Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

performance-profiler性能分析器

Agent Skill

performance-profiler 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,360

周安装

55

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

427
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performance-profiler(性能分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/performance-profiler
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill performance-profiler
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill performance-profiler

简介

performance-profiler 系统化分析 Node.js、Python、Go 应用的性能瓶颈,识别 CPU、内存与数据库问题。

  • 支持火焰图生成、内存泄漏检测、Bundle 分析及 k6/Artillery 负载测试。
  • 强制执行“测量-定位-修复-验证”闭环,避免盲目优化。
  • 运行测试前需准备稳定环境,防止本地模拟干扰真实性能表现。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Performance Profiler

Tier: POWERFUL Category: Engineering / Performance Maintainer: Claude Skills Team

Overview

Systematic performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications. Identifies CPU bottlenecks with flamegraphs, detects memory leaks with heap snapshots, analyzes bundle sizes, optimizes database queries, detects N+1 patterns, and runs load tests with k6 and Artillery. Enforces a measure-first methodology: establish baseline, identify bottleneck, fix, and verify improvement.

Keywords

performance profiling, flamegraph, memory leak, bundle analysis, N+1 queries, load testing, k6, latency, P99, CPU profiling, heap snapshot, database optimization

Golden Rule: Measure First

WRONG: "I think the N+1 query is slow, let me fix it"
RIGHT: Profile → Confirm bottleneck → Fix → Measure again → Verify improvement

Every optimization must have:
1. Baseline metrics (before)
2. Profiler evidence (what's actually slow)
3. The fix
4. Post-fix metrics (after)
5. Delta calculation (improvement %)

Core Capabilities

1. CPU Profiling

  • Node.js: Clinic.js flamegraphs, V8 CPU profiles
  • Python: py-spy flamegraphs, cProfile, scalene
  • Go: pprof CPU profiles, trace visualization
  • Browser: Chrome DevTools Performance panel

2. Memory Profiling

  • Heap snapshots and comparison (before/after)
  • Garbage collection pressure analysis
  • Memory leak detection patterns
  • Retained object graph analysis

3. Database Optimization

  • EXPLAIN ANALYZE for query plan analysis
  • N+1 query detection and batching
  • Slow query log analysis
  • Missing index identification
  • Connection pool sizing

4. Bundle Analysis

  • webpack-bundle-analyzer visualization
  • Next.js bundle analyzer
  • Tree-shaking effectiveness
  • Dynamic import opportunities
  • Heavy dependency identification

5. Load Testing

  • k6 scripts with ramp-up patterns
  • SLA threshold enforcement in CI
  • Latency percentile tracking (P50, P95, P99)
  • Concurrent user simulation

When to Use

  • App is slow and you do not know where the bottleneck is
  • P99 latency exceeds SLA before a release
  • Memory usage grows over time (suspected leak)
  • Bundle size increased after adding dependencies
  • Preparing for a traffic spike (load test before launch)
  • Database queries taking >100ms
  • After a dependency upgrade to verify no regressions

Node.js CPU Profiling

Method 1: Clinic.js Flamegraph

# Install
npm install -g clinic

# Generate flamegraph (starts server, applies load, generates HTML report)
clinic flame -- node server.js

# With specific load profile
clinic flame --autocannon [ /api/endpoint -c 10 -d 30 ] -- node server.js

# Analyze specific scenario
clinic flame --on-port 'autocannon -c 50 -d 60 http://localhost:$PORT/api/heavy-endpoint' -- node server.js

Method 2: V8 CPU Profile

# Start Node with inspector
node --inspect server.js

# Or profile on demand
node --cpu-prof --cpu-prof-dir=./profiles server.js
# Load the .cpuprofile file in Chrome DevTools > Performance

# Programmatic profiling of a specific function
const { Session } = require('inspector');
const session = new Session();
session.connect();

session.post('Profiler.enable', () => {
  session.post('Profiler.start', () => {
    // Run the code you want to profile
    runHeavyOperation();

    session.post('Profiler.stop', (err, { profile }) => {
      require('fs').writeFileSync('profile.cpuprofile', JSON.stringify(profile));
    });
  });
});

Memory Leak Detection

Node.js Heap Snapshots

// Take heap snapshots programmatically
const v8 = require('v8');
const fs = require('fs');

function takeHeapSnapshot(label) {
  const snapshotPath = `heap-${label}-${Date.now()}.heapsnapshot`;
  const stream = v8.writeHeapSnapshot(snapshotPath);
  console.log(`Heap snapshot written to: ${snapshotPath}`);
  return snapshotPath;
}

// Leak detection pattern: compare two snapshots
// 1. Take snapshot at startup
takeHeapSnapshot('baseline');

// 2. Run operations that you suspect leak
// ... process 1000 requests ...

// 3. Force GC and take another snapshot
if (global.gc) global.gc(); // requires --expose-gc flag
takeHeapSnapshot('after-load');

// Load both .heapsnapshot files in Chrome DevTools > Memory
// Use "Comparison" view to find objects that grew

Python Memory Profiling

# Install tracemalloc-based profiler
pip install memray

# Profile a script
memray run my_script.py
memray flamegraph memray-output.bin -o flamegraph.html

# Profile a specific function
python -c "
import tracemalloc
tracemalloc.start()

# Run your code
from my_module import heavy_function
heavy_function()

snapshot = tracemalloc.take_snapshot()
top_stats = snapshot.statistics('lineno')
print('Top 10 memory allocations:')
for stat in top_stats[:10]:
    print(stat)
"

Database Query Optimization

EXPLAIN ANALYZE Workflow

-- Step 1: Get the actual execution plan (not just estimated)
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT TEXT)
SELECT t.*, p.name as project_name
FROM tasks t
JOIN projects p ON p.id = t.project_id
WHERE p.workspace_id = 'ws_abc123'
  AND t.status = 'in_progress'
  AND t.deleted_at IS NULL
ORDER BY t.updated_at DESC
LIMIT 20;

-- What to look for in the output:
-- Seq Scan on tasks  → MISSING INDEX (should be Index Scan)
-- Rows Removed by Filter: 99000  → INDEX NOT SELECTIVE ENOUGH
-- Sort Method: external merge  → NOT ENOUGH work_mem
-- Nested Loop with inner Seq Scan  → MISSING INDEX ON JOIN COLUMN
-- Actual rows=1000 vs estimated rows=1  → STALE STATISTICS (run ANALYZE)

N+1 Query Detection

// PROBLEM: N+1 query pattern
async function getProjectsWithTasks(workspaceId: string) {
  const projects = await db.query.projects.findMany({
    where: eq(projects.workspaceId, workspaceId),
  });

  // This executes N additional queries (one per project)
  for (const project of projects) {
    project.tasks = await db.query.tasks.findMany({
      where: eq(tasks.projectId, project.id),
    });
  }
  return projects;
}
// Total queries: 1 + N (where N = number of projects)

// FIX: Single query with JOIN or relation loading
async function getProjectsWithTasks(workspaceId: string) {
  return db.query.projects.findMany({
    where: eq(projects.workspaceId, workspaceId),
    with: {
      tasks: true,  // Drizzle generates a single JOIN or subquery
    },
  });
}
// Total queries: 1-2 (depending on ORM strategy)

N+1 Detection Script

# Log query count per request (add to middleware)
# Node.js with Drizzle:
let queryCount = 0;
const originalQuery = db.execute;
db.execute = (...args) => { queryCount++; return originalQuery.apply(db, args); };

// After request completes:
if (queryCount > 10) {
  console.warn(`N+1 ALERT: ${req.method} ${req.path} executed ${queryCount} queries`);
}

Bundle Analysis

Next.js Bundle Analyzer

# Install
pnpm add -D @next/bundle-analyzer

# next.config.js
const withBundleAnalyzer = require('@next/bundle-analyzer')({
  enabled: process.env.ANALYZE === 'true',
});
module.exports = withBundleAnalyzer(nextConfig);

# Run analysis
ANALYZE=true pnpm build
# Opens browser with interactive treemap

Quick Bundle Size Check

# Check what you're shipping
npx source-map-explorer .next/static/chunks/*.js

# Size of individual imports
npx import-cost  # VS Code extension for inline size

# Find heavy dependencies
npx depcheck --json | jq '.dependencies'
npx bundlephobia-cli <package-name>

Common Bundle Wins

BeforeAfterSavings
import _ from 'lodash'import groupBy from 'lodash/groupBy'~70KB
import moment from 'moment'import {format} from 'date-fns'~60KB
import {icons} from 'lucide-react'import {Search} from 'lucide-react'~50KB
Static import of heavy componentdynamic(() => import('./HeavyChart'))Deferred
All routes in one chunkCode splitting per route (automatic in Next.js)Per-route

Load Testing with k6

// load-test.k6.js
import http from 'k6/http'
import { check, sleep } from 'k6'
import { Trend, Rate } from 'k6/metrics'

const apiLatency = new Trend('api_latency')
const errorRate = new Rate('errors')

export const options = {
  stages: [
    { duration: '1m', target: 20 },    // ramp up
    { duration: '3m', target: 100 },   // sustain
    { duration: '1m', target: 0 },     // ramp down
  ],
  thresholds: {
    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200', 'p(99)<500'],
    errors: ['rate<0.01'],
    api_latency: ['p(95)<150'],
  },
}

export default function () {
  const res = http.get(`${__ENV.BASE_URL}/api/v1/projects?limit=20`, {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${__ENV.TOKEN}` },
  })

  apiLatency.add(res.timings.duration)
  check(res, {
    'status 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
    'body has data': (r) => JSON.parse(r.body).data !== undefined,
  }) || errorRate.add(1)

  sleep(1)
}
# Run locally
k6 run load-test.k6.js -e BASE_URL=http://localhost:3000 -e TOKEN=$TOKEN

# Run with cloud reporting
k6 cloud load-test.k6.js

Before/After Measurement Template

## Performance Optimization: [What You Fixed]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Ticket:** PROJ-123

### Problem
[1-2 sentences: what was slow, how it was observed]

### Root Cause
[What the profiler revealed — include flamegraph link or screenshot]

### Baseline (Before)
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| P50 latency | XXms |
| P95 latency | XXms |
| P99 latency | XXms |
| Throughput (RPS) | XX |
| DB queries/request | XX |
| Bundle size | XXkB |

### Fix Applied
[Brief description + link to PR]

### After
| Metric | Before | After | Delta |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|
| P50 | XXms | XXms | -XX% |
| P95 | XXms | XXms | -XX% |
| P99 | XXms | XXms | -XX% |
| RPS | XX | XX | +XX% |
| DB queries/req | XX | XX | -XX% |

### Verification
[Link to k6 output, CI run, or monitoring dashboard]

Quick-Win Optimization Checklist

DATABASE
[ ] Missing indexes on WHERE/ORDER BY columns
[ ] N+1 queries (check query count per request)
[ ] SELECT * when only 2-3 columns needed
[ ] No LIMIT on unbounded queries
[ ] Missing connection pool (new connection per request)
[ ] Stale statistics (run ANALYZE on busy tables)

NODE.JS
[ ] Sync I/O (fs.readFileSync) in request handlers
[ ] JSON.parse/stringify of large objects in hot loops
[ ] Missing response compression (gzip/brotli)
[ ] Dependencies loaded inside request handlers (move to module level)
[ ] Sequential awaits that could be Promise.all

BUNDLE
[ ] Full lodash/moment import instead of specific functions
[ ] Static imports of heavy components (use dynamic import)
[ ] Images not optimized / not using next/image
[ ] No code splitting on routes

API
[ ] No pagination on list endpoints
[ ] No Cache-Control headers on stable responses
[ ] Serial fetches that could run in parallel
[ ] Fetching related data in loops instead of JOINs

Common Pitfalls

  • Optimizing without measuring — you will optimize the wrong thing
  • Testing with development data — 10 rows in dev vs millions in prod reveals different bottlenecks
  • Ignoring P99 — P50 can look fine while P99 is catastrophic for some users
  • Premature optimization — fix correctness first, then measure and optimize
  • Not re-measuring after the fix — always verify the fix actually improved the metrics
  • Load testing production — use staging with production-sized data volumes instead

Best Practices

  1. Baseline first, always — record P50/P95/P99, RPS, and error rate before touching anything
  2. One change at a time — isolate the variable to confirm causation, not correlation
  3. Profile with realistic data volumes — performance characteristics change dramatically with scale
  4. Set performance budgetsp(95) < 200ms as a CI gate with k6
  5. Monitor continuously — add Datadog/Prometheus/Grafana metrics for key code paths
  6. Cache aggressively, invalidate precisely — cache is the fastest optimization but hardest to debug
  7. Document the win — before/after in the PR description motivates the team and creates institutional knowledge

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Flamegraph shows only (idle) framesProfiling during low-load period; no meaningful CPU work capturedApply realistic load with autocannon or k6 during profiling, target the specific endpoint under investigation
Heap snapshot comparison shows no growth but memory still climbsNative memory leak outside V8 heap (e.g., native addon, file descriptor leak)Use process.memoryUsage().rss tracking alongside heap snapshots; profile with Valgrind or memray for native allocations
EXPLAIN ANALYZE shows Index Scan but query is still slowIndex exists but is not selective enough, or query returns too many rows for index to helpCheck index selectivity with SELECT count(DISTINCT col)/count(*) FROM table; consider composite index or partial index
k6 load test passes locally but fails in CICI runner has limited CPU/memory; network latency differs from localRun k6 against a dedicated staging environment, not localhost in CI; adjust thresholds for CI-specific baselines
Bundle analyzer shows expected size but app still loads slowlyLarge bundle is code-split but critical path has render-blocking resourcesAudit the critical rendering path separately with Lighthouse; check for synchronous scripts and unoptimized images
py-spy cannot attach to running processInsufficient permissions or SIP (System Integrity Protection) on macOSRun with sudo py-spy record --pid <PID>; on macOS, disable SIP or use --subprocesses flag with a fresh process
N+1 detection middleware reports false positivesLegitimate batch operations trigger high query counts per requestAdd endpoint-level allowlists to the detection middleware; distinguish between N+1 patterns and intentional batch queries by checking for repeated identical query templates

Success Criteria

  • Baseline coverage: Every optimization PR includes documented before/after metrics with P50, P95, and P99 latency values
  • Latency targets met: P95 API response time stays below 200ms and P99 below 500ms as validated by k6 threshold checks in CI
  • Memory stability: No heap growth exceeding 10% over a 24-hour soak test under sustained load
  • Bundle budget enforced: JavaScript bundle size for initial page load remains under 200kB gzipped, verified by CI gate
  • N+1 elimination: Query count per API request stays below 10 for all critical endpoints, validated by request-level query logging
  • Load test confidence: Staging load tests demonstrate the system handles 2x expected peak traffic with error rate below 1%
  • Regression detection: Performance regressions are caught within one CI cycle, not discovered in production monitoring

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • CPU and memory profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications using flamegraphs and heap snapshots
  • Database query optimization including EXPLAIN ANALYZE interpretation, N+1 detection, and index recommendations
  • Frontend bundle analysis and size reduction strategies for webpack and Next.js projects
  • Load testing methodology with k6 including ramp-up patterns, threshold enforcement, and CI integration

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Application Performance Monitoring (APM) platform setup and configuration (Datadog, New Relic, Grafana) — see engineering/observability-designer
  • Infrastructure-level performance tuning (kernel parameters, network stack, container resource limits) — see engineering/senior-devops
  • Security-focused performance concerns such as DDoS mitigation or rate limiting — see engineering/senior-security
  • Mobile application profiling (iOS Instruments, Android Profiler) — see engineering/senior-mobile

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
engineering/observability-designerPerformance profiling findings feed into observability dashboard design; alerting thresholds derived from profiling baselinesProfiler baselines and SLA thresholds → Prometheus/Grafana alert rules and dashboard panels
engineering/ci-cd-pipeline-builderk6 load tests and bundle size checks integrate as CI pipeline gatesk6 threshold configs and bundle budget scripts → CI pipeline stage definitions
engineering/database-designerQuery optimization recommendations inform schema design decisions; index suggestions feed back to schema migrationsEXPLAIN ANALYZE findings and index recommendations → schema migration files and index definitions
engineering/senior-backendBackend architecture decisions incorporate profiling data; connection pool sizing and caching strategies validated by load testsProfiling reports and load test results → architecture decision records and implementation guidance
engineering/tech-debt-trackerPerformance regressions and unresolved bottlenecks are tracked as technical debt items with measured impactBefore/after measurement reports and unresolved findings → tech debt backlog with quantified cost
engineering/senior-frontendBundle analysis results drive frontend optimization work; code-splitting and lazy-loading decisions backed by profiler dataBundle analyzer output and Lighthouse scores → frontend optimization tasks and component refactoring plans

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.18%
按下载量换算146

Claude

29.45%
按下载量换算126

Cursor

21.58%
按下载量换算92

Gemini CLI

10.15%
按下载量换算43

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills