Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

break-loopbreak loop 命令行

Agent Skill

break-loop 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

609

周安装

34

GitHub Stars

6,617

下载量

280
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:break-loop(break loop 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mindfold-ai/trellis
仓库路径:skills/break-loop
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mindfold-ai/trellis --skill break-loop
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mindfold-ai/trellis --skill break-loop

简介

用于深度分析已修复 bug 的根本原因,防止同类问题复发。

  • 从缺失规范、跨层契约等五个维度进行根因归类。
  • 输出改进建议与预防措施,形成闭环管理。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 需结合最近一次修复上下文,禁止泛化分析。
  • break-loop 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Break the Loop - Deep Bug Analysis

When debug is complete, use this skill for deep analysis to break the "fix bug -> forget -> repeat" cycle.


Analysis Framework

Analyze the bug you just fixed from these 5 dimensions:

1. Root Cause Category

Which category does this bug belong to?

CategoryCharacteristicsExample
A. Missing SpecNo documentation on how to do itNew feature without checklist
B. Cross-Layer ContractInterface between layers unclearAPI returns different format than expected
C. Change Propagation FailureChanged one place, missed othersChanged function signature, missed call sites
D. Test Coverage GapUnit test passes, integration failsWorks alone, breaks when combined
E. Implicit AssumptionCode relies on undocumented assumptionTimestamp seconds vs milliseconds

2. Why Fixes Failed (if applicable)

If you tried multiple fixes before succeeding, analyze each failure:

  • Surface Fix: Fixed symptom, not root cause
  • Incomplete Scope: Found root cause, didn't cover all cases
  • Tool Limitation: grep missed it, type check wasn't strict
  • Mental Model: Kept looking in same layer, didn't think cross-layer

3. Prevention Mechanisms

What mechanisms would prevent this from happening again?

TypeDescriptionExample
DocumentationWrite it down so people knowUpdate thinking guide
ArchitectureMake the error impossible structurallyType-safe wrappers
Compile-timeTypeScript strict, no anySignature change causes compile error
RuntimeMonitoring, alerts, scansDetect orphan entities
Test CoverageE2E tests, integration testsVerify full flow
Code ReviewChecklist, PR template"Did you check X?"

4. Systematic Expansion

What broader problems does this bug reveal?

  • Similar Issues: Where else might this problem exist?
  • Design Flaw: Is there a fundamental architecture issue?
  • Process Flaw: Is there a development process improvement?
  • Knowledge Gap: Is the team missing some understanding?

5. Knowledge Capture

Solidify insights into the system:

  • Update .trellis/spec/guides/ thinking guides
  • Update .trellis/spec/backend/ or frontend/ docs
  • Create issue record (if applicable)
  • Create feature ticket for root fix
  • Update check skills if needed

Output Format

Please output analysis in this format:

## Bug Analysis: [Short Description]

### 1. Root Cause Category
- **Category**: [A/B/C/D/E] - [Category Name]
- **Specific Cause**: [Detailed description]

### 2. Why Fixes Failed (if applicable)
1. [First attempt]: [Why it failed]
2. [Second attempt]: [Why it failed]
...

### 3. Prevention Mechanisms
| Priority | Mechanism | Specific Action | Status |
|----------|-----------|-----------------|--------|
| P0 | ... | ... | TODO/DONE |

### 4. Systematic Expansion
- **Similar Issues**: [List places with similar problems]
- **Design Improvement**: [Architecture-level suggestions]
- **Process Improvement**: [Development process suggestions]

### 5. Knowledge Capture
- [ ] [Documents to update / tickets to create]

Core Philosophy

The value of debugging is not in fixing the bug, but in making this class of bugs never happen again.

Three levels of insight:

  1. Tactical: How to fix THIS bug
  2. Strategic: How to prevent THIS CLASS of bugs
  3. Philosophical: How to expand thinking patterns

30 minutes of analysis saves 30 hours of future debugging.


After Analysis: Immediate Actions

IMPORTANT: After completing the analysis above, you MUST immediately:

  1. Update spec/guides - Don't just list TODOs, actually update the relevant files:

- If it's a cross-platform issue → update cross-platform-thinking-guide.md - If it's a cross-layer issue → update cross-layer-thinking-guide.md - If it's a code reuse issue → update code-reuse-thinking-guide.md - If it's domain-specific → update backend/*.md or frontend/*.md

  1. Sync templates - After updating .trellis/spec/, sync to src/templates/markdown/spec/
  2. Commit the spec updates - This is the primary output, not just the analysis text
The analysis is worthless if it stays in chat. The value is in the updated specs.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.03%
按下载量换算104

Claude

31.35%
按下载量换算88

Cursor

19.49%
按下载量换算55

Gemini CLI

8.67%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills