Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

blog-geo博客地理

Agent Skill

blog-geo 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,350

周安装

96

GitHub Stars

628

下载量

753
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:blog-geo(博客地理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-blog
仓库路径:skills/blog-geo
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-blog --skill blog-geo
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-blog --skill blog-geo

简介

用于评估博客在 ChatGPT、Perplexity 等平台被 AI 引用的可能性。

  • 适合追求“AI 可发现性”的内容创作者优化段落长度与信息密度。
  • 输出 Citation Readiness 评分与平台特异性改进建议清单。
  • 安装方式:GitHub 仓库,使用 npx skills add 命令添加;依赖 Ahrefs 等基准数据集。
  • 注意:高分不等于自动引用,仍取决于 AI 模型训练数据覆盖范围。

SKILL.md

Blog GEO -- AI Citation Optimization Audit

Scores blog posts for AI citation readiness across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Generates citation capsules and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score with platform-specific recommendations.

Key Research Data

Reference these benchmarks throughout the audit:

  • Only 11% of domains cited by both ChatGPT and Perplexity (Digital Bloom, domain-level)
  • 80% of LLM citations don't rank in Google's top 100 (Ahrefs)
  • Brands 6.5x more likely cited through third-party sources (AirOps)
  • 120-180 word sections get 70% more ChatGPT citations (SE Ranking, Nov 2025)
  • Comparison tables with <thead> achieve 47% higher AI citation rates (directional)
  • Content freshness: 76.4% of top citations updated within 30 days (Ahrefs, ~17M citations)

Audit Process

Step 1: Read Content

Extract from the blog post:

  • Full content text and word count
  • Heading structure (H1, H2, H3 hierarchy)
  • Individual paragraphs and their word counts
  • FAQ sections (if present)
  • Schema markup (JSON-LD, microdata, RDFa)
  • robots.txt mentions or meta robots directives
  • Any TL;DR or summary boxes
  • Comparison tables and their HTML structure
  • Numbered/ordered lists
  • Definition-style formatting

Step 2: Passage-Level Citability (4 pts)

Check each section between headings for AI-extractable passages:

CheckCriteria
Word countEach section contains 120-180 word self-contained passages
Context independenceEach passage makes sense extracted from surrounding context
Claim structurePassages contain: specific claim + supporting evidence + source attribution
CompletenessPassage answers a question without requiring reader to read adjacent sections

Scoring: Count passages meeting all criteria vs total sections.

  • 4 pts: 80%+ sections have citable passages
  • 3 pts: 60-79%
  • 2 pts: 40-59%
  • 1 pt: 20-39%
  • 0 pts: <20%

Step 3: Q&A Formatting (3 pts)

Check heading format and answer structure:

CheckCriteria
Question headings60-70% of H2s are phrased as questions
Answer-first formatOpening paragraph under each H2 provides a direct answer
FAQ sectionDedicated FAQ section with structured question-answer pairs

Scoring:

  • 3 pts: All three criteria met
  • 2 pts: Two criteria met
  • 1 pt: One criterion met
  • 0 pts: None met

Step 4: Entity Clarity (3 pts)

Check topic consistency and disambiguation:

CheckCriteria
Canonical topicOne unambiguous primary topic per page
Consistent namingSame entity name used throughout (no confusing synonyms)
Intro statementClear topic statement in the introduction paragraph
Title-content matchTitle accurately reflects the content focus

Scoring:

  • 3 pts: All four criteria met
  • 2 pts: Three criteria met
  • 1 pt: One or two criteria met
  • 0 pts: None met

Step 5: Content Structure for Extraction (3 pts)

Check for AI-extractable content patterns:

CheckCriteria
TL;DR box40-60 word standalone summary present at top
Comparison tablesTables with proper HTML <thead> (47% higher citation rate)
Ordered listsNumbered lists for processes and step-by-step instructions
Definition formattingKey terms formatted with clear definition patterns
Citation capsules40-60 word definitive statements in each major section

Scoring:

  • 3 pts: 4-5 elements present
  • 2 pts: 3 elements present
  • 1 pt: 1-2 elements present
  • 0 pts: None present

Step 6: AI Crawler Accessibility (2 pts)

Check technical requirements for AI crawler indexing:

CheckCriteria
Static HTMLContent rendered in static HTML, not behind JavaScript
robots.txtAllows AI crawlers: GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot
Schema in HTMLSchema markup in static HTML, not JS-injected
Page sizeReasonable page size within AI crawler limits

Scoring:

  • 2 pts: All criteria met
  • 1 pt: Most criteria met but one issue
  • 0 pts: Multiple issues blocking AI crawlers

Step 7: Platform-Specific Analysis

Evaluate the post for each AI platform's citation preferences:

ChatGPT

  • Favors "Best X" listicles (43.8% of citations)
  • Prefers well-cited, authoritative content
  • Recency matters -- recent updates get priority
  • Domain authority influences citation likelihood

Perplexity

  • Favors Reddit sources (6.6% of all citations)
  • Rapid content decay: 2-3 day citation window
  • Freshness is the most critical factor
  • Community-validated content preferred

Google AI Overviews

  • Favors Google properties (23% of citations)
  • High Domain Rating strongly correlated with citation
  • Present in 49% of SERPs
  • Prefers content that already ranks well organically

For each platform, provide:

  • Current citability rating (High / Medium / Low)
  • Specific improvements to increase citation likelihood
  • Content format recommendations

Step 8: Generate Citation Capsules

For each H2 section in the post, write a citation capsule:

  • Length: 40-60 words, self-contained
  • Structure: Specific claim + data point + source attribution
  • Purpose: A passage AI could directly quote as a citation
  • Format: Present as a suggested addition the author can embed

Example:

According to [Source], [specific claim with number]. This represents
[context/comparison], making it [significance]. [Supporting detail
that reinforces the claim].

Generate one capsule per H2 section. Label each with the section heading it belongs under.

Step 9: Calculate AI Citation Readiness Score (0-100)

Map the 15-point subcategory scores to a 0-100 display score:

CategoryRaw PointsDisplay WeightMax Display Score
Passage-Level Citability/4x6.7527
Q&A Formatting/3x6.6720
Entity Clarity/3x6.6720
Content Structure/3x6.6720
AI Crawler Accessibility/2x6.513
Total/15100

Rating thresholds:

  • 90-100: Excellent -- highly citable by AI systems
  • 70-89: Good -- citable with minor improvements
  • 50-69: Needs Work -- significant gaps in citability
  • Below 50: Poor -- major restructuring needed

Step 10: Generate Report

Output the following report:

## AI Citation Readiness Report: [Title]

**AI Citation Readiness Score: [X]/100** -- [Rating]

### Score Breakdown
| Category | Raw | Display | Max |
|----------|-----|---------|-----|
| Passage-Level Citability | X/4 | X | 27 |
| Q&A Formatting | X/3 | X | 20 |
| Entity Clarity | X/3 | X | 20 |
| Content Structure | X/3 | X | 20 |
| AI Crawler Accessibility | X/2 | X | 13 |
| **Total** | **X/15** | **X** | **100** |

### Per-Section Citability Analysis
| Section (H2) | Word Count | Self-Contained | Claim+Evidence | Citable |
|---------------|-----------|----------------|----------------|---------|
| [heading] | [N] | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |

### Platform-Specific Optimization
#### ChatGPT
- [specific recommendations]

#### Perplexity
- [specific recommendations]

#### Google AI Overviews
- [specific recommendations]

### Generated Citation Capsules

#### [H2 Section 1]
> [40-60 word citation capsule]

#### [H2 Section 2]
> [40-60 word citation capsule]

### Technical Recommendations
- [ ] [Technical fix with specifics]

### Priority Action Items
1. [Most impactful improvement]
2. [Second most impactful]
3. [Third most impactful]

Run `/blog analyze <file>` for full content quality scoring.

Optional: Search Performance Context (blog-google)

If blog-google credentials include Tier 1 (GSC) and the post has a published URL:

  1. Query GSC: python3 skills/blog-google/scripts/run.py gsc_query --property <property> --filter-page <url> --json
  2. Add to platform-specific analysis:

- Current impressions, clicks, CTR, average position - Search queries driving traffic to this URL

  1. Check indexation: python3 skills/blog-google/scripts/run.py gsc_inspect <url> --json
  2. Report indexation status, canonical selection, mobile usability.
  3. Falls back silently if not configured.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.28%
按下载量换算266

Claude

31.2%
按下载量换算235

Cursor

20.84%
按下载量换算157

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算75

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills