Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

contract-and-proposal-writer合同和提案撰写者

Agent Skill

contract-and-proposal-writer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,846

周安装

121

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

997
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:contract-and-proposal-writer(合同和提案撰写者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/contract-and-proposal-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill contract-and-proposal-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill contract-and-proposal-writer

简介

contract-and-proposal-writer 用于生成专业级商业文档,包括合同、提案与保密协议。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中起草 SOW、MSA 及按地域适配的法律条款。
  • 输出结构化 Markdown 并提供 DOCX/PDF 转换指引,覆盖 US/EU/UK/DACH 司法管辖区。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill contract-and-proposal-writer。
  • 使用前应确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发文件生成或外部导出操作。

SKILL.md

Contract & Proposal Writer

Tier: POWERFUL Category: Business Growth Tags: contracts, proposals, SOW, NDA, MSA, GDPR, legal templates, freelance

Overview

Generate professional, jurisdiction-aware business documents: freelance contracts, project proposals, statements of work, NDAs, and master service agreements. Outputs structured Markdown with conversion instructions for DOCX and PDF. Covers US (Delaware), EU (GDPR), UK, and DACH (German law) jurisdictions with clause libraries for each.

This is not a substitute for legal counsel. Use these templates as strong starting points. Review with an attorney for engagements over $50K or involving complex IP, equity, or regulatory requirements.


Core Capabilities

  • Fixed-price and hourly development contracts
  • Monthly consulting retainer agreements
  • Project proposals with timeline and budget breakdown
  • Statements of Work (SOW) with deliverables matrix and acceptance criteria
  • NDAs (mutual and one-way)
  • Master Service Agreements (MSA) with SOW attachment framework
  • SaaS partnership agreements (reseller, referral, white-label, integration)
  • GDPR Data Processing Addenda (Art. 28) for EU/DACH
  • Jurisdiction-specific clause library (US, EU, UK, DACH)
  • Change order and scope management clauses

Workflow

Step 1: Requirements Gathering

Gather before drafting:

QuestionWhy It Matters
Document type?Contract, proposal, SOW, NDA, MSA
Jurisdiction?US-Delaware, EU, UK, DACH
Engagement model?Fixed-price, hourly, retainer, revenue-share
Parties?Legal names, roles, registered addresses
Scope summary?1-3 sentences describing the work
Total value or rate?Drives payment terms and liability caps
Timeline?Start date, end date or duration, milestones
Special requirements?IP assignment, white-label, subcontractors, non-compete
Personal data involved?Triggers GDPR DPA requirement in EU/DACH

Step 2: Template Selection

Document TypeEngagement ModelTemplate
Dev contractFixed-priceTemplate A: Fixed-Price Development
Dev contractHourly/RetainerTemplate B: Consulting Retainer
PartnershipRevenue-shareTemplate C: SaaS Partnership
NDAMutualTemplate NDA-M
NDAOne-way (discloser/recipient)Template NDA-OW
SOWAnyTemplate SOW (attaches to MSA or standalone)
ProposalAnyTemplate P: Project Proposal

Step 3: Generate & Fill

Fill all [BRACKETED] placeholders. Flag missing information as [REQUIRED - description]. Never leave blanks -- an incomplete contract is more dangerous than no contract.

Step 4: Review Checklist

Before sending any generated document:

  • All [BRACKETED] placeholders filled
  • Correct jurisdiction selected and consistent throughout
  • Payment terms match engagement model
  • IP clause matches jurisdiction requirements
  • Liability cap is reasonable (typically 1x-3x contract value)
  • Termination clauses include both for-cause and for-convenience
  • DPA included if personal data is processed (EU/DACH mandatory)
  • Force majeure clause included for engagements over 3 months
  • Change order process defined for fixed-price contracts
  • Acceptance criteria defined for each deliverable

Clause Library

Payment Terms

ModelStandard TermsRisk Notes
Fixed-price50% upfront, 25% at beta, 25% at acceptanceBest for defined scope
HourlyNet-30, monthly invoicingRequires time tracking
RetainerMonthly prepaid, 1st of monthInclude overflow rate
MilestonePer-milestone invoicingDefine milestones precisely
Revenue-shareNet-30 after month close, minimum thresholdRequires audit rights

Late payment: 1.5% per month (US standard), up to statutory maximum in EU/DACH.

Intellectual Property

JurisdictionDefault IP OwnershipKey Requirement
US (Delaware)Work-for-hire doctrineMust be in writing, 9 qualifying categories
EUAuthor retains moral rightsSeparate written assignment needed
UKEmployer owns (if employee)Contractor: explicit assignment required
DACH (Germany)Author retains Urheberrecht permanentlyMust transfer Nutzungsrechte (usage rights) explicitly

Pre-existing IP: Always carve out pre-existing tools, libraries, and frameworks. Grant client a perpetual, royalty-free license to use pre-existing IP as embedded in deliverables.

Portfolio rights: Developer retains right to display work in portfolio unless client requests confidentiality in writing within 30 days.

Liability

Risk LevelCapWhen to Use
Standard1x total fees paidMost projects
High-risk3x total fees paidCritical infrastructure, regulated industries
Uncapped (mutual)No cap, mutual indemnificationEnterprise partnerships

Always exclude: Indirect, incidental, and consequential damages (both parties).

Termination

TypeNotice PeriodFinancial Treatment
For cause14-day cure periodPay for work completed
For convenience (client)30 days written noticePay for work completed + 10-20% of remaining value
For convenience (either)30-60 daysPay for work completed
Immediate (material breach uncured)7 days post-noticePro-rata payment

Confidentiality

  • Standard term: 3 years post-termination
  • Trade secrets: Perpetual (as long as information remains a trade secret)
  • Return/destruction: All confidential materials returned or certified destroyed within 30 days of termination
  • Exceptions: Publicly known, independently developed, received from third party, required by law

Dispute Resolution

JurisdictionRecommended ForumRules
USBinding arbitrationAAA Commercial Rules, Delaware venue
EUICC arbitration or local courtsICC Rules, venue in capital of governing law
UKLCIA arbitration, LondonLCIA Rules, English law
DACHDIS arbitration or LandgerichtDIS Rules, German law

Jurisdiction-Specific Requirements

US (Delaware)

  • Governing law: State of Delaware (most business-friendly)
  • Work-for-hire doctrine applies (Copyright Act 101)
  • Non-compete: Enforceable with reasonable scope/duration/geography
  • Electronic signatures: Valid under ESIGN Act and UETA

EU (GDPR)

  • Data Processing Addendum required if handling personal data
  • IP assignment may require separate written deed in some member states
  • Consumer protection laws may override contract terms for B2C
  • Right to withdraw within 14 days for distance contracts (B2C)

UK (Post-Brexit)

  • Governed by English law (most common choice)
  • IP: Patents Act 1977, CDPA 1988
  • UK GDPR (post-Brexit equivalent) applies for data processing
  • Electronic signatures: Valid under Electronic Communications Act 2000

DACH (Germany / Austria / Switzerland)

  • BGB (Buergerliches Gesetzbuch) governs contracts
  • Schriftform (written form) required for certain clauses (para 126 BGB)
  • Author always retains moral rights (Urheberpersoernlichkeitsrecht) -- cannot be transferred
  • Must explicitly transfer Nutzungsrechte (usage rights) with scope and duration
  • Non-competes: Maximum 2 years, compensation required (para 74 HGB)
  • DSGVO (German GDPR implementation) mandatory for personal data
  • Kuendigungsfristen: Statutory notice periods apply and cannot be shortened below minimum

GDPR Data Processing Addendum (Template Block)

Required for any EU/DACH engagement involving personal data:

## DATA PROCESSING ADDENDUM (Art. 28 GDPR/DSGVO)

Controller: [CLIENT LEGAL NAME]
Processor: [SERVICE PROVIDER LEGAL NAME]

### Processing Scope
Processor processes personal data solely to perform services under the Agreement.

### Categories of Data Subjects
[End users / Employees / Customers of Controller]

### Categories of Personal Data
[Names, email addresses, usage data, IP addresses, payment information]

### Processing Duration
Term of the Agreement. Deletion within [30] days of termination.

### Processor Obligations
1. Process only on Controller's documented instructions
2. Ensure authorized persons committed to confidentiality
3. Implement Art. 32 technical and organizational measures
4. Assist with data subject rights requests within [10] business days
5. Notify Controller of personal data breach within [72] hours
6. No sub-processors without prior written consent
7. Delete or return all personal data upon termination
8. Make available information to demonstrate compliance

### Current Sub-Processors
| Sub-Processor | Location | Purpose |
|--------------|----------|---------|
| [AWS/GCP/Azure] | [Region] | Cloud infrastructure |
| [Stripe] | [US/EU] | Payment processing |

### Cross-Border Transfers
Transfers outside EEA: [ ] Standard Contractual Clauses [ ] Adequacy Decision [ ] BCRs

Project Proposal Template (Template P)

# PROJECT PROPOSAL

**Prepared for:** [Client Name]
**Prepared by:** [Your Name / Company]
**Date:** [Date]
**Valid until:** [Date + 30 days]

---

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: what you will build, the business problem it solves, and the expected outcome]

## Understanding of Requirements
[Demonstrate you understand the client's problem. Reference their specific situation, not generic boilerplate]

## Proposed Solution
[Technical approach, architecture overview, technology choices with rationale]

## Scope of Work

### In Scope
- [Deliverable 1: specific description]
- [Deliverable 2: specific description]
- [Deliverable 3: specific description]

### Out of Scope
- [Explicitly list what is NOT included -- prevents scope creep]

### Assumptions
- [Client provides X by Y date]
- [Access to Z system will be available]

## Timeline

| Phase | Deliverables | Duration | Dates |
|-------|-------------|----------|-------|
| Discovery | Requirements document, architecture plan | 1 week | [Dates] |
| Development | Core features, API integration | 4 weeks | [Dates] |
| Testing | QA, UAT, bug fixes | 1 week | [Dates] |
| Launch | Deployment, monitoring, handoff | 1 week | [Dates] |

## Investment

| Item | Cost |
|------|------|
| Discovery & Planning | [Amount] |
| Development | [Amount] |
| Testing & QA | [Amount] |
| Project Management | [Amount] |
| **Total** | **[Amount]** |

### Payment Schedule
- 50% upon contract signing
- 25% at beta delivery
- 25% upon final acceptance

## Why Us
[2-3 concrete differentiators. Reference relevant experience, not just claims]

## Next Steps
1. Review and approve this proposal
2. Sign agreement (attached)
3. Kick-off meeting within [5] business days

Document Conversion

# Markdown to DOCX (basic)
pandoc contract.md -o contract.docx --reference-doc=template.docx

# With numbered sections (legal style)
pandoc contract.md -o contract.docx --number-sections -V fontsize=11pt

# Markdown to PDF (via LaTeX)
pandoc contract.md -o contract.pdf -V geometry:margin=1in -V fontsize=11pt

# Batch convert all contracts
for f in contracts/*.md; do
  pandoc "$f" -o "${f%.md}.docx" --reference-doc=template.docx
done

Common Pitfalls

PitfallConsequencePrevention
Missing IP assignment languageUnclear ownership, disputesAlways include explicit IP clause per jurisdiction
Vague acceptance criteriaEndless revision cyclesDefine "accepted" = written sign-off within X days
No change order processScope creep on fixed-priceInclude change order clause with pricing mechanism
Jurisdiction mismatchUnenforceable clausesMatch governing law to where parties operate
Missing liability capUnlimited exposureAlways cap liability at 1-3x contract value
Oral amendmentsUnenforceable modificationsRequire written amendments signed by both parties
No DPA for EU dataGDPR violation, up to 4% global revenue fineAlways include DPA when processing EU personal data
Missing force majeureNo protection against unforeseeable eventsInclude for engagements over 3 months

Best Practices

  1. Use milestone payments over net-30 for projects over $10K -- reduces cash flow risk for both parties
  2. Always include a change order clause in fixed-price contracts
  3. For DACH: include Schriftformklausel (written form clause) explicitly
  4. Define response time SLAs in retainer agreements (e.g., 4h urgent / 24h normal)
  5. Keep templates in version control; review annually as laws change
  6. For NDAs: always specify return/destruction of confidential materials on termination
  7. Include a survival clause -- specify which clauses survive termination (confidentiality, IP, liability)
  8. For EU/DACH: check if consumer protection laws apply (B2C engagements have additional requirements)

Related Skills

SkillUse When
ceo-advisorStrategic decisions about partnerships and business models
cfo-advisorFinancial terms, pricing strategy, revenue recognition
launch-strategyContract timing around product launches

Tool Reference

1. contract_clause_checker.py

Purpose: Validate a contract document (as structured JSON) against required clauses for a given jurisdiction and engagement type.

python scripts/contract_clause_checker.py contract.json --jurisdiction us-delaware
python scripts/contract_clause_checker.py contract.json --jurisdiction eu --json
FlagRequiredDescription
contract.jsonYesJSON file with contract clauses and metadata
--jurisdictionNoJurisdiction to check against: us-delaware, eu, uk, dach (default: us-delaware)
--typeNoContract type: fixed-price, hourly, retainer, nda, msa (default: fixed-price)
--jsonNoOutput results as JSON

2. proposal_cost_estimator.py

Purpose: Generate a project cost estimate with phase breakdown, payment schedule, and margin analysis.

python scripts/proposal_cost_estimator.py --hourly-rate 150 --hours 200 --phases 4
python scripts/proposal_cost_estimator.py --hourly-rate 150 --hours 200 --phases 4 --json
FlagRequiredDescription
--hourly-rateYesHourly rate in dollars
--hoursYesEstimated total hours
--phasesNoNumber of project phases (default: 3)
--marginNoDesired profit margin percentage (default: 20)
--currencyNoCurrency code (default: USD)
--jsonNoOutput results as JSON

3. contract_comparison_analyzer.py

Purpose: Compare two contract versions and identify differences in key clauses, payment terms, and risk areas.

python scripts/contract_comparison_analyzer.py contract_v1.json contract_v2.json
python scripts/contract_comparison_analyzer.py contract_v1.json contract_v2.json --json
FlagRequiredDescription
contract_v1.jsonYesJSON file with first contract version
contract_v2.jsonYesJSON file with second contract version
--jsonNoOutput results as JSON

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseSolution
Placeholders left in final documentRushed filling processUse contract_clause_checker.py to scan for unfilled [BRACKETED] placeholders before sending
IP clause is unenforceable in EU/DACHUsing US work-for-hire language in EU contextSwitch to explicit Nutzungsrechte transfer for DACH; use separate written assignment deed for EU
Client disputes scope after signingVague acceptance criteria or missing change order processDefine "accepted" = written sign-off within X business days; include change order clause with pricing mechanism
Payment disputes on hourly contractsNo time tracking requirement or unclear invoicing termsSpecify time tracking tool, invoicing frequency (monthly), and payment terms (net-30) in the contract
GDPR non-compliance penalty riskMissing DPA for EU/DACH engagements involving personal dataAlways include Art. 28 DPA when processing EU personal data; use the template block in this skill
Contract fails legal reviewJurisdiction mismatch or missing mandatory clausesRun contract_clause_checker.py against the target jurisdiction before legal review

Success Criteria

  • All [BRACKETED] placeholders filled before document delivery
  • Correct jurisdiction selected and consistent throughout (verified by contract_clause_checker.py)
  • Payment terms match engagement model with clear invoicing cadence
  • IP clause matches jurisdiction requirements (work-for-hire for US, Nutzungsrechte for DACH)
  • Liability cap set at 1-3x contract value with consequential damages excluded
  • DPA included for all EU/DACH engagements involving personal data
  • Change order process defined for all fixed-price contracts

Scope & Limitations

  • In scope: Contract templates, proposal generation, clause libraries, jurisdiction-specific compliance, document comparison, cost estimation
  • Out of scope: Legal advice, contract negotiation strategy, litigation support, regulatory filings
  • Not legal counsel: These templates are starting points; review with an attorney for engagements over $50K or involving complex IP, equity, or regulatory requirements
  • Jurisdiction coverage: US (Delaware), EU (general), UK, DACH (Germany/Austria/Switzerland); other jurisdictions may require additional legal review
  • Currency: Cost estimator defaults to USD; adjust for local currency in international engagements

Integration Points

  • ceo-advisor -- Strategic decisions about partnership structures and business models that drive contract type selection
  • cfo-advisor -- Financial terms, revenue recognition, and pricing strategy that inform payment schedule and margin targets
  • customer-success-manager -- SOW and MSA structures for customer engagements; renewal terms feed into CS workflows
  • pricing-strategy -- When proposal pricing needs strategic positioning against competitors or market rates
  • revenue-operations -- Contract values and payment schedules feed into pipeline forecasting and revenue recognition

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.88%
按下载量换算358

Claude

30.01%
按下载量换算299

Cursor

15.7%
按下载量换算157

Gemini CLI

8.97%
按下载量换算89

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills