Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

blade-inspection叶片检查

Agent Skill

blade-inspection 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

10,698

周安装

437

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,426
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:blade-inspection(叶片检查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sertug17/blade-inspection
安装命令:
openclaw skills install blade-inspection
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install blade-inspection

简介

blade-inspection 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 根据目视检查数据评估风力涡轮机叶片状况,分类七种故障模式及严重程度。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装并使用 openclaw skills install blade-inspection 命令部署。
  • 需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 建议结合原始 README 和来源仓库进一步验证具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

name
wind-turbine-blade-inspection
description
Assesses wind turbine blade condition from visual inspection data. Classifies damage type and severity (1-5) across seven failure modes and recommends repair or operational actions.
version
1.0.0
author
Sertug17
license
MIT
metadata
hermes
tags
[Energy, Maintenance, Wind-Turbine, Blade, Drone-Inspection, Erosion, Lightning, Structural, Debonding]
related_skills
[wind-turbine-gearbox]

Wind Turbine Blade Inspection Intelligence

Evaluates blade condition from drone or ground-based visual inspection and produces a structured damage assessment across seven failure modes.

When to Use

Load this skill when the user wants to:

  • Assess blade health from drone inspection images or written findings
  • Classify damage type and severity on a 1-5 scale per blade and per zone
  • Determine whether a turbine should continue operating, be scheduled for repair, or shut down
  • Generate a structured blade inspection report with repair recommendations

Blade Zones

ZoneSpanDescription
Root0-33%Highest structural loads, bolted connection area
Mid33-66%Transition zone, moderate aerodynamic load
Tip66-100%Highest velocity, most erosion-prone, lightning receptor area

Surfaces: Leading Edge (LE), Trailing Edge (TE), Suction Side (SS), Pressure Side (PS)

Damage Type Definitions

Damage TypeDescriptionTypical Location
Surface crackGelcoat or laminate cracks, linear fracturesLE, TE, root transition
Erosion / wearMaterial loss, pitting, rougheningLE tip zone
Lightning damageBurn marks, punctures, receptor damageTip, receptor area
Lamination/structuralDelamination, fiber exposure, buckling, dentsAny zone
DebondingBond line separation at LE, TE, or shear webLE, TE, internal
Ice accumulationIce buildup on surface or edgesAny zone
General visual anomalyDiscoloration, contamination, coating lossAny zone

Severity Scale

SeverityLabelDescriptionAction
1HealthyNo damage or cosmetic marks onlyContinue normal operation
2MinorEarly erosion, superficial cracks, coating lossIncrease inspection frequency
3ModerateGelcoat breach, early debonding, defined damageRepair within 1-3 months
4SignificantStructural involvement, active debonding, lightningRepair within 2-4 weeks
5CriticalFiber exposure, structural breach, delaminationImmediate shutdown required

Procedure

  1. Collect inputs: blade IDs, inspection method, findings per blade per zone per surface.
  2. Classify each finding by damage type.
  3. Assign severity per finding using the severity scale.
  4. Determine overall blade severity as the highest finding for that blade.
  5. Determine turbine-level severity as the highest across all blades.
  6. Apply damage-specific rules:

- Lightning damage: minimum Severity 4 until OEM confirms otherwise. - Debonding at LE or TE over 300 mm: escalate to Severity 4. - Any confirmed fiber exposure: minimum Severity 4. - Erosion with full gelcoat loss over 500 mm span at tip: Severity 4. - Active ice accumulation: always Severity 4.

  1. Generate output report using the format below.

Output Format

=== BLADE INSPECTION REPORT ===

ASSET : [Turbine ID] SITE : [Site name] INSPECTION : [Date / Method] BLADES : [Number inspected]

BLADE [ID]: Zone/Surface : [e.g., Tip / Leading Edge] Damage Type : [e.g., Erosion] Description : [e.g., Deep pitting ~600 mm span, gelcoat fully lost] Severity : [1-5] - [Label]

BLADE [ID] OVERALL SEVERITY: [1-5] - [Label]

TURBINE-LEVEL SEVERITY : [1-5] - [Label] SHUTDOWN RECOMMENDATION: [Yes / No / Conditional]

REPAIR PRIORITY: - [e.g., Blade 2 tip LE erosion - schedule LEP repair within 6 weeks]

MONITORING STRATEGY: - [e.g., Monthly drone re-inspection for all blades]

ESCALATION TRIGGERS: - [e.g., Debond length exceeds 500 mm - shutdown for repair] - [e.g., SCADA vibration or imbalance alarms - ground turbine]

Damage-Specific Guidance

Erosion: Progresses from roughening to pitting to gelcoat loss to fiber exposure. Repair with Leading Edge Protection (LEP) tape or coating. Severity 3-4 causes measurable energy production loss.

Lightning: Always notify OEM. Minor visible damage may hide internal delamination. Do not assume safe to operate until specialist confirms.

Debonding: LE debonding causes aerodynamic noise and vibration. TE debonding starts at tip and progresses toward root. Bond line gap over 300 mm is Severity 4.

Lamination/Structural: Fiber exposure is always Severity 4 minimum. Dents or buckling without fiber exposure is Severity 3.

Ice: Active ice requires immediate grounding due to rotor imbalance and ice throw risk. After melting, inspect surface for underlying damage.

Pitfalls

  • Do not classify erosion from low-resolution images. Ask for close-up zone-specific photos.
  • Lightning damage is always higher priority than it looks. Treat as Severity 4 until proven otherwise.
  • Debonding can be invisible from drone imagery. If SCADA shows imbalance alarms, flag potential hidden debonding.
  • Active ice is a safety hazard. Recommend immediate grounding.
  • Assess each blade independently. Damage distribution is rarely uniform across all three blades.

Verification

After generating the report, confirm with the user:

  • Does the severity match the inspector's on-site assessment?
  • Are all three blades accounted for?
  • Are there SCADA alarms (vibration, imbalance, power curve deviation) correlating with findings?
  • Is there a previous inspection report for trend comparison?

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

95.56%
按下载量换算3,274

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills