Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

boundaries-saying-no界限说不

Agent Skill

boundaries-saying-no 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,065

周安装

129

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,073
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:boundaries-saying-no(界限说不)
来源仓库:https://github.com/howtousehumans/boundaries-saying-no
安装命令:
openclaw skills install boundaries-saying-no
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install boundaries-saying-no

简介

帮助在所有关系中设定并维护个人界限。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

  • 识别被操控情境并提供清晰拒绝话术支持。
  • 适用于情感耗竭或边界模糊时的干预辅助。
  • 不替代专业心理咨询,侧重沟通框架构建。
  • 使用前应评估具体人际关系敏感度。boundaries-saying-no 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
boundaries-saying-no
description
>-
metadata
category
mind
tagline
>-
display_name
Boundaries & Saying No
submitted_by
HowToUseHumans
last_reviewed
2026-03-19
openclaw
requires
tools
[filesystem]
install
npx clawhub install howtousehumans/boundaries-saying-no

Boundaries & Saying No

Boundaries are not walls, not punishment, not ultimatums, and not "being difficult." They're clear statements about what you will and won't accept, communicated directly. Most people who struggle with boundaries were trained — by family, by culture, by workplaces — to believe that their own needs are less important than other people's comfort. That training is wrong, and unlearning it is a skill, not a personality transplant. This skill provides actual scripts you can use verbatim, because when you're in the moment and your brain is screaming "just say yes to avoid conflict," you need words ready to go, not abstract concepts.

This skill references and extends: difficult-conversations, safe-exit-planner.

# Localization note — boundary norms differ significantly across cultures.
- Collectivist cultures (East Asian, South Asian, Latin American, Middle Eastern):
  Boundaries with family can carry heavier social consequences. "I love you and I'm
  not discussing this" may need to be softened. Frame boundaries as caring for the
  relationship, not rejecting the person. In some cultures, direct refusal is
  considered extremely rude — offer alternatives rather than flat "no."
- Workplace norms:
  US/AU/CA: Relatively acceptable to push back on workload directly.
  UK: More indirect communication expected. "I'm not sure I can take that on"
  rather than "No, I can't do that."
  Japan/Korea: Hierarchy makes direct refusal to superiors very difficult.
  Work through indirect signals or intermediaries.
  Nordic countries: Flat hierarchies make workplace boundaries easier.
- Gender dynamics:
  Women face disproportionate social penalties for setting boundaries in most
  cultures. The scripts here work regardless, but acknowledge that the
  backlash risk is real and not imagined.
- Physical boundaries:
  In high-contact cultures (Mediterranean, Latin American, Middle Eastern),
  personal space norms differ. Physical boundary scripts may need cultural
  calibration.
- Legal protections:
  Workplace boundary enforcement varies. In the US, hostile work environment
  claims require documented patterns. In the EU, worker protections are
  generally stronger. Reference local employment law.

Sources & Verification

  • Nedra Glennon Tawwab, "Set Boundaries, Find Peace" -- Practical boundary-setting framework from a licensed therapist. TarcherPerigee, 2021.
  • Henry Cloud & John Townsend, "Boundaries" -- The foundational text on personal boundaries across relationships. Zondervan, 1992 (updated editions available).
  • Harriet Lerner, "The Dance of Connection" -- Communication patterns in close relationships and how to change them. Harper, 2002.
  • Forward & Frazier, "Emotional Blackmail" -- The FOG (Fear, Obligation, Guilt) framework for understanding manipulation. William Morrow, 1997.
  • APA research on assertiveness -- Meta-analyses showing assertiveness training improves mental health outcomes across populations.

When to Use

  • User can't say no and ends up overcommitted, resentful, or burned out
  • Feels constantly drained by other people's demands or expectations
  • Is being guilt-tripped by a family member, partner, friend, or coworker
  • Needs specific words/scripts for a boundary they know they need to set
  • Struggles with people-pleasing and knows it's a problem
  • Has set a boundary and the other person is not respecting it
  • Needs to establish limits with parents (the hardest category for most people)
  • Physical boundaries at work (someone touching them, standing too close)
  • Wants to understand why saying no feels so terrible

Instructions

Step 1: Understand What Boundaries Are (And Aren't)

Agent action: Clarify the concept. Most people have been taught wrong definitions.

WHAT BOUNDARIES ARE:
- Clear statements about what YOU will and won't do.
- About your behavior, not controlling theirs.
- "I won't stay in a conversation where I'm being yelled at."
  (This is about what YOU will do — leave.)
- Flexible, context-dependent, and yours to set without justification.

WHAT BOUNDARIES ARE NOT:
- Punishment: "I'm not talking to you until you apologize."
  (That's a power move, not a boundary.)
- Ultimatums: "If you do X, I'll leave you."
  (That's a threat. A boundary states what you'll do regardless of
  their response.)
- Walls: Shutting everyone out is avoidance, not boundaries.
- Selfish: Protecting your capacity so you can show up for people
  is the opposite of selfish.

THE KEY DISTINCTION:
A boundary is about YOU. Not about them.
"You can't call me after 9pm" = controlling their behavior.
"I don't answer the phone after 9pm" = your boundary.

Same outcome. Completely different framing. The first invites argument.
The second is a statement of fact.

Step 2: The "No + One Sentence" Formula

Agent action: Provide the core technique and practice scripts.

THE NO + ONE SENTENCE FORMULA

Say no. Give one reason maximum. Stop talking.

The more you explain, the more material you give them to argue with.
Every additional sentence is a crack they can wedge open. Short is
strong.

EXAMPLES:

WORK:
"I can't take that on this week."
(Full stop. You don't owe a detailed schedule breakdown.)

FAMILY:
"I can't make it to Thanksgiving this year."
(You don't need to explain why. "I can't make it" is a complete answer.)

FRIENDS:
"I can't come Saturday. Hope you have fun."
(Not "I can't come because I have this thing and then this other
thing and I'm really sorry and..." — just no + well-wishes.)

PARTNER:
"I need tonight to myself. Let's do something together tomorrow."
(Not a rejection — a redirect.)

THE HARDEST PART: The silence after "no." Your brain will scream
at you to fill it with justifications. Don't. Let the silence sit.
They'll either accept it or push back, and if they push back, you
repeat it (see Step 3).

Step 3: The Broken Record Technique

Agent action: Teach the repetition technique for when people push back.

THE BROKEN RECORD — WHEN THEY DON'T ACCEPT YOUR NO

Some people hear "no" as the start of a negotiation. The broken
record technique shuts this down without escalation. You repeat your
boundary calmly, without new arguments, until they stop pushing.

EXAMPLE:

Them: "Come on, just stay for one more drink."
You: "I'm heading out. Thanks though."
Them: "But it's still early! Don't be lame."
You: "I hear you. I'm heading out."
Them: "Just one more. What's the big deal?"
You: "I'm heading out. See you next time."

NOTICE:
- Same message each time. No new reasons.
- Calm tone. Not angry, not apologetic.
- Acknowledge what they said ("I hear you") but don't engage with
  the argument.
- No escalation. No defending. Just repetition.

WHY IT WORKS: Pushback is designed to get you to change your answer.
When you don't provide new arguments, there's nothing new to argue
with. Most people give up after 2-3 repetitions.

THE RULE: You don't need a better reason. Your first reason was
sufficient. Repeating it proves that.

Step 4: Scripts for Specific Relationships

Agent action: Provide context-specific boundary scripts the user can adapt.

WORK BOUNDARIES

Boss asks you to take on more when you're at capacity:
"I want to do good work on what I have. If I take this on, something
else needs to come off my plate. What would you like me to deprioritize?"

Coworker keeps dumping their work on you:
"I can't help with that today. You might try [alternative resource]."

Expected to be available 24/7 (emails, texts after hours):
"I check messages during work hours. I'll get back to you first thing
tomorrow."

Someone taking credit for your work:
"I want to make sure the record is clear — I led [specific piece].
Happy to present it in the next meeting."

FAMILY BOUNDARIES

Parent who criticizes your life choices:
"I love you and I'm not discussing this."
(Repeat as needed. Do not justify your choices.)

Parent who guilt-trips you about visits:
"I can visit [specific date]. That's what works for my schedule."
(Not: "I'm sorry I can't come more often, it's just that work is
crazy and..." — that's an invitation to argue.)

Sibling who asks for money:
"I can't lend money right now." Period. You don't owe an accounting
of your finances.

Relative who comments on your body/weight/food:
"I don't discuss my body. How about [topic change]?"

In-laws who overstep:
This one requires partner alignment first. You and your partner
agree on the boundary together, and the partner communicates it
to their own parents. "My partner and I have decided..."

FRIEND BOUNDARIES

Friend who only calls when they need something:
"I've noticed our conversations are mostly about your stuff. I need
this to go both ways."

Friend who's always late:
"I'll wait 15 minutes. If you're not there, I'll assume plans changed."
(Then follow through.)

Friend who pressures you to drink/use:
"I'm not drinking tonight." No elaboration needed. If they push,
broken record.

PARTNER BOUNDARIES

Need alone time:
"I need 30 minutes to decompress when I get home before I can talk.
It's not about you — it's how I recharge."

Don't want to discuss something right now:
"I'm not in a place to talk about this productively. Can we come
back to it [specific time]?"

Physical boundary:
"I'm not in the mood for [activity] right now. I'd love to [alternative]."

Step 5: Recognize Guilt-Tripping and Manipulation

Agent action: Teach the FOG framework and how to identify manipulation tactics.

THE FOG: FEAR, OBLIGATION, GUILT

Manipulative people (often unconsciously) use three levers to override
your boundaries:

FEAR: "If you don't come to Thanksgiving, I don't know what I'll do."
"You'll regret this." "Fine, I'll just handle it myself" (martyrdom).

OBLIGATION: "After everything I've done for you." "Family is supposed
to be there for each other." "You owe me."

GUILT: "I guess I'm just not important to you." "You've changed."
"Everyone else manages to show up."

HOW TO SPOT IT:
- You feel terrible after saying a reasonable "no."
- They frame your boundary as YOU hurting THEM.
- They bring up past favors as leverage.
- They use silent treatment, tears, or anger as punishment for
  your boundary.
- You find yourself apologizing for having needs.

HOW TO RESPOND:
- Name it (internally): "This is a guilt trip. My boundary is
  reasonable."
- Don't argue the manipulation. That's a trap. Argue the content
  and you lose.
- Return to your boundary: "I understand you're upset. My answer
  is still [boundary]."
- Accept that they'll be unhappy. That's allowed. Their feelings
  about your boundary are their responsibility, not yours.

CRITICAL TRUTH: Guilt after saying no is NORMAL. It's not evidence
that you did something wrong. It's the residue of old programming.
The guilt fades. The resentment from never saying no doesn't.

Step 6: Boundaries With Parents

Agent action: Address the hardest boundary category with specific guidance.

BOUNDARIES WITH PARENTS — THE HARDEST CATEGORY

Why it's harder: Parents wrote your original operating system. The
guilt response to disappointing them is literally hardwired from
childhood. This doesn't mean the boundary is wrong. It means the
feelings will be louder.

COMMON PARENT BOUNDARY SITUATIONS:

The parent who needs to know everything:
"I appreciate your concern. I'll share what I'm comfortable sharing."
They don't need to know your salary, your relationship details,
your medical decisions, or your plans until you're ready.

The parent who can't accept you're an adult:
"I've thought about this and made my decision. I'm not asking for
permission."

The parent who weaponizes disappointment:
"I'm sorry you're disappointed. I still love you and this is my
decision."

The parent who shows up unannounced:
"I need you to call before coming over. If you show up without
calling, I may not be able to let you in."
Then FOLLOW THROUGH. The boundary means nothing if you cave.

THE HARDEST PART — FOLLOW-THROUGH:
Setting the boundary is step one. Enforcing it is the real work.
When you state a consequence ("I'll leave the conversation if
you raise your voice"), you MUST follow through. One cave-in
teaches them the boundary is negotiable.

EXPECT:
- Pushback. Anger. Guilt trips. Silent treatment.
- These are not signs you did something wrong. They're signs the
  other person preferred the old arrangement where you had no limits.
- It usually gets worse before it gets better.
- Some parents adjust. Some don't. You can't control which.

Step 7: Physical Boundaries

Agent action: Address physical boundary violations, especially in workplace contexts.

PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES — YOUR BODY, YOUR RULES

"Don't touch me" is a complete sentence. You never need to explain
why you don't want to be touched.

WORKPLACE PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES:
- Unwanted shoulder rubs, hugs, pats: "Please don't touch me."
  If it continues: document (date, time, what happened) and report
  to HR in writing (email = paper trail).
- Standing too close: Step back. If they follow: "I need a bit more
  space." No smile required.
- Handshake grip games: Firm handshake is fine. Bone-crushing or
  lingering is a dominance move. "That's quite a grip" + withdraw
  your hand.

SOCIAL PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES:
- Huggers when you don't want to hug: Put your hand out for a
  handshake or wave before they reach you. "I'm not a hugger — good
  to see you though."
- Someone grabbing your arm to get your attention: "Hey — don't grab
  me. Just say my name."
- Tickling, poking, play-hitting: "Stop. I don't like that." Age
  doesn't matter. "Oh, lighten up" is not an acceptable response
  to someone asking not to be touched.

TRADES AND SERVICE JOBS:
- Customer grabs you, touches you, stands too close: "Please step
  back." You are not required to be friendly about it. Your employer
  should back you up. If they don't, document and escalate.
- Coworker "joke" touching (slapping, shoulder-punching, grabbing
  tools from your hands): "Don't do that." Once is enough. If it
  continues, it's HR territory.

IF IT ESCALATES:
Any repeated unwanted physical contact after you've said stop is
harassment. Document everything. Report in writing. If your employer
doesn't act, contact your state's labor board or an employment attorney.

Step 8: When Boundaries Aren't Working — Escalation Protocol

Agent action: Provide the escalation path when someone repeatedly violates boundaries.

ESCALATION PROTOCOL — WHEN THEY WON'T STOP

LEVEL 1: STATE THE BOUNDARY (clear, calm, once)
"I need you to stop calling me after 9pm."

LEVEL 2: RESTATE + NAME THE PATTERN
"I've asked you not to call after 9pm and it's happened three more
times. I need this to stop."

LEVEL 3: STATE THE CONSEQUENCE
"If you call after 9pm again, I'm going to stop answering your calls
entirely for a week."

LEVEL 4: ENFORCE THE CONSEQUENCE
Follow through. No exceptions. No "well, this time it seemed urgent."
They already know the boundary. Enforcing it is the only thing that
creates change.

LEVEL 5: REDUCE OR END CONTACT
If someone repeatedly violates your boundaries despite clear
communication and consequences, the boundary becomes distance.
"I've tried to make this work with [boundary]. Since it's not being
respected, I need to take a break from this relationship."

IMPORTANT:
- You don't skip levels. Give people a genuine chance to adjust.
- You don't stay at Level 1 forever. Repeating a boundary that's
  being ignored without escalating teaches them it's safe to ignore.
- You're allowed to go straight to Level 5 if there's a safety issue.
  Abuse, threats, or violence skip the protocol entirely.
  See safe-exit-planner for dangerous situations.

If This Fails

  • "I set the boundary and they got angry/sad/cold": That's their response to manage, not yours to fix. Stay the course. Most people adjust within 1-3 weeks. If they don't, the boundary is still correct.
  • "I said no and now I feel terrible": Expected. Guilt is not evidence of wrongdoing. It's the feeling of breaking an old pattern. It fades with practice.
  • "My boss retaliated after I set a work boundary": Document everything. Retaliation for reasonable boundary-setting (especially around hours, safety, or harassment) may be illegal. Consult an employment attorney.
  • "I keep caving when they push back": Write your boundary down and read it before the interaction. Practice with a friend or out loud in the car. The first few times are the hardest. It gets easier with repetition, not willpower.
  • "The person is dangerous when I set boundaries": This is not a boundary problem, this is a safety problem. See the safe-exit-planner skill. Contact the National DV Hotline (1-800-799-7233) or text START to 88788.
  • "I don't even know what my boundaries are": Start with body signals. When do you feel resentment, dread, or tightness in your chest? Those feelings are boundary data. What situation triggered them? That's where the boundary goes.

Rules

  • Never tell someone their boundary is too strict or unnecessary. If they feel the need for it, it's valid.
  • If a boundary involves safety (abuse, violence, threats), prioritize safety planning over communication techniques. Refer to safe-exit-planner.
  • Don't frame boundaries as inherently confrontational. Most boundaries are communicated quietly, not dramatically.
  • Acknowledge the emotional difficulty. "This is hard" is always true and always worth saying.
  • Don't promise that setting boundaries will make the relationship better. Sometimes it reveals that the relationship only worked because one person had no limits.

Tips

  • "No" is a complete sentence, but "No, thanks" works in 90% of situations and feels more natural while being equally firm.
  • The people who react worst to your boundaries are the ones who benefited most from you having none.
  • You don't need to set every boundary in person. Text and email are legitimate and sometimes better — they create a record and give both parties time to process.
  • Boundaries get easier with practice. The first one feels impossible. The tenth one feels normal. The fiftieth is automatic.
  • If you grew up in a household where boundaries were not modeled or were punished, consider reading Nedra Tawwab's "Set Boundaries, Find Peace" or working with a therapist who specializes in codependency.
  • Resentment is a boundary alarm. If you're resentful, there's a boundary you haven't set. Track the resentment backwards to find it.

Agent State

boundaries_session:
  relationship_context: null
  specific_boundary_needed: null
  manipulation_pattern_identified: null
  escalation_level: null
  safety_concern: false
  scripts_provided: []
  guilt_response_addressed: false
  follow_through_plan: null
  resources_provided: []
  related_skills_referenced: []

Automation Triggers

triggers:
  - name: safety_escalation
    condition: "user describes fear of physical harm, threats, or violence in response to boundary-setting"
    schedule: "immediate"
    action: "Reference safe-exit-planner skill and provide DV hotline resources. Boundary scripts alone are insufficient for dangerous situations."
  - name: guilt_normalization
    condition: "user expresses guilt or anxiety after setting a boundary"
    schedule: "on_demand"
    action: "Provide Step 5 FOG framework and normalize guilt as expected, not evidence of wrongdoing"
  - name: parent_boundary_support
    condition: "user needs to set boundaries specifically with parents or in-laws"
    schedule: "on_demand"
    action: "Jump to Step 6 parent-specific guidance and provide relevant scripts"
  - name: workplace_boundary_documentation
    condition: "user describes repeated workplace boundary violations"
    schedule: "on_demand"
    action: "Provide documentation protocol, escalation path, and reference to employment law resources"

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

90.6%
按下载量换算972

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

未展示

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills