Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

nda-triageNDA 分类

Agent Skill

nda-triage 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

419

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

147
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:nda-triage(NDA 分类)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/nda-triage
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill nda-triage
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill nda-triage

简介

nda-triage 对保密协议进行快速分类筛查,标记为绿色(标准通过)、黄色(法务复核)或红色(重大风险)。

  • 基于十项检查清单评估协议结构、定义条款、义务范围和争议性条款。
  • 适用于法律团队初筛 NDA,但不构成正式法律意见,需结合专业律师判断。
  • 实验性质较强,建议仅作参考用途,重要决策应咨询合格法律顾问。
  • nda-triage 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL — This skill is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All responsibility for usage rests with the user. Consult qualified legal professionals before acting on any output.

NDA Triage

Rapid NDA screening tool that classifies incoming NDAs as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (significant issues). Uses a 10-point screening checklist to evaluate agreement structure, definitions, obligations, carveouts, and problematic provisions.


Table of Contents

- NDA Screener - NDA Checklist

- Standard NDA Triage - Bulk NDA Processing


Tools

NDA Screener

Scans NDA text for red flags and outputs GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with reasoning.

# Screen an NDA file
python scripts/nda_screener.py nda_draft.txt

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/nda_screener.py incoming_nda.md --json

# Save screening results
python scripts/nda_screener.py nda_draft.txt --output screening.json --json

What it detects:

  • Missing standard carveouts (public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion)
  • Non-solicitation and non-compete clauses
  • Perpetual confidentiality obligations
  • Overbroad definition of confidential information
  • Residuals clauses granting usage rights to ideas/concepts
  • IP assignment or license grants
  • Liquidated damages provisions
  • Unlimited audit rights
  • One-sided obligations

Classification Rules:

LevelCriteriaRouting
GREENAll 5 carveouts present, no problematic provisions, standard structureBusiness approver; no counsel needed
YELLOW1-2 missing carveouts, minor problematic provisions, or non-standard termsLegal counsel review within 48 hours
RED3+ missing carveouts, non-compete/non-solicitation, IP assignment, perpetual term with no exitSenior counsel review; do not sign

NDA Checklist

Generates a compliance checklist for an NDA, checking all 10 screening criteria with pass/fail status.

# Generate checklist for an NDA
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt

# JSON output
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt --json

# Save checklist
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt --output checklist.json --json

10-Point Screening Criteria:

#CriterionWhat It Checks
1Agreement StructureMutual vs. one-way; parties identified; purpose stated
2Definition of Confidential InfoScope, specificity, marking requirements
3ObligationsStandard of care, use restrictions, disclosure limits
4Standard Carveouts5 required: public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion
5Permitted DisclosuresRepresentatives, advisors, affiliates with need-to-know
6Term & DurationReasonable term, survival period, obligations after expiry
7Return/DestructionObligation to return or destroy upon request/termination
8RemediesInjunctive relief, damages, indemnification scope
9Problematic ProvisionsNon-solicitation, non-compete, exclusivity, residuals, IP assignment, audit rights
10Governing LawJurisdiction, dispute resolution mechanism

Reference Guides

NDA Screening Criteria

references/nda_screening_criteria.md

Complete evaluation reference covering:

  • All 10 screening criteria with detailed sub-items
  • GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification rules with specific examples
  • Common NDA issues with standard positions
  • Redline approaches for common problems

Workflows

Standard NDA Triage

  1. Receive NDA -- Save as .txt or .md file
  2. Screen -- Run nda_screener.py for quick RED/YELLOW/GREEN classification
  3. Checklist -- Run nda_checklist.py for detailed 10-point evaluation
  4. Route -- Follow routing recommendations based on classification
  5. Track -- Log screening result and routing decision

Bulk NDA Processing

# Screen multiple NDAs
for nda in ndas/*.txt; do
  echo "=== $nda ==="
  python scripts/nda_screener.py "$nda"
  echo ""
done

# Generate JSON report for all NDAs
for nda in ndas/*.txt; do
  python scripts/nda_screener.py "$nda" --json --output "results/$(basename $nda .txt).json"
done

Routing Recommendations

ClassificationApproverTimelineEscalation
GREENBusiness owner or designated approverSame day; sign within 24 hoursNone required
YELLOWLegal counsel review48-hour turnaroundEscalate to senior counsel if no response in 72 hours
REDSenior legal counsel5 business day turnaroundEscalate to General Counsel if deal-critical

GREEN Fast-Track Conditions

All of the following must be true for GREEN classification:

  • Mutual NDA (both parties bound)
  • All 5 standard carveouts present
  • No non-solicitation, non-compete, or exclusivity clauses
  • No IP assignment or license grants
  • No residuals clause
  • Term is 2-5 years (not perpetual)
  • Return/destruction obligation present
  • Standard remedies (injunctive relief, no liquidated damages)

RED Escalation Triggers

Any one of the following triggers RED classification:

  • Non-compete clause of any scope
  • Non-solicitation clause covering employees or customers
  • IP assignment or broad license grant
  • Missing 3 or more standard carveouts
  • Perpetual obligations with no termination right
  • Liquidated damages for breach
  • Exclusivity provision

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Screener classifies everything as YELLOWNDA uses non-standard formatting that breaks pattern matchingEnsure NDA is clean plain text; remove PDF artifacts and headers/footers
Missing carveouts false positiveCarveouts are present but use unusual languageReview the full "Exceptions" or "Exclusions" section manually; the screener checks common phrasings
Non-compete not detectedNon-compete is embedded in definitions or obligations section rather than standaloneSearch the full document for "compete", "competitive", "restrict" manually
Checklist shows PASS but screener shows REDChecklist evaluates presence; screener evaluates content qualityUse both tools together; the screener's RED overrides checklist PASS
Script errors on large filesNDA text exceeds expected size (>100KB)Ensure the file contains only the NDA text, not appendices or exhibits

Success Criteria

  • NDA triage under 5 minutes: Automated screening replaces 30-minute manual review.
  • Zero missed RED-severity issues: Every non-compete, IP assignment, and missing carveout is flagged.
  • GREEN NDAs signed within 24 hours: Fast-track routing eliminates bottleneck for standard agreements.
  • YELLOW NDAs resolved within 48 hours: Counsel review turnaround meets SLA.
  • Consistent classification across reviewers: 10-point checklist eliminates subjective "looks fine" approvals.
  • 100% of NDAs screened before routing: No NDA reaches an approver without automated triage.

Scope & Limitations

Covers:

  • Pattern-based screening of NDA text for structural issues and problematic provisions
  • 10-point compliance checklist against standard NDA requirements
  • GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with routing recommendations
  • Detection of non-solicitation, non-compete, IP assignment, residuals, and other problematic clauses
  • Missing carveout identification

Does NOT cover:

  • Legal advice -- classification is a screening aid, not a legal opinion
  • Negotiation or redlining -- use nda-review for deep clause analysis and redline generation
  • Multi-party NDAs -- optimized for bilateral (two-party) agreements
  • Industry-specific NDA requirements (healthcare, defense, government) -- patterns target commercial NDAs
  • Non-English NDAs -- pattern matching is English-language only

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsBetter Approach
Signing GREEN-classified NDAs without any human reviewAutomated screening cannot catch business-context risks (e.g., NDA with a direct competitor)GREEN classification means low legal risk, not zero risk; business approver must still review
Using triage as a substitute for deep NDA review on complex dealsTriage checks structure and red flags, not clause quality or negotiation positionRun nda-review skill for M&A, joint venture, or high-value partnership NDAs
Ignoring YELLOW classifications because "it's just an NDA"YELLOW items like missing carveouts or residuals clauses create real legal exposureRoute all YELLOW NDAs to counsel; missing independent development carveout alone can cost millions
Treating all NDAs as equal regardless of counterparty relationshipNDA with a startup partner requires different scrutiny than NDA with a Fortune 500 vendorAdjust review depth based on counterparty, deal value, and information sensitivity

Tool Reference

nda_screener.py

Purpose: Scans NDA text for red flags and problematic provisions. Outputs GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with detailed reasoning.

Usage:

python scripts/nda_screener.py <nda_file> [--json] [--output FILE]

Flags:

FlagShortDefaultDescription
nda_file*(positional)*Path to NDA text file (.txt or.md)
--jsonoffOutput in JSON format
--output-o*(stdout)*Write output to file

Example Output (JSON):

{
  "file": "vendor_nda.txt",
  "classification": "YELLOW",
  "red_flags": [
    {
      "id": "missing_carveout_independent_development",
      "severity": "YELLOW",
      "description": "Missing independent development carveout",
      "recommendation": "Add standard independent development exception"
    }
  ],
  "carveouts": {
    "public_knowledge": true,
    "prior_possession": true,
    "independent_development": false,
    "third_party_receipt": true,
    "legal_compulsion": true
  },
  "summary": "1 missing carveout; no critical issues. Route to counsel for review."
}

nda_checklist.py

Purpose: Generates a 10-point compliance checklist for an NDA, evaluating each screening criterion as PASS/FAIL with notes.

Usage:

python scripts/nda_checklist.py <nda_file> [--json] [--output FILE]

Flags:

FlagShortDefaultDescription
nda_file*(positional)*Path to NDA text file (.txt or.md)
--jsonoffOutput in JSON format
--output-o*(stdout)*Write output to file

Example Output:

NDA COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
========================
File: vendor_nda.txt
Overall: YELLOW (8/10 PASS)

 #  Criterion                    Status  Notes
 1  Agreement Structure          PASS    Mutual NDA; both parties identified
 2  Definition of Confidential   PASS    Reasonably scoped with marking requirement
 3  Obligations                  PASS    Standard of care; use restrictions present
 4  Standard Carveouts           FAIL    Missing: independent development
 5  Permitted Disclosures        PASS    Representatives and advisors covered
 6  Term & Duration              PASS    3-year term with 2-year survival
 7  Return/Destruction           PASS    Return or destroy within 30 days
 8  Remedies                     PASS    Injunctive relief; no liquidated damages
 9  Problematic Provisions       FAIL    Residuals clause detected
10  Governing Law                PASS    Delaware law; state courts

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.73%
按下载量换算50

Claude

29.65%
按下载量换算44

Cursor

20.88%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

9.18%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills