Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

biz-financial-ratios企业财务比率

Agent Skill

biz-financial-ratios 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

399

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

125

下载量

129
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:biz-financial-ratios(企业财务比率)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/biz-financial-ratios
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-financial-ratios
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-financial-ratios

简介

biz-financial-ratios 将财务报表转化为五大类可比指标,辅助评估企业健康状况。

  • 适用于尽职调查、信用分析或跨期业绩对比等需要量化评估的场景。
  • 使用时需提供完整财报,工具生成流动性、盈利性、偿债能力等比率并提示解读要点。
  • 安装需通过 npx 添加 GitHub 仓库,建议确认是否包含行业基准数据库。
  • 注意:分类为待分类,强调比率需结合趋势与同行比较才有意义,避免孤立使用。

SKILL.md

Financial Ratio Analysis

Overview

Financial ratio analysis transforms raw financial statements into comparable metrics across five categories. Ratios are meaningful only in context — compare against industry benchmarks, historical trends, and peer companies.

When to Use

Trigger conditions:

  • User has financial statements and needs to assess company health
  • User comparing financial performance across companies
  • User performing due diligence or credit analysis
  • User asks "is this company financially healthy?" or "analyze these numbers"

When NOT to use:

  • For valuation → use DCF or comparables
  • For ROE deep-dive → use DuPont Analysis
  • For strategic assessment → use SWOT

Framework

IRON LAW: Ratios Without Context Are Meaningless

A current ratio of 1.5 means nothing alone. Is 1.5 good? Compare to:
1. Industry average (retail ~1.2, manufacturing ~1.8)
2. Company's own trend (was it 2.0 last year? → declining liquidity)
3. Peers (competitor has 2.5? → relatively weak)

NEVER report a ratio without at least one comparison point.
IRON LAW: All Five Categories, Every Time

Analyzing only profitability misses a leveraged company about to default.
Analyzing only liquidity misses a profitable company's growth potential.
Cover all five categories for a complete picture.

The Five Categories

1. Profitability — Is the company making money?

RatioFormulaMeasures
Gross Margin(Revenue - COGS) / RevenueProduction efficiency
Operating MarginEBIT / RevenueCore business profitability
Net MarginNet Income / RevenueBottom-line profitability
ROENet Income / EquityReturn to shareholders
ROANet Income / Total AssetsAsset productivity

2. Liquidity — Can it pay short-term obligations?

RatioFormulaHealthy
Current RatioCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities> 1.5
Quick Ratio(Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities> 1.0
Cash RatioCash / Current LiabilitiesContext-dependent

3. Leverage — How much debt is used?

RatioFormulaMeasures
Debt-to-EquityTotal Liabilities / EquityCapital structure
Interest CoverageEBIT / Interest ExpenseAbility to service debt
Debt-to-AssetsTotal Liabilities / Total AssetsAsset financing
⚠️ "Debt" definition: This skill (and the bundled script) defines "Debt" in the leverage ratios as Total Liabilities — not "long-term debt only" or "interest-bearing debt only". Both alternative definitions exist in textbooks and produce materially different ratios. If you need a different definition, document the choice explicitly and compute it manually; do not silently substitute.

4. Efficiency — How well are assets used?

RatioFormulaMeasures
Inventory TurnoverCOGS / Avg InventoryInventory management
Receivables TurnoverRevenue / Avg ReceivablesCollection speed
Asset TurnoverRevenue / Total AssetsAsset productivity
Cash Conversion CycleDIO + DSO - DPOCash cycle speed

5. Valuation — Is the stock fairly priced?

RatioFormulaMeasures
P/EPrice / EPSPrice vs earnings
EV/EBITDAEnterprise Value / EBITDAPrice vs cash generation
P/BPrice / Book Value per SharePrice vs net assets
Dividend YieldDividend per Share / PriceIncome return

Analysis Process

  1. Calculate all relevant ratios from financial statements
  2. Compare against industry benchmarks and 3-year trend
  3. Identify red flags (declining trends, outliers vs peers)
  4. Synthesize a financial health verdict across all five categories
  5. Recommend actions based on weak areas

Output Format

⚠️ Decimal vs percent: The bundled script returns all profitability ratios (gross_margin, operating_margin, net_margin, roa, roe) as decimals0.35 means 35%, NOT 35.0. Liquidity and leverage ratios are already unitless multiples (e.g. current_ratio: 2.125). Render percentages only in the human-facing markdown report, never in JSON outputs.
# Financial Ratio Analysis: {Company}

## Summary Dashboard
| Category | Status | Key Metric |
|----------|--------|-----------|
| Profitability | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Liquidity | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Leverage | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Efficiency | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Valuation | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |

## Detailed Ratios
{Tables per category with ratio, value, industry avg, trend}

## Red Flags
- {specific concern with data}

## Overall Assessment
{Synthesized financial health verdict}

Examples

Correct Application

Scenario: Ratio analysis for a Taiwanese electronics manufacturer

RatioCompanyIndustryTrendFlag
Gross Margin18%22%↓ from 21%🔴 Below peers, declining
Current Ratio1.81.5→ stable🟢 Adequate
D/E1.20.8↑ from 0.9🟡 Rising leverage
Inventory Turnover4.2x6.0x↓ from 5.1x🔴 Slow inventory

Synthesis: Profitability weakening + inventory building up + leverage rising = potential working capital crisis ahead ✓

Incorrect Application

  • Reported "Gross Margin 18%" as standalone fact → No comparison. Is 18% good or bad? Violates Iron Law: ratios without context.
  • Only analyzed profitability ratios, missed D/E of 4.5x → Company appeared healthy by margins but was dangerously overleveraged. Violates Iron Law: all five categories.

Gotchas

  • Industry matters enormously: A 5% net margin is terrible for software (expect 20-30%) but excellent for grocery retail (expect 2-3%). Always benchmark within industry.
  • One-time items: Restructuring charges, asset sales, or legal settlements distort ratios for that period. Use adjusted figures or note the distortion.
  • Seasonal businesses: Ratios at different quarter-ends tell different stories. Use trailing 12-month or compare same quarter YoY.
  • Off-balance-sheet items: Operating leases (pre-IFRS 16), special purpose vehicles, and contingent liabilities may not appear in standard ratios. Check footnotes.
  • Growth companies look "unhealthy": High-growth companies often have low profitability, high leverage, and negative cash flow by design. Context matters.

Scripts

ScriptDescriptionUsage
scripts/financial_ratios.pyCompute standard liquidity, leverage, profitability, and efficiency ratiospython scripts/financial_ratios.py --help

Run python scripts/financial_ratios.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.

References

  • For industry-specific benchmark ranges, see references/industry-benchmarks.md
  • For DuPont deep-dive on ROE, see the biz-dupont skill

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.11%
按下载量换算44

Claude

29.36%
按下载量换算38

Cursor

19.75%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

9.3%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills