Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

isms-audit-expertISMS 审计专家

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

2,232

周安装

93

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

744
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:isms-audit-expert(ISMS 审计专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/isms-audit-expert
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill isms-audit-expert
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill isms-audit-expert

简介

isms-audit-expert 管理内外部 ISMS 审计,支持 ISO 27001 符合性验证与控制评估。

  • 适用于合规团队准备认证与风险控制,可在指定宿主环境中调用。
  • 通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 安装,具体流程与检查点见仓库文档。
  • 安装前请确认权限范围与维护状态,注意是否涉及敏感数据扫描或外部审计接口。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

ISMS Audit Expert

Internal and external ISMS audit management for ISO 27001 compliance verification, security control assessment, and certification support.


Audit Program Management

Risk-Based Audit Schedule

Risk LevelAudit FrequencyExamples
CriticalQuarterlyPrivileged access, vulnerability management, logging
HighSemi-annualAccess control, incident response, encryption
MediumAnnualPolicies, awareness training, physical security
LowAnnualDocumentation, asset inventory

Workflow: Annual Audit Planning

  1. Review prior audit results -- analyze previous findings, open items, and risk assessment outputs from the most recent cycle.
  2. Identify high-risk controls -- flag controls involved in recent security incidents or with outstanding nonconformities.
  3. Determine audit scope -- define ISMS boundaries, confirm Statement of Applicability (SoA) coverage for the certification cycle.
  4. Assign auditors -- ensure independence from audited areas; verify auditor competency (ISO 27001 Lead Auditor certification preferred).
  5. Create audit schedule -- allocate resources, assign dates, and distribute across the year by risk priority.
  6. Obtain management approval for the finalized audit plan.
  7. Validation checkpoint: Audit plan covers all 93 Annex A controls within the certification cycle; schedule approved by management; auditor independence confirmed.

Example: Annual Audit Plan Output

ISMS AUDIT PLAN 2026

Prepared by: Information Security Manager
Approved by: CISO
Date: 2026-01-15

Q1 2026 (January-March)
  Scope: Privileged access (A.8.2, A.8.18), Logging (A.8.15, A.8.16)
  Auditor: External consultant (independence required)
  Risk level: Critical

Q2 2026 (April-June)
  Scope: Access control (A.8.3-A.8.5), Incident response (A.5.24-A.5.28)
  Auditor: Internal audit team
  Risk level: High

Q3 2026 (July-September)
  Scope: Physical security (A.7.1-A.7.14), HR security (A.6.1-A.6.8)
  Auditor: Internal audit team
  Risk level: Medium

Q4 2026 (October-December)
  Scope: Policies (A.5.1-A.5.8), Asset management (A.5.9-A.5.14)
  Auditor: Internal audit team
  Risk level: Medium-Low

Coverage: 93/93 Annex A controls scheduled across 4 quarters

Audit Execution

Workflow: Pre-Audit Preparation

  1. Review ISMS documentation -- policies, Statement of Applicability, risk assessment, and risk treatment plan.
  2. Analyze previous audit reports -- note open findings and areas requiring follow-up.
  3. Prepare audit plan -- define interview schedule, control sample, and evidence requirements.
  4. Notify auditees -- communicate scope, timing, and documentation needed at least 2 weeks in advance.
  5. Prepare control-specific checklists for all controls in scope.
  6. Validation checkpoint: All documentation received and reviewed before the opening meeting.

Workflow: Audit Conduct

  1. Opening Meeting -- confirm scope, introduce audit team, agree on communication channels and logistics.
  2. Evidence Collection -- interview control owners, review documentation and records, observe processes in operation, inspect technical configurations.
  3. Control Verification -- test control design (does it address the risk?), test control operation (is it working as intended?), sample transactions and records, document all evidence.
  4. Closing Meeting -- present preliminary findings, clarify factual inaccuracies, agree on finding classification, confirm corrective action timelines.
  5. Validation checkpoint: All controls in scope assessed with documented evidence; findings classified and communicated.

Evidence Collection Methods

MethodUse CaseExample
InquiryProcess understandingInterview Security Manager about incident response
ObservationOperational verificationWatch visitor sign-in process at reception
InspectionDocumentation reviewCheck access approval records for last quarter
Re-performanceControl testingAttempt login with weak password to verify policy enforcement

Control Assessment

ISO 27002 Control Categories

Organizational Controls (A.5): Information security policies, roles and responsibilities, segregation of duties, contact with authorities, threat intelligence, information security in projects.

People Controls (A.6): Screening and background checks, employment terms, security awareness and training, disciplinary process, remote working security.

Physical Controls (A.7): Physical security perimeters, entry controls, securing offices and facilities, physical security monitoring, equipment protection.

Technological Controls (A.8): User endpoint devices, privileged access rights, access restriction, secure authentication, malware protection, vulnerability management, backup and recovery, logging and monitoring, network security, cryptography.

Workflow: Control Testing

  1. Identify control objective from the relevant ISO 27002 clause.
  2. Determine testing method -- inquiry, observation, inspection, or re-performance based on control type.
  3. Define sample size -- base on population size and risk level (e.g., 25 samples for quarterly access reviews, 5 for annual policy reviews).
  4. Execute test and document results with specific evidence references.
  5. Evaluate control effectiveness -- effective, partially effective, or ineffective.
  6. Validation checkpoint: Evidence supports conclusion; finding documented if control is not fully effective.

Example: Control Test Working Paper

CONTROL TEST WORKING PAPER

Control: A.8.2 - Privileged access rights
Objective: Privileged access is restricted and managed
Test date: 2026-03-10
Auditor: J. Smith

Test procedure:
  1. Obtained list of privileged accounts from IAM system (42 accounts)
  2. Selected sample of 10 accounts (25% sample rate)
  3. For each account, verified:
     - Documented business justification exists
     - Manager approval on file
     - Quarterly access review completed
     - No dormant accounts (last login within 90 days)

Results:
  - 8/10 accounts: All criteria met (PASS)
  - 1/10: Missing quarterly review for Q4 2025 (MINOR NC)
  - 1/10: No documented business justification (MINOR NC)

Conclusion: Control partially effective - minor nonconformity raised
Finding reference: ISMS-2026-007

Finding Management

Finding Classification

SeverityDefinitionResponse Time
Major NonconformityControl failure creating significant risk30 days
Minor NonconformityIsolated deviation with limited impact90 days
ObservationImprovement opportunityNext audit cycle

Finding Documentation Template

Finding ID: ISMS-2026-007
Control Reference: A.8.2 - Privileged access rights
Severity: Minor Nonconformity

Evidence:
- 1 of 10 sampled privileged accounts missing Q4 2025 review
- 1 of 10 sampled accounts lacks documented business justification
- Screenshots of IAM records and review log exported 2026-03-10

Risk Impact:
- Unreviewed privileged access increases insider threat exposure
- Non-justified accounts may represent unnecessary attack surface

Root Cause:
- Access review process relies on manual tracking; no automated reminder

Recommendation:
- Implement automated quarterly review reminders via IAM platform
- Require business justification field as mandatory in provisioning workflow
- Backfill missing reviews within 14 days

Workflow: Corrective Action

  1. Auditee acknowledges finding and severity classification.
  2. Root cause analysis completed within 10 business days.
  3. Corrective action plan submitted with target dates and responsible owners.
  4. Actions implemented by responsible parties per the plan.
  5. Auditor verifies effectiveness -- re-tests control with fresh evidence.
  6. Finding closed with documented evidence of resolution.
  7. Validation checkpoint: Root cause addressed; recurrence prevented; evidence of effective correction on file.

Certification Support

Stage 1 Audit Preparation Checklist

  • ISMS scope statement finalized
  • Information security policy (management signed)
  • Statement of Applicability (SoA) complete
  • Risk assessment methodology and results documented
  • Risk treatment plan current
  • Internal audit results available (past 12 months)
  • Management review minutes on file

Stage 2 Audit Preparation Checklist

  • All Stage 1 findings addressed and closed
  • ISMS operational for minimum 3 months
  • Evidence of control implementation across all SoA controls
  • Security awareness training records for all personnel
  • Incident response evidence (if incidents occurred)
  • Access review documentation for the audit period

Surveillance Audit Cycle

PeriodFocus
Year 1, Q2High-risk controls, Stage 2 findings follow-up
Year 1, Q4Continual improvement, control sample
Year 2, Q2Full surveillance
Year 2, Q4Re-certification preparation

Tools

ScriptPurposeUsage
isms_audit_scheduler.pyGenerate risk-based audit planspython scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --year 2026 --format markdown
# Generate annual audit plan
python scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --year 2026 --output audit_plan.json

# With custom control risk ratings
python scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --controls controls.csv --format markdown

# Generate plan for specific quarters only
python scripts/isms_audit_scheduler.py --year 2026 --quarters Q1 Q2 --format json

References

FileContent
iso27001-audit-methodology.mdAudit program structure, pre-audit phase, certification support
security-control-testing.mdTechnical verification procedures for ISO 27002 controls
cloud-security-audit.mdCloud provider assessment, configuration security, IAM review

Audit Performance Metrics

KPITargetMeasurement
Audit plan completion100%Audits completed vs. planned
Finding closure rate>90% within SLAClosed on time vs. total
Major nonconformities0 at certificationCount per certification cycle
Audit effectivenessIncidents preventedSecurity improvements implemented

Compliance Framework Integration

FrameworkISMS Audit Relevance
GDPRA.5.34 Privacy, A.8.10 Information deletion
HIPAAAccess controls, audit logging, encryption
PCI DSSNetwork security, access control, monitoring
SOC 2Trust Services Criteria mapped to ISO 27002

Troubleshooting

ProblemPossible CauseResolution
Audit plan does not cover all 93 Annex A controls within the certification cycleControls not inventoried against the 2022 four-theme structure or risk-based scheduling gapsUse isms_audit_scheduler.py with a complete controls CSV covering all 93 controls; ensure the 3-year cycle allocates quarterly audits for critical controls and annual coverage for all others
Major nonconformity found during certification auditSystemic control failure or complete absence of a required ISMS elementConduct immediate root cause analysis; develop corrective action plan with 30-day target; re-test the control with fresh evidence; schedule verification audit with certification body
Auditor independence challenged by certification bodyInternal auditors assigned to areas they manage or operateEstablish clear auditor independence policy; never assign auditors to areas they are responsible for; consider external consultants for high-risk control areas; document independence verification for each audit
Evidence collection incomplete for technological controls (A.8)Technical configurations not captured, logs not retained, or screenshots not timestampedPrepare control-specific evidence checklists before audit; request system administrators to export configurations; ensure log retention covers the audit period; timestamp all evidence artifacts
Finding closure rate below 90% targetCorrective actions not prioritized, unclear ownership, or insufficient follow-upAssign specific owners with due dates for every finding; implement automated tracking with escalation at 50% and 75% of SLA; conduct monthly corrective action reviews
Surveillance audit identifies regression in previously passed controlsControls degraded after initial certification due to staff changes, system updates, or process driftImplement continuous compliance monitoring (not just annual checks); schedule monthly control spot-checks for high-risk areas; include control effectiveness in management review
Sample-based testing misses systemic issuesSample size too small or selection biased toward known-good recordsCalculate sample size based on population and risk level (minimum 25 for quarterly reviews); use random selection methods; increase sample for areas with prior findings

Success Criteria

  • Audit plan completion rate of 100% -- all scheduled audits executed within the planned quarter, with no deferrals or cancellations without management approval
  • Zero major nonconformities at certification/surveillance audits -- all systemic control failures identified and corrected during internal audits before external assessment
  • Finding closure rate above 90% within SLA -- major nonconformities closed within 30 days, minor within 90 days, observations addressed by next audit cycle
  • All 93 Annex A controls audited within the 3-year certification cycle -- with critical controls (A.8.2, A.8.5, A.8.8, A.8.15) audited quarterly and high-risk controls semi-annually
  • Audit evidence documented with specific references -- every finding includes control reference, evidence type (inquiry/observation/inspection/re-performance), sample details, and conclusion
  • Auditor competency verified -- all assigned auditors have ISO 27001 Lead Auditor certification or equivalent, with independence confirmed for each audit engagement

Scope & Limitations

In Scope:

  • Risk-based annual audit planning and scheduling across all 93 ISO 27001:2022 Annex A controls
  • Audit execution workflows including pre-audit preparation, evidence collection, control testing, and closing meetings
  • Finding management with severity classification (Major NC, Minor NC, Observation) and corrective action tracking
  • Certification support for Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (implementation effectiveness) audits
  • Surveillance audit preparation and recertification planning
  • Control-specific testing procedures for organizational, people, physical, and technological control themes
  • Audit performance metrics and KPI tracking

Out of Scope:

  • Actual certification body selection, engagement, or fee negotiation
  • Technical penetration testing or vulnerability scanning -- use infrastructure-compliance-auditor for technical checks
  • ISO 27001 ISMS implementation -- use information-security-manager-iso27001 for implementation guidance
  • SOC 2 or other framework-specific audit execution beyond ISO 27001 cross-reference
  • Legal or contractual advice on audit findings or regulatory reporting obligations

Important Notes:

  • ISO 27001:2013 certifications expired after October 2025; all audits must now conform to the 2022 edition with 93 controls across 4 themes
  • 81% of organizations are pursuing ISO 27001 certification as of 2025 (up from 67% in 2024), reflecting heightened market demand for certified security programs
  • Best practice is to embed ISMS audit findings into continuous improvement rather than treating audits as periodic compliance events

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationWhen to Use
information-security-manager-iso27001ISMS implementation provides the controls and documentation that audits assessWhen audit findings require control improvements or ISMS enhancements
infrastructure-compliance-auditorTechnical infrastructure checks provide audit evidence for Annex A technological controlsWhen audit requires evidence of A.8 technological control implementation
soc2-compliance-expertSOC 2 audit evidence and Trust Services Criteria overlap with ISO 27001 controlsWhen organization maintains both ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance programs
capa-officerAudit findings requiring formal corrective action feed into CAPA processWhen major nonconformities require structured root cause analysis and corrective action

Tool Reference

isms_audit_scheduler.py

Generates risk-based annual audit plans with quarterly scheduling based on control risk ratings.

FlagRequiredDescription
--year <year>NoTarget year for audit plan (default: current year)
--controls <file>NoCSV file with custom control risk ratings (columns: control_id, name, risk); defaults to built-in risk ratings for 18 key controls
--quarters <list>NoGenerate plan for specific quarters only (e.g., --quarters Q1 Q2)
--format <fmt>NoOutput format: json (default) or markdown
--output <file>NoExport audit plan to specified file path

Audit Frequency by Risk Level:

  • critical: Quarterly (4x per year) -- e.g., A.8.2 Privileged access, A.8.5 Authentication, A.8.8 Vulnerabilities, A.8.15 Logging
  • high: Semi-annual (2x per year) -- e.g., A.5.15 Access control, A.5.24 Incident management, A.8.7 Malware protection
  • medium: Annual (1x per year) -- e.g., A.5.1 Policies, A.6.3 Awareness training, A.7.1 Physical perimeters
  • low: Annual (1x per year) -- e.g., Documentation, asset inventory

Output: Quarterly audit schedule with control assignments, auditor allocation guidance, risk-based prioritization, and coverage tracking ensuring all controls are scheduled within the certification cycle.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.56%
按下载量换算242

Claude

30.83%
按下载量换算229

Cursor

18.61%
按下载量换算138

Gemini CLI

8.94%
按下载量换算67

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills