Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

agenthubagenthub 搜索

Agent Skill

agenthub 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

745

周安装

32

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

261
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agenthub(agenthub 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/agenthub
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agenthub
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agenthub

简介

将复杂任务拆解为子任务并由专用代理协同完成,形成有向无环图(DAG)调度。

  • 适用于需要多角色协作的场景,如内容创作、数据分析与代码开发等。
  • 自动识别依赖关系并合并输出,提升处理效率与结果一致性。
  • 需明确各代理职责边界,避免重复工作或信息冲突。
  • agenthub 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

AgentHub - Multi-Agent DAG Orchestration

Category: Engineering / AI Agents Maintainer: Claude Skills Team

Overview

AgentHub provides patterns and tools for orchestrating multiple AI agents as a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Instead of one agent doing everything sequentially, AgentHub lets you decompose complex tasks into sub-tasks, assign each to a specialized agent, define dependencies between them, and merge their outputs into a coherent result.

The core insight: complex tasks decompose better than they scale. A 10-step sequential task run by one agent hits context limits and quality degradation. Five parallel agents with clear scopes and a merge step produce better results faster.

Sub-Skills

This skill uses compound sub-skill architecture. Each sub-skill in skills/ handles a stage of the orchestration lifecycle:

Sub-SkillFilePurpose
Initskills/init.mdInitialize a multi-agent workflow definition
Runskills/run.mdExecute a defined workflow end-to-end
Spawnskills/spawn.mdSpawn individual agents within a workflow
Boardskills/board.mdDashboard showing agent status and progress
Evalskills/eval.mdEvaluate agent outputs for quality and consistency
Mergeskills/merge.mdMerge outputs from multiple agents into final result
Statusskills/status.mdShow workflow execution status and health

Sub-Skill Flow

Init ──> Run ──> Spawn (parallel) ──> Eval ──> Merge
                      │                            │
                    Board ◄──── Status ◄───────────┘

Lifecycle: Init defines the workflow DAG, Run orchestrates execution, Spawn creates individual agents, Board provides real-time visibility, Eval checks output quality, Merge combines results, and Status reports overall health.

Scripts

ScriptPurpose
scripts/dag_analyzer.pyAnalyze DAG definitions for cycles, unreachable nodes, and bottlenecks
scripts/board_manager.pyManage agent task boards with status tracking
scripts/result_ranker.pyRank and merge outputs from multiple agents
scripts/session_manager.pyManage orchestration sessions and state

Core Concepts

Workflow DAG

A workflow is a directed acyclic graph where:

  • Nodes are agent tasks with a defined scope, inputs, and expected outputs
  • Edges are dependencies: agent B cannot start until agent A completes
  • Root nodes have no dependencies and start immediately
  • Terminal nodes have no dependents and feed into the merge step
┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐
│ Research  │────>│ Analysis │────>│  Merge   │
│  Agent    │     │  Agent   │     │  Agent   │
└──────────┘     └──────────┘     └──────────┘
                       ▲
┌──────────┐           │
│ Data      │──────────┘
│ Agent     │
└──────────┘

Workflow Definition Format

{
  "name": "market-analysis",
  "description": "Comprehensive market analysis for product launch",
  "agents": {
    "researcher": {
      "task": "Research competitor landscape and market size",
      "inputs": ["product_description"],
      "outputs": ["competitor_list", "market_size"],
      "dependencies": []
    },
    "data_collector": {
      "task": "Collect pricing and feature data from competitors",
      "inputs": ["competitor_list"],
      "outputs": ["pricing_data", "feature_matrix"],
      "dependencies": ["researcher"]
    },
    "analyst": {
      "task": "Analyze positioning opportunities and pricing strategy",
      "inputs": ["pricing_data", "feature_matrix", "market_size"],
      "outputs": ["positioning_report", "pricing_recommendation"],
      "dependencies": ["data_collector", "researcher"]
    },
    "writer": {
      "task": "Write executive summary combining all findings",
      "inputs": ["positioning_report", "pricing_recommendation"],
      "outputs": ["executive_summary"],
      "dependencies": ["analyst"]
    }
  },
  "config": {
    "max_parallel": 3,
    "timeout_per_agent": 300,
    "retry_on_failure": true,
    "quality_threshold": 0.7
  }
}

Agent States

StateDescription
PENDINGWaiting for dependencies to complete
READYAll dependencies met, queued for execution
RUNNINGCurrently executing
COMPLETEDFinished successfully
FAILEDFailed after all retries
SKIPPEDSkipped due to upstream failure
EVALUATINGOutput being evaluated for quality

Execution Strategy

  1. Topological sort the DAG to determine execution order
  2. Identify parallel groups: nodes with no inter-dependencies run simultaneously
  3. Execute root nodes first (no dependencies)
  4. Chain results: completed node outputs become inputs for dependents
  5. Evaluate outputs at quality gates
  6. Merge terminal outputs into final result

Workflows

Workflow 1: Define and Validate

1. Define agents with tasks, inputs, outputs, dependencies
2. Run dag_analyzer.py to validate:
   - No cycles in the dependency graph
   - All referenced inputs are produced by upstream agents
   - No unreachable nodes
   - Critical path length is acceptable
3. Estimate execution time based on agent count and dependencies

Workflow 2: Execute Orchestration

1. Load workflow definition
2. Initialize session (session_manager.py)
3. Topological sort to determine execution order
4. For each parallel group:
   a. Spawn agents (up to max_parallel)
   b. Monitor progress on board
   c. Collect outputs on completion
   d. Evaluate outputs against quality threshold
5. Pass outputs to downstream agents as inputs
6. Merge final outputs
7. Generate execution report

Workflow 3: Evaluate and Iterate

1. Collect all agent outputs
2. Run quality evaluation (eval sub-skill)
3. Rank outputs by quality score (result_ranker.py)
4. If any output below threshold:
   a. Retry the agent with adjusted instructions
   b. Or flag for human review
5. Merge passing outputs into final result

Common Patterns

Fan-Out / Fan-In

Multiple independent agents work in parallel, then a single agent merges results:

Task A ──┐
Task B ──┼──> Merge
Task C ──┘

Pipeline

Sequential agents where each transforms the previous output:

Extract ──> Transform ──> Load ──> Validate

Reducer

Multiple agents produce competing outputs, ranked and best one selected:

Agent 1 ──┐
Agent 2 ──┼──> Rank ──> Best Output
Agent 3 ──┘

Validator Chain

Each agent validates the previous agent's work:

Generate ──> Review ──> Fix ──> Approve

Best Practices

  1. Small, focused agent scopes -- each agent should have a single clear objective
  2. Explicit inputs/outputs -- never rely on implicit shared state between agents
  3. Quality gates between stages -- evaluate before passing outputs downstream
  4. Timeout per agent -- prevent runaway agents from blocking the workflow
  5. Retry with context -- when retrying a failed agent, include the failure reason
  6. Merge strategy documented -- how competing or complementary outputs combine
  7. Critical path awareness -- optimize the longest dependency chain first
  8. Idempotent agents -- agents should produce the same output given the same input

Common Pitfalls

PitfallWhy It HappensFix
Cycle in DAGAgent A depends on B which depends on ARun dag_analyzer.py before execution
Output format mismatchAgent B expects JSON, Agent A produces markdownDefine explicit output schemas per agent
Single bottleneck agentOne agent depends on everythingRestructure DAG to parallelize dependencies
Lost context between agentsOutputs too terse for downstream useRequire structured output with context preservation
Quality degradation in mergeNaive concatenation loses coherenceUse a dedicated merge agent with synthesis instructions
Runaway execution timeNo timeouts, retry loopsSet timeout_per_agent and max retries

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Workflow hangs at agent NDependency not met or agent timeoutCheck board for PENDING agents; verify upstream completed; check timeout config
Merged output is incoherentNo merge strategy definedUse the merge sub-skill with explicit synthesis instructions
Agent produces wrong formatInput/output contract unclearDefine JSON schemas for agent inputs and outputs
DAG validation fails with cycleCircular dependency in definitionUse dag_analyzer.py to identify the cycle; restructure the dependency chain
Quality eval fails everythingThreshold too strict for task complexityLower threshold or add a revision step before eval

Success Criteria

  • DAG validation passes on every workflow definition before execution
  • Parallel execution utilization above 60% -- agents running in parallel most of the time
  • Quality gate pass rate above 80% -- agent outputs meet threshold on first attempt
  • End-to-end execution time within 2x critical path -- parallelization delivers real speedup
  • Zero lost outputs -- every agent's output is captured and available for merge/review
  • Merge coherence score above 0.7 -- final merged output reads as a unified deliverable

Scope and Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Multi-agent workflow design with DAG dependency graphs
  • Agent spawning, monitoring, and lifecycle management
  • Output quality evaluation and ranking
  • Result merging strategies for coherent final deliverables

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Individual agent design or prompt engineering (see agent-designer)
  • Agent memory and self-improvement (see self-improving-agent)
  • Infrastructure for running agents (compute, scheduling, deployment)
  • Real-time streaming communication between agents

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
agent-designerDefines individual agent capabilities that become DAG nodesAgent specs flow in; execution results flow back for agent tuning
self-improving-agentEach agent can use self-improvement patterns to get betterSession feedback from orchestration feeds into agent learning loops
prompt-engineer-toolkitAgent task prompts benefit from prompt engineeringOptimized prompts improve individual agent quality within the DAG
context-engineManages what context each agent seesContext retrieval provides relevant inputs to each spawned agent
observability-designerMonitors workflow execution and agent healthAgent state transitions and timing metrics feed into dashboards

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.44%
按下载量换算92

Claude

28.01%
按下载量换算73

Cursor

19.02%
按下载量换算50

Gemini CLI

9.58%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agenthub 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills