Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

beo-exploring贝奥探索

Agent Skill

beo-exploring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

465

周安装

19

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

150
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:beo-exploring(贝奥探索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills
仓库路径:skills/beo-exploring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills --skill beo-exploring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills --skill beo-exploring

简介

将模糊请求转化为可规划的具体 CONTEXT.md 文档。

  • 通过分类与代码库扫描明确 scope 与潜在风险点。
  • 决定 feature 类型(SEE/CALL/RUN/READ/ORGANIZE)以指导后续行动。
  • 必须读取既有 context 与 learnings,避免重复劳动。
  • beo-exploring 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Beo Exploring

Overview

Exploring is the decision-extraction phase. Use it to turn a partially formed request into a planning-usable CONTEXT.md.

See ../reference/references/shared-hard-gates.md § Shared References Convention.

Core principle: ask until planning can proceed without guessing.

CONTEXT.md becomes the source of truth for downstream planning, validation, execution, and review.

Hard Gates

Default Exploring Loop

  1. read any existing context and prior learnings
  2. classify the scope and likely gray areas
  3. classify the feature domain (SEE, CALL, RUN, READ, or ORGANIZE)
  4. run a codebase scout: use that domain classification to identify likely artifacts, protocols, templates, or entry points, then read 2-3 relevant files to ground gray areas in existing repo patterns
  5. repeat until all gray areas are resolved: a. ask one focused behavioral question b. wait for the user's response — do not continue until the user answers c. annotate gray areas with existing context when available d. lock decisions explicitly as they emerge
  6. write a sanitized CONTEXT.md
  7. self-check for planning readiness, then hand off to beo-planning

Use ../reference/references/learnings-read-protocol.md when you need the canonical prior-learnings read flow. Use ../reference/references/artifact-conventions.md#slug-lifecycle when updating the epic description safely.

Scope Classification

Classify the feature as Quick, Standard, or Deep and record that classification in the exploring output.

  • Quick uses the canonical definition in ../reference/references/pipeline-contracts.md.
  • Standard is the default path for normal feature work.
  • Deep applies when the work spans multiple systems or needs extra discovery depth.

Quick work still needs gray-area discovery, but it must still satisfy the canonical Quick definition from ../reference/references/pipeline-contracts.md and it skips self-review.

Read Existing Context First

Before asking new questions:

  • read existing CONTEXT.md when present
  • inspect the epic description
  • determine whether decisions are already locked

If CONTEXT.md already contains the needed locked decisions, verify it and continue toward planning. Do not re-ask settled questions just because the feature is being resumed.

Gray-Area Discovery

Look for uncertainties that would materially change planning or execution, such as:

  • failure behavior
  • edge cases and empty states
  • permissions and visibility
  • migration or compatibility behavior
  • latency or performance expectations
  • out-of-scope boundaries

Keep the exploration concrete and answerable. A good exploration question should be answerable in 1-2 sentences and should change downstream decisions.

Classify the feature domain (SEE, CALL, RUN, READ, or ORGANIZE) using the categories in references/gray-area-probes.md. Each round, review the candidate probes for the relevant category and ask exactly one question — the single most valuable probe for the current state of the conversation. After the user responds, reassess and ask the next most valuable probe if gaps remain. Never batch multiple probes into a single message.

Default-Proposal Pattern

If the user says "I don't know" or "whatever you think":

  1. state the uncertainty plainly
  2. propose one concrete default
  3. explain the consequence in behavioral terms
  4. ask for confirmation before locking it

Lock Decisions Explicitly

As answers emerge, assign stable IDs and confirm them.

Example shape:

  • D1: retry behavior after overnight failure
  • D2: empty-state behavior for first-time users
  • D3: permission rule for non-admin access

Do not treat an answer as locked until it has been explicitly confirmed or accepted as the default.

CONTEXT.md Requirements

Write CONTEXT.md using references/context-template.md. All 8 sections are required. If a section is empty, write N/A.

The goal is not to preserve the original conversation. The goal is to preserve the decisions that planning must trust.

Planning-Readiness Check

Before handoff, confirm all of these are true:

  • every material gray area has been resolved or scoped out
  • a planner could explain the feature using CONTEXT.md
  • no unanswered question would change the high-level plan

If any of these fail, keep exploring.

Self-Review

For Standard and Deep work, run one fresh-eyes self-review pass on the CONTEXT.md draft before handoff.

The reviewer checks:

  • all material gray areas are resolved or explicitly scoped out
  • no locked decisions contradict each other
  • D-IDs are assigned consistently
  • outstanding questions are split correctly between "Resolve Before Planning" and "Deferred to Planning"

Allow at most one retry iteration. If the draft still fails after that retry, flag the unresolved gray areas to the user and ask them to either resolve each flagged item or explicitly mark it as out-of-scope. Do not offer a "proceed anyway" option — the HARD-GATE requiring all material gray areas to be resolved or scoped out still applies.

Quick work is exempt from this self-review step.

Handoff

When exploring is complete:

  1. write CONTEXT.md
  2. update .beads/STATE.json
  3. report how many decisions were locked and what remains out of scope
  4. hand off to beo-planning

Exploring STATE.json uses the canonical 12-field schema from ../reference/references/state-and-handoff-protocol.md (see Example F). Set phase: "exploring", status: "planning-needs-approach", tasks: "none", next: "beo-planning", planning_mode: "unknown", and phase_name to a human-readable feature summary. Exploring does not create execution beads — its deliverable is decision clarity.

Context Budget

Follow ../reference/references/shared-hard-gates.md § Context Budget Protocol. Skill-specific checkpoint items: locked decisions and open questions.

Red Flags & Anti-Patterns

Red flags to catch early:

  • if you find fewer than 2 meaningful gray areas for non-trivial work, verify that you have not skipped edge cases or scope boundaries
  • do not spend excessive time circling a single unresolved question; lock what is known and mark the rest for planning only when the remaining uncertainty is truly planning-shaped
  • do not skip exploring for non-Quick feature work just because the request sounds simple; only work classified as Quick scope by beo-router (via new-quick-intake state) may bypass exploring

Read references/context-template.md when creating or updating CONTEXT.md to ensure correct structure and required fields. Read references/gray-area-probes.md when a user's answer is ambiguous or incomplete and you need targeted follow-up questions.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.97%
按下载量换算55

Claude

29.88%
按下载量换算45

Cursor

20.13%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.91%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills