Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

before-after-story-writer故事作者之前之后

Agent Skill

before-after-story-writer 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,444

周安装

59

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

463
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:before-after-story-writer(故事作者之前之后)
来源仓库:https://github.com/harrylabsj/before-after-story-writer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer

简介

before-after-story-writer 用于补充效率相关能力,支持基于事实的转型前后故事撰写。

  • 适用于企业营销场景,提供道德且非夸张的客户案例叙述模板。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装,命令为 openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer,需用户提供真实数据。
  • 安装前建议确认数据来源权限,避免虚构客户信息造成法律风险。
  • 适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Before After Story Writer

Purpose

This skill writes ethical before/after narratives and case-style stories without fabricating results. It specializes in transformation storytelling that respects truth — using only verified starting points, documented changes, honest timelines, and clear permission status. Built for landing pages, social content, email campaigns, and ads where brands need to show impact without crossing into fake testimonials, exaggerated claims, or misleading imagery.

Triggers

  • "Write a before/after story for this product"
  • "Create a transformation narrative"
  • "Turn customer feedback into a case story"
  • "Write a product journey story"
  • "Draft an ethical before/after for a landing page"
  • "Create a case-study-style story"

Workflow

  1. Evidence verification — Collect the verified starting point (what was the situation before), the documented change (what changed, with evidence), the timeframe, and the permission status (has the person given consent? Is this a real customer or a composite?).
  2. Narrative arc construction — Build a story arc that respects the facts: (a) starting situation with context, (b) the moment of change (what they tried or did differently), (c) the current state with honest description of results, (d) what's still in progress or not claimed. No fabricated drama, no invented quotes.
  3. Draft variants — Create short (social/ads, 50–100 words), medium (landing page, 150–300 words), and long (case study, 400–800 words) versions, each preserving factual accuracy while adapting to format.
  4. Evidence gap identification — Flag every claim that lacks documentation, every timeline that's approximate rather than precise, and every result that varies by individual. Suggest ethical edits — replacing implied guarantees with honest range-of-outcome language.
  5. Disclaimer generation — Write appropriate disclaimers based on content type: "individual results may vary," "this is a real customer who gave permission," "composite story based on typical customer experience," or "results not guaranteed."

Prompt Templates

1. Story Builder (story_build)

Purpose: Build a complete before/after narrative from verified facts.

Input:

  • ${starting_point} — Verified situation before product use (with source)
  • ${change_description} — What changed, with supporting evidence
  • ${timeframe} — How long the change took (exact or approximate)
  • ${permission_status} — Real customer with consent / composite from data / founder story / hypothetical (must not present as real)
  • ${tone} — Inspirational, factual, relatable, or technical
  • ${format} — Short (social), medium (landing page), or long (case study)

Output: Story arc with fact table, narrative draft, disclaimer, and evidence gap flags.

2. Fact-to-Story Mapper (fact_to_story)

Purpose: Turn a dry list of facts/outcomes into a narrative arc without inventing details.

Input:

  • ${facts} — Bulleted list of verified facts and outcomes
  • ${story_angle} — Individual journey, founder story, product creation, or typical customer composite
  • ${permission_status} — Real/composite/founder

Output: Narrative draft that adds only permissible connective tissue — the "how they felt" or "what they thought" is clearly marked as inferred, not stated as fact.

3. Ethical Story Auditor (story_audit)

Purpose: Review an existing before/after story for ethical issues and overclaims.

Input:

  • ${story_draft} — Existing story text
  • ${known_facts} — What's actually verified
  • ${category} — Product category (for risk assessment)

Output: Risk-scored audit: each claim marked as Verified / Inferred (acceptable with labeling) / Overclaimed (needs rewriting) / Fabricated (must remove). Rewriting suggestions for flagged items.

4. Disclaimer Generator (disclaimer_gen)

Purpose: Generate appropriate disclaimers for a before/after story.

Input:

  • ${story_type} — Real individual, composite, founder, or illustrative hypothetical
  • ${category} — Product category
  • ${jurisdiction} — (Optional) target market for regulatory requirements
  • ${claimed_outcomes} — What outcomes does the story describe?

Output: Appropriate disclaimer language for the story type, plus regulatory notes if applicable.

Output Format

## Before/After Story: [Product/Topic]
**Story Type:** [Real / Composite / Founder / Illustrative] | **Permission:** [Status]

### Fact Table
| Aspect | Before | After | Evidence | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Aspect 1] | [State] | [State] | [Source] | High / Medium / Low |
| [Aspect 2] | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Story Arc
- **Starting Situation:** [Context — factual]
- **Moment of Change:** [What happened — factual]
- **Current State:** [Results — factual, with range/disclaimer]
- **Ongoing/Unclaimed:** [What's still in progress or not promised]

### Narrative Draft

**[Format: Short / Medium / Long]**

[Story text. Inferred emotional/experiential elements are marked with ^inferred.
Direct customer quotes are marked as "attributed to [name] with permission" or "representative of customer feedback."
Any result presented as a range uses "typically," "in this case," or "varies by individual."]

### Disclaimer
[Appropriate disclaimer based on story type and category]

### Evidence Gaps & Ethical Edits
- ⚠️ [Claim] — lacks documentation → suggested: [softer framing]
- ✅ [Claim] — verified, kept as-is
- 🛑 [Claim] — unsupportable → removed or rewritten as: [safe alternative]

Safety Rules

  • NEVER fabricate customer stories, screenshots, quotes, photos, results, or timelines — not even "for illustration"
  • NEVER present a composite or hypothetical story as if it were a real individual experience
  • ALWAYS require explicit permission to use a real customer's story — if permission status is unclear, default to "composite" or do not write it
  • NEVER imply guaranteed, typical, or expected results from a single story
  • ALWAYS include appropriate disclaimers, especially for health, fitness, finance, and beauty categories
  • NEVER write before/after stories for high-stakes categories (medical treatments, financial investments, legal outcomes, mental health cures) without extreme caution and appropriate qualified review
  • ALWAYS label inferred emotions, thoughts, or internal experiences as "inferred" or "representative," not as quoted statements

Examples

Example 1: Skincare Product (Real Customer with Permission, Landing Page)

Input: Starting Point="Customer Jamie had dull, uneven skin tone after years of sun exposure (documented via before photo and skincare consult notes)", Change="After 8 weeks of consistent vitamin C serum use, Jamie's skin tone appeared more even and brighter in follow-up photos (dermatologist-reviewed comparison photos available)", Timeframe="8 weeks", Permission="Jamie gave written consent for story and photos, reviewed draft", Format="medium (landing page, 200 words)"

Output: Fact table documenting before/after with evidence confidence ratings. Narrative arc: starting situation (Jamie's dullness concern), the change (what Jamie tried), current state (improvement described honestly, not as "perfect skin"). Disclaimer: "Individual results vary. Jamie is a real customer who gave permission to share her experience." No "erased years of sun damage" or "guaranteed results" language.

Example 2: Kitchen Gadget (Composite Story, Social)

Input: Starting Point="Based on customer feedback: many air fryer users report spending 5–10 minutes scrubbing after each use", Change="Using silicone liners reduced cleanup time to under 1 minute (based on customer survey data, n=200+)", Timeframe="Immediate — first use", Permission="Composite story from aggregated customer feedback — no single individual portrayed", Format="short (social, 80 words)"

Output: Composite story labeled clearly: "Based on what our customers tell us..." Narrative: "Before: scraping and scrubbing your air fryer basket. After: lift out the liner, quick rinse, done." Disclaimer: "Composite story based on aggregated customer feedback. Individual cleanup experience may vary." No fake name, no fabricated quotes, no "life-changing" hyperbole.

Related Skills

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

80.03%
按下载量换算371

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills