Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

culture-architect文化建筑师

Agent Skill

culture-architect 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,152

周安装

49

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

404
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:culture-architect(文化建筑师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/culture-architect
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill culture-architect
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill culture-architect

简介

culture-architect 将文化转化为可观测行为与可衡量健康的操作系统。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中设计价值观落地仪式、心理安全与远程协作机制。
  • 提供文化债务识别、雇主品牌建设与规模化仪式感等实操工具集。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill culture-architect。
  • 使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发文件写入或流程定义操作。

SKILL.md

Culture Architect

Culture is what you DO, not what you SAY. This skill builds culture as an operational system -- observable behaviors, measurable health, and rituals that scale from 5 people to 500.

Keywords

culture, company culture, values, mission, vision, culture code, cultural rituals, culture health, values-to-behaviors, founder culture, culture debt, value-washing, culture assessment, culture survey, psychological safety, culture scaling, engagement, eNPS, remote culture, hybrid culture, culture clash, employer brand, onboarding culture, performance culture, recognition


Core Principle

Culture = (What you reward) + (What you tolerate) + (What you celebrate)

If your values say "transparency" but you punish bearers of bad news, your real value is "optics." Culture is not aspirational. It is descriptive. The work is closing the gap between stated and actual.


Culture Diagnostic Decision Tree

START: "How is our culture?"
  |
  v
[Run the Values Audit]
  Ask: "What did the last person who got promoted demonstrate?"
  |
  +-- Answer matches stated values --> Values are real. Check transmission.
  |     |
  |     v
  |   [Can a 30-day employee describe the culture accurately?]
  |     +-- YES --> Culture is operational. Maintain and evolve.
  |     +-- NO  --> Transmission gap. Fix onboarding and rituals.
  |
  +-- Answer differs from stated values --> Values are performative.
        |
        v
      [Do leaders model the real (non-stated) values?]
        +-- YES --> Rewrite values to match reality, then iterate.
        +-- NO  --> Deeper problem: no coherent culture exists. Build from scratch.

Framework 1: Mission / Vision / Values Workshop

Mission (Why We Exist)

ElementTestExample
Present-tenseIs it about what we do now, not what we aspire to?"We reduce preventable falls in elderly care"
SpecificCould a competitor claim the exact same thing? If yes, too generic.Not "We make the world better"
MeaningfulWould something be lost if we disappeared?Answer must be concrete

Vision (What Winning Looks Like)

QualityBadGood
Specificity"Be the market leader""Every care home in Europe uses our system by 2030"
Falsifiability"Transform healthcare""Reduce fall-related injuries by 50% in partner facilities"
TimelineNo date5-10 year horizon with milestones

Values (What We Actually Do)

RuleExplanation
3-5 values maximumMore than 5 and none are memorable
Derived from observation"What did our best hire do that nobody asked?"
Each has behavioral anchorsSpecific enough to judge against
Include the tensionGood values have a cost ("Speed" means "we accept some risk")

Framework 2: Values-to-Behaviors Translation

This is the work that makes values operational. Every value needs concrete behavioral anchors.

ValueVague VersionBehavioral AnchorHow You'd Observe It
Transparency"We're open and honest""We share bad news within 24 hours, including to our manager"Bad news travels fast, no surprises
Ownership"We take responsibility""We don't hand off problems -- we own until resolved, even across team boundaries"No orphaned issues
Speed"We move fast""Decisions under $5K happen at team level, same day"Low decision latency
Quality"We don't cut corners""We stop the line before shipping something we're not proud of"Teams delay launches for quality
Customer-first"Customers are our priority""Any team member can escalate a customer issue to leadership, bypassing normal channels"Escalation is celebrated, not punished

Translation Workshop (90 minutes)

For each value:
  Step 1: State the value in 2-3 words
  Step 2: Ask "How would a new hire know we live this on day 30?"
  Step 3: Write 3 observable behaviors that prove this value
  Step 4: Write 3 behaviors that violate this value
  Step 5: Ask "What does this value cost us? What's the trade-off?"
  Step 6: If no trade-off exists, it's not a value -- it's a platitude

Output: Value card with behaviors, violations, and trade-offs

Framework 3: Culture Code Creation

A culture code is a public document that describes how you operate. It should attract the right people and repel the wrong ones.

Culture Code Structure

SectionPurposeKey Question
1. Who We AreMission, context, stage"Why does this company exist?"
2. Who Thrives HereSpecific behaviors, not adjectives"What does success look like day-to-day?"
3. Who Doesn't Thrive HereHonest misfit description"When have we made a bad hire? What was the pattern?"
4. How We Make DecisionsDecision rights, speed expectations"Who can decide what, and how fast?"
5. How We CommunicateChannels, cadence, expectations"What can I expect in response time and transparency?"
6. How We Grow PeopleCareer development, feedback"What's my path here?"
7. What We Expect of LeadersLeadership behaviors"How should managers behave?"

Culture Code Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsBetter Alternative
"We're a family"Families don't fire for performance"We're a high-performing team that cares about each other"
Only positive traitsNot credible, doesn't help people self-selectInclude "who doesn't thrive here" section
Aspirational, not descriptiveCreates cynicism when reality differsDescribe what IS, then iterate
Too long (> 15 pages)Nobody reads itKeep to 5-8 pages, link to details
Never updatedBecomes irrelevant as company scalesReview annually, update at each stage

Framework 4: Culture Health Assessment

Run quarterly. Anonymous. 8-12 questions maximum.

Core Assessment Dimensions

DimensionQuestion ExampleWhat It Measures
Psychological safety"I can raise a concern without fear of negative consequences"Trust in the system
Clarity"I know how my work connects to company goals"Strategic alignment
Fairness"Decisions here are made consistently and transparently"Trust in leadership
Growth"I am learning and being challenged here"Development opportunity
Trust in leadership"I believe what leadership tells me"Communication credibility
Recognition"Good work is noticed and acknowledged"Reward system health
Belonging"I feel like I belong on this team"Inclusion effectiveness
Autonomy"I have enough freedom to do my best work"Micromanagement detection

Score Interpretation and Response

Score RangeStatusAction RequiredTimeline
80-100%HealthyDocument what works, celebrate, share practicesMaintain
65-79%WarningIdentify specific friction points, address top 2-330 days
50-64%DamagedLeadership attention required, specific interventions14 days
< 50%CrisisAll-hands intervention, external facilitation may be neededImmediate

eNPS Integration

eNPS Question: "On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to recommend
this company as a place to work?"

Promoters (9-10)    - Detractors (0-6)   = eNPS
-----------------------------------------
> 50  = Exceptional
30-50 = Good
10-30 = Acceptable
0-10  = Concerning
< 0   = Crisis

Framework 5: Cultural Rituals by Stage

Rituals are the delivery mechanism for culture. What works at 10 people breaks at 100.

Ritual Matrix

StageTeam SizeKey RitualsCulture Risk
Seed< 15Weekly all-hands (30 min), monthly retro, default transparencyCulture by osmosis -- works but won't scale
Early Growth15-50Quarterly culture survey, onboarding buddy, recognition program, leader office hoursFirst transmission failures appear
Scaling50-200Culture committee (peer-driven), values-based reviews, manager training, dept + company all-handsSubcultures form, drift begins
Large200+Annual culture plan with KPIs, internal NPS, subculture management, culture integration for M&ACulture becomes fragile without systems

Ritual Design Template

ElementDescription
NameClear, memorable name for the ritual
PurposeWhich value does this reinforce?
FrequencyWeekly, monthly, quarterly, annual
DurationTime commitment (shorter is better)
ParticipantsWho is involved, who leads
FormatIn-person, remote, hybrid
MeasurementHow do you know it's working?
Sunset criteriaWhen should this ritual be retired?

Framework 6: Culture Debt

Culture debt accumulates like technical debt: small compromises that compound.

Culture Debt Inventory

Debt TypeExampleCostFix Difficulty
Tolerated bad behaviorStar performer who is toxicTeam morale, attritionHigh (requires confrontation)
Stale valuesValues from founding team, never updatedCynicism, disengagementMedium (requires workshop)
Missing ritualsNo recognition system, no all-handsLow cohesion, isolationLow (design and implement)
Inconsistent enforcementSome people held to standards, others notTrust erosion, unfairnessHigh (requires consistency)
Osmosis-only transmissionNo onboarding for culture, just happensNew hires don't get itMedium (design onboarding)

Culture Debt Decision Tree

START: Culture debt identified
  |
  v
[Is it actively causing harm?]
  |
  +-- YES --> [Is the cost of fixing it < cost of keeping it?]
  |            |
  |            +-- YES --> Fix immediately. This week.
  |            +-- NO  --> Fix within 30 days. Plan the transition.
  |
  +-- NO  --> [Will it compound if ignored for 6 months?]
              |
              +-- YES --> Schedule fix within 90 days
              +-- NO  --> Document and monitor quarterly

Remote and Hybrid Culture

Remote Culture Operating Principles

PrincipleImplementation
Default to asyncWrite first, meet only when needed
Intentional socialRegular non-work social time (weekly)
Over-communicate decisionsDocument reasoning, share broadly
Equal accessRemote participants get equal voice in hybrid meetings
Visible workRegular updates so work is seen without surveillance

Hybrid Meeting Rules

RuleRationale
If one person is remote, everyone joins individuallyPrevents room-vs-screen dynamic
Camera-optional for working sessionsReduces fatigue
Shared document for all meetingsCreates equal participation
Record meetings with decisionsTimezone inclusion
No hallway decisions on hybrid daysExcludes remote team members

Red Flags

  • Values posted on wall, never referenced in reviews or decisions
  • Star performers protected from cultural standards -- destroys credibility
  • Leaders who "don't have time" for culture rituals -- signals culture isn't a priority
  • New hires feel culture is "different than advertised" -- culture code is fiction
  • No mechanism to raise cultural concerns safely -- problems go underground
  • Culture survey results not shared with team -- breeds distrust
  • Same values for 5+ years despite major scaling -- values are stale
  • Founders exempt from cultural norms -- "do as I say, not as I do"
  • No consequences for value violations -- values are suggestions, not standards
  • Culture committee is all HR, no peers -- becomes compliance, not culture

Integration with C-Suite

When...Culture Architect Works With...To...
Hiring surgeCHRO (chro-advisor)Ensure culture fit is measured, not guessed
Org restructureCOO + CEOManage culture disruption from structure change
M&A or partnershipCEO + COODetect and resolve culture clashes early
Performance issuesCHROSeparate culture misfit from skill deficit
Strategy pivotCEO (ceo-advisor)Update values that the pivot makes obsolete
Rapid growthAll C-suiteScale rituals before culture dilutes
Change rolloutChange Management (change-management)Cultural dimension of change
Operating system designCompany OS (company-os)Culture rituals in the meeting pulse
Founder evolutionFounder Coach (founder-coach)Leadership style impact on culture

Proactive Triggers

  • eNPS declining 2+ quarters -- investigate root cause before it becomes attrition
  • Rapid hiring (> 30% headcount growth in a quarter) -- culture transmission at risk
  • M&A announced -- culture integration plan needed immediately
  • Star performer exhibiting toxic behavior -- address within 1 week or culture debt compounds
  • Values haven't been reviewed in 2+ years -- schedule values refresh workshop
  • Remote team growing without intentional culture design -- isolation and drift risk
  • Exit interviews mention "culture" as departure reason -- pattern analysis needed

Output Artifacts

RequestDeliverable
"Build our values"Values workshop facilitation guide + values cards with behaviors
"Create a culture code"Culture code document (5-8 pages) with all 7 sections
"Assess our culture health"Survey design, score interpretation, action plan
"Design cultural rituals"Ritual calendar by stage with design templates
"Audit culture debt"Debt inventory with priority, cost, and fix plan
"Remote culture strategy"Operating principles, tools, rituals for distributed teams
"M&A culture integration"Culture comparison matrix, clash risk map, integration timeline

Tool Reference

1. culture_survey_analyzer.py

Analyzes culture health survey results across 8 dimensions (psychological safety, clarity, fairness, growth, trust, recognition, belonging, autonomy). Calculates dimension scores, overall health rating, identifies strengths and risks, and generates action recommendations.

python scripts/culture_survey_analyzer.py --input survey_data.json --json
python scripts/culture_survey_analyzer.py --input survey_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with survey responses (dimension scores per respondent, optional department/tenure metadata)
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

2. values_alignment_scorer.py

Scores alignment between stated values and observed behaviors using the Competing Values Framework quadrants (Clan, Adhocracy, Market, Hierarchy). Detects gaps between current and desired culture, identifies value-washing risks, and recommends alignment actions.

python scripts/values_alignment_scorer.py --input values_data.json --json
python scripts/values_alignment_scorer.py --input values_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with stated values, behavioral evidence scores, and optional CVF quadrant assessments
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

3. engagement_tracker.py

Tracks employee engagement metrics over time including eNPS, survey scores, participation rates, and retention correlation. Detects trends, flags declining dimensions, and generates quarterly engagement reports.

python scripts/engagement_tracker.py --input engagement_data.json --json
python scripts/engagement_tracker.py --input engagement_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with periodic engagement data (eNPS scores, survey results, participation rates, optional attrition data)
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Values posted on wall but never referenced in decisionsValues created as aspirational exercise, not operational toolRun values-to-behaviors workshop; tie values to performance reviews, hiring rubrics, and recognition
Culture survey scores declining quarter-over-quarterUnderlying issue not addressed after previous surveyAnalyze by dimension to isolate the declining area; share results transparently; commit to specific actions with deadlines
Star performer protected from cultural standardsLeadership avoidance or fear of losing outputAddress within 1 week; culture debt compounds daily; document impact on team morale and attrition
New hires say culture is "different than advertised"Culture code describes aspiration, not realityRewrite culture code to describe what IS; include "who doesn't thrive here" section honestly
eNPS declining but leadership claims culture is strongLeadership disconnected from frontline experience; survey results not sharedShare survey results with full team; conduct skip-level conversations; address top 2 detractor themes
Remote team members feel excluded from cultureRituals designed for in-person only; hallway decisions on hybrid daysApply Remote Culture Operating Principles; redesign rituals for hybrid; enforce "if one remote, all remote" meeting rule
Culture committee produces no measurable impactCommittee is all HR, no peers; no decision authority or budgetReconstitute with peer representatives; grant budget and decision authority; set quarterly culture OKRs

Success Criteria

  • Culture health score above 70% across all 8 assessment dimensions
  • eNPS above 30 (Good) sustained across 4 consecutive quarters
  • Values-to-behaviors translation completed for all stated values with observable anchors
  • 30-day employees can accurately describe the culture without prompting
  • Culture debt inventory reviewed quarterly with no "Critical" items unaddressed for more than 30 days
  • Survey participation rate above 80% indicating trust in the feedback process
  • Zero cultural standard exceptions for high performers (no "brilliant jerk" tolerance)

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Mission/vision/values workshop facilitation, values-to-behaviors translation, culture code creation, culture health assessment (8-dimension survey, eNPS), cultural rituals design by company stage, culture debt identification and management, remote/hybrid culture operating principles, M&A culture integration planning, and Competing Values Framework assessment.

Out of scope: HR policy creation (use hr-operations/), compensation and benefits design (use chro-advisor), DEI program management, employee relations and conflict resolution, performance management system design, and organizational restructuring (use coo-advisor). Tools analyze survey and engagement data; continuous culture monitoring requires integration with HR platforms.

Limitations: Culture assessment depends on honest survey responses; low participation rates (<50%) or fear of retaliation invalidate results. The Competing Values Framework provides a useful map but oversimplifies the complexity of real organizational culture. Culture change is slow (12-24 months for meaningful shifts); tools measure progress but cannot accelerate the human change process. M&A culture integration assessments are predictive, not deterministic.


Integration Points

  • chro-advisor -- Hiring for culture fit, performance reviews tied to values, attrition analysis linked to culture health
  • ceo-advisor -- Culture strategy aligns with company vision; values refresh tied to strategic pivots
  • coo-advisor -- Culture rituals embedded in operating rhythm; org restructures assessed for culture impact
  • change-management -- Cultural dimension of any major change initiative; resistance patterns mapped to culture type
  • founder-coach -- Leadership style impact on culture; founder behavior modeling assessed against stated values
  • company-os -- Culture rituals integrated into the organizational operating system meeting cadence

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.25%
按下载量换算146

Claude

27.29%
按下载量换算110

Cursor

18.96%
按下载量换算77

Gemini CLI

8.86%
按下载量换算36

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills