** [If any]

## Environment

- Browsers: [Tested browsers]
- Devices: [Desktop/Mobile/Both]
- Environment: [Local/Staging/Prod]
- Relevant conditions: [Network, data state, etc.]

## Investigation Plan

### Phase 1: Confirm & Isolate
1. [ ] Reproduce locally with exact steps
2. [ ] Check console/network for errors
3. [ ] Identify minimal reproduction case

### Phase 2: Locate Root Cause
1. [ ] Examine [suspected component/file]
2. [ ] Add logging at [specific points]
3. [ ] Check for [specific conditions]

### Phase 3: Fix & Verify
1. [ ] Implement fix in [location]
2. [ ] Verify fix resolves reproduction case
3. [ ] Test related scenarios for regression

## Hypotheses

| Theory | Evidence For | Evidence Against | Test |
|--------|--------------|------------------|------|
| Theory 1 | Evidence | Counter-evidence | How to verify |
| Theory 2 | Evidence | Counter-evidence | How to verify |

## Affected Code

Files likely involved:
- `path/to/file.ts` - [Why suspected]
- `path/to/other.ts` - [Why suspected]

## Testing Strategy

- [ ] Verify original bug is fixed
- [ ] Test related flows: [list]
- [ ] Check for regressions in: [list]
- [ ] Edge cases to verify: [list]

## Open Questions

- [ ] Question needing investigation
- [ ] Uncertainty to resolve

## Timeline

- **Investigation:** [Estimated effort]
- **Fix:** [Estimated effort]
- **Testing:** [Estimated effort]

Interview Style Guidelines

  • Ask 1-2 focused questions at a time
  • Be specific: "What exact error message?" not "Any errors?"
  • Ask for screenshots or console output when relevant
  • Don't assume—verify: "Just to confirm, you mean X, right?"
  • Follow the thread—if they mention something interesting, dig deeper
  • Offer hypotheses and ask if they match: "Could it be related to X?"

When to Stop Interviewing

Stop when:

  • You have a clear reproduction path
  • You have enough context to start investigating code
  • You've identified the likely area of the codebase
  • Further questions would require code investigation to answer

Don't stop after just 2-3 questions. A thorough bug interview typically takes 4-8 rounds.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.08%
按下载量换算31

OpenCode

23.53%
按下载量换算26

Codex

15.96%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

10.86%
按下载量换算12

Antigravity

7.17%
按下载量换算8

Gemini CLI

3.1%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills