Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计未展示

estimationestimation 搜索

Agent Skill

estimation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

367

周安装

15

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

118
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:estimation(estimation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/baxtercooper/nexus
仓库路径:skills/estimation
安装命令:
npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"

简介

estimation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 主要功能是发现并安装 AI 代理的技能。
  • 通过 github 安装,命令为 npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"。
  • 建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

SKILL.md

name
estimation
description
Use before committing to a task. Provides complexity analysis and scope assessment. Invoke when user asks "how complex" or before large features.
version
1.0.0

Estimation Skill

Core Principle: Estimate before committing.

When to Invoke

  • Before starting a large or complex task
  • When user asks about complexity or scope
  • Before providing time commitments
  • When decomposing tasks for orchestration
  • When uncertain about task scope

Complexity Factors

Assess each factor to determine overall complexity:

FactorWeightQuestions to Ask
Files to modifyHighHow many files? How spread across codebase?
New patterns requiredHighDoes this require patterns not in codebase?
External dependenciesHighNew APIs, services, or integrations?
Test coverage neededMediumUnit, integration, e2e tests required?
Documentation updatesLowREADME, API docs, comments needed?
Breaking changesHighWill this break existing functionality?
Unknown territoryHighAre you familiar with this code area?

Complexity Scoring

LOW: 1-2 files, existing patterns, no new dependencies
MEDIUM: 3-5 files, minor new patterns, limited dependencies
HIGH: 6+ files, new patterns, new dependencies, cross-cutting
UNKNOWN: Cannot assess without more exploration

Estimation Protocol

Step 1: Scope Analysis

1. What is the task asking for?
2. What files will likely need changes?
3. What patterns exist for similar features?
4. What dependencies are involved?
5. What testing is required?

Step 2: Factor Assessment

For each complexity factor:

  • Score as: none (0), low (1), medium (2), high (3)
  • Note specific concerns

Step 3: Risk Identification

Risks to identify:
- Areas of uncertainty
- Potential blockers
- Dependencies on external factors
- Technical debt implications

Step 4: Output Estimation

Use the template below.


Output Template

estimation:
  timestamp: [ISO 8601]
  task: |
    [Task description]

  scope:
    files_affected:
      known:
        - [file1.ts - reason]
        - [file2.ts - reason]
      likely:
        - [file3.ts - reason]
      unknown: [count or "cannot determine"]

    changes_required:
      - type: [new_file | modification | deletion]
        description: [what change]
      - type: [type]
        description: [what change]

  complexity:
    overall: [low | medium | high | unknown]
    factors:
      files_to_modify: [0-3]
      new_patterns: [0-3]
      external_dependencies: [0-3]
      test_coverage: [0-3]
      documentation: [0-3]
      breaking_changes: [0-3]
      unknown_territory: [0-3]
    total_score: [sum]

  risks:
    - risk: "[Risk description]"
      likelihood: [low | medium | high]
      impact: [low | medium | high]
      mitigation: "[How to address]"

  unknowns:
    - "[What you couldn't determine]"
    - "[What needs clarification]"

  recommendations:
    approach: |
      [Recommended approach]
    alternatives:
      - "[Alternative approach 1]"
    next_steps:
      - "[First step]"
      - "[Second step]"

  confidence: 0.0
  evidence:
    - "[What you examined]"

Complexity Thresholds

Low Complexity (Score 0-5)

  • Can likely be completed in single session
  • Straightforward implementation
  • Well-understood patterns

Medium Complexity (Score 6-10)

  • May require multiple sessions
  • Some exploration needed
  • Some new patterns required

High Complexity (Score 11+)

  • Definitely requires planning
  • Significant exploration needed
  • Consider breaking into phases

Unknown Complexity

  • Cannot assess without more information
  • Recommend context-gathering first
  • Ask user clarifying questions

Rules

[!CRITICAL] NEVER estimate without understanding scope. ALWAYS include unknowns.

Do

  • List specific files you expect to change
  • Identify risks and unknowns
  • Provide confidence level
  • Recommend next steps

Don't

  • Give point estimates (use ranges/categories)
  • Promise delivery timelines
  • Understate complexity to seem helpful
  • Skip the unknown factors

Integration with Other Skills

After EstimationInvoke
Need more contextcontext-gathering skill
Ready to plan implementationwriting-plans skill
Ready to executeorchestration skill

Chaining Rules

  1. IF unknowns are significant THEN invoke context-gathering first
  2. IF complexity is high THEN recommend phased approach
  3. AFTER estimation accepted THEN proceed to writing-plans

Example

Task: "Add user authentication to the API"

estimation:
  timestamp: "2024-01-15T10:00:00Z"
  task: |
    Add user authentication to the existing Express API

  scope:
    files_affected:
      known:
        - src/routes/auth.ts - new route file
        - src/middleware/auth.ts - new middleware
        - src/models/user.ts - user model changes
      likely:
        - src/routes/index.ts - route registration
        - tests/auth.test.ts - new tests
      unknown: 2-3 additional files for utilities

    changes_required:
      - type: new_file
        description: Authentication routes (login, register, logout)
      - type: new_file
        description: Auth middleware for protected routes
      - type: modification
        description: Add auth to existing protected routes

  complexity:
    overall: medium
    factors:
      files_to_modify: 2
      new_patterns: 2
      external_dependencies: 2
      test_coverage: 2
      documentation: 1
      breaking_changes: 1
      unknown_territory: 1
    total_score: 11

  risks:
    - risk: "Password hashing library choice"
      likelihood: low
      impact: medium
      mitigation: "Use bcrypt, well-established"
    - risk: "JWT secret management"
      likelihood: medium
      impact: high
      mitigation: "Environment variable, document required setup"

  unknowns:
    - "Which routes should be protected?"
    - "OAuth integration needed?"
    - "Session vs JWT preference?"

  recommendations:
    approach: |
      Implement JWT-based auth with bcrypt password hashing.
      Start with login/register, add middleware, then protect routes.
    alternatives:
      - "Session-based auth with express-session"
      - "OAuth with passport.js"
    next_steps:
      - "Clarify auth requirements with user"
      - "Create detailed plan with writing-plans skill"

  confidence: 0.7
  evidence:
    - "Reviewed existing routes structure"
    - "Checked package.json for auth libraries"
    - "Examined similar features in codebase"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

kilo

26.19%
按下载量换算31

windsurf

23.97%
按下载量换算28

cline

16.1%
按下载量换算19

OpenCode

13.9%
按下载量换算16

Codex

8.42%
按下载量换算10

github-copilot

3.85%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills