Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

awt奥特

Agent Skill

awt 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

242

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

79
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:awt(奥特)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill
仓库路径:skills/awt
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt

简介

为 AI 编码工具提供网页浏览与交互能力,支持点击、输入和截图操作。

  • 适用于端到端测试、回归验证和失败日志的根因定位。
  • 通过真实浏览器执行测试,依赖视觉匹配而非稳定 DOM 选择器。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt
  • awt 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

AWT — Eyes and Hands for Your AI Coding Tool

AWT (AI Watch Tester) gives your AI coding tool the ability to see and interact with web applications. Your AI designs the test strategy; AWT executes it with a real browser — clicking, typing, taking screenshots, and reporting back.

When to Use This Skill

  • User wants to test a web application (E2E, QA, regression)
  • User says "test it", "check if it works", "verify the login"
  • User needs to detect bugs after code changes
  • User wants automated regression testing
  • E2E test failed and user wants to find the root cause in source code

When NOT to Use

  • Unit testing or API-only testing (AWT is for UI/E2E)
  • Performance/load testing (use k6, Artillery)
  • Mobile native app testing (web and desktop only)

⛔ CRITICAL RULES — READ BEFORE DOING ANYTHING

  1. NEVER use -y or --auto-approve — the user MUST approve before any test runs.
  2. NEVER use aat devqa — it runs the entire pipeline without user checkpoints. Always use the 4-step workflow below.
  3. NEVER run a test without showing the scenario to the user first and getting explicit approval (e.g. "진행해", "go ahead", "yes", "run it").
  4. NEVER auto-fix code or scenarios without user permission — always report failures and ask the user what to do.
  5. NEVER set headless: true — users MUST see the browser.
  6. NEVER guess element names — always scan first and use real data from scan_result.json.

★ MANDATORY 4-STEP WORKFLOW ★

When the user asks to test anything, you MUST follow these 4 steps in order. Do NOT skip any step. Do NOT combine steps.

STEP 1: SCAN — Analyze the target site

aat scan --url <URL>

After scanning, read .aat/scan_result.json and present a summary to the user:

"I scanned http://localhost:3000 and found 83 interactive elements:
 - 5 input fields (email, password, search, ...)
 - 12 buttons (Login, Sign Up, Submit, ...)
 - 15 links (Home, About, Dashboard, ...)

 Should I create a test scenario based on these elements?"

⏸️ WAIT for user response before proceeding to Step 2.

STEP 2: GENERATE + PRESENT — Create scenario and show it

Write a YAML scenario using the exact data from scan_result.json. Then show the full scenario to the user:

"Here is the test scenario I created (5 steps):

 1. 🌐 Navigate to http://localhost:3000
 2. 🖱  Type 'test@example.com' into email field
 3. 🖱  Type 'password123' into password field
 4. 🖱  Click 'Login' button (critical)
 5. ✅ Verify URL contains '/dashboard'

 Should I run this test? Or would you like me to modify anything?"

⏸️ WAIT for user approval before proceeding to Step 3.

  • If user says "modify X" → edit the scenario and show it again
  • If user says "go ahead" / "진행해" / "yes" → proceed to Step 3
  • If user says "cancel" → stop entirely

STEP 3: EXECUTE — Run the approved scenario

aat run --skill-mode --fast scenarios/<scenario>.yaml

Monitor the output. If any step fails:

  1. STOP immediately — do not continue to the next scenario
  2. Read the failure details from the AWT output
  3. Read the SCREENSHOT if provided in the === AWT SKILL DEVQA === block
  4. Report to the user:
"Test failed at Step 3 (Click Login button):
 - Error: Element 'Login' not found in DOM
 - Possible cause: The button text might be 'Sign In' instead of 'Login'
 - Screenshot: .aat/screenshots/step_003_fail.png

 Should I:
 (a) Fix the scenario (change 'Login' to 'Sign In') and re-test?
 (b) Fix the source code instead?
 (c) Skip this step and continue?"

⏸️ WAIT for user instruction before fixing or re-running.

STEP 4: REPORT — Summarize results

When all steps pass, report to the user:

"✅ Test complete: 5/5 steps passed (37.8 seconds)

 All navigation links and login flow are working correctly."

Auto-Setup

which aat || (pip install aat-devqa && playwright install chromium)

Scenario YAML Reference

Writing Scenarios from scan_result.json

Read .aat/scan_result.json and write YAML using the exact element data:

id: "SC-001"
name: "Login Flow"
steps:
  - step: 1
    action: navigate
    value: "http://localhost:3000/login"
    description: "Go to login page"

  # Use EXACT coordinates/selectors from scan_result.json
  - step: 2
    action: find_and_type
    target:
      selector: "#email"           # from scan_result.json
      text: "Email"
    value: "test@example.com"
    description: "Enter email"

  - step: 3
    action: find_and_click
    target:
      text: "Login"                # from scan_result.json
    region: main                   # exclude nav panel
    critical: true                 # stop if login fails
    description: "Click login button"

  - step: 4
    action: assert_url
    value: "/dashboard"
    on_fail: stop
    message: "Login failed — not redirected to dashboard"
    description: "Verify redirect to dashboard"

Rules:

  • Use selector from scan data when available (most reliable)
  • Use text as fallback (OCR-based)
  • Use region: main for all clicks (avoid nav panel False Positives)
  • Mark login/auth steps as critical: true
  • Add assert_url after navigation-triggering clicks

Actions (21 types)

CategoryActions
Navigationnavigate, go_back, refresh
Find + Mousefind_and_click, find_and_double_click, find_and_right_click
Find + Keyboardfind_and_type, find_and_clear
Directclick_at, type_text (supports verify: true), press_key, key_combo
Assertassert, assert_text, assert_screen_changed, assert_url
Sessionsave_session, load_session
Utilitywait, screenshot, scroll

Key Step Options

- action: find_and_click
  target:
    text: "Submit"               # OCR text
    selector: "#submit-btn"      # CSS selector (highest priority)
  region: main                   # top/bottom/left/right/center/main/full
  critical: true                 # stop test on failure
  on_fail: stop                  # same as critical
  method: auto                   # auto/semantics/template/ocr/vision
  match_index: 0                 # 0=first match, -1=last
  change_threshold: 0.05         # for critical auto-verification
  description: "Click submit"

assert_url (login/navigation verification)

- action: assert_url
  value: "/dashboard"
  on_fail: stop
  message: "Login failed"
  description: "Verify redirect"

Session Reuse

# Save after login
- action: save_session
  name: "my_app_login"

# Load in next run (24h expiry)
- action: load_session
  name: "my_app_login"

Region Parameter

RegionAreaUse When
fullEntire screen (default)General use
mainRight 80%Always use for clicks (avoids nav panel)
topTop 30%Header elements
bottomBottom 30%Footer, floating buttons
centerCentral 60%x60%Modal dialogs

Flutter CanvasKit Support

AWT automatically detects Flutter CanvasKit and activates Semantics:

  1. After navigate, clicks flt-semantics-placeholder (3 retries, 3s each)
  2. Reads flt-semantics[aria-label] for element coordinates
  3. Falls back to OCR if Semantics unavailable

Matching priority on Flutter: CSS selector → Flutter Semantics → Playwright text → OCR → Vision AI

Flutter-specific rules:

  • Always use region: main (Canvas OCR picks up nav text)
  • Use verify: true on type_text (Canvas input may not render)
  • Add assert_screen_changed after clicks
  • Use method: semantics to force Semantics lookup

Source Code Root Cause Analysis

When a test fails, trace to the source code:

  1. Read test output — which step, what error, what URL
  2. Search codebase — grep for the expected text, URL route, component
  3. Read the component — find why it doesn't render/redirect/respond
  4. Propose a fix to the user — show a concrete diff, ask for approval
  5. After user approves — apply fix, re-build, re-scan, re-test

Key principle: NEVER auto-apply fixes. Always show the diff and ask.


CLI Commands

CommandDescription
aat scan --url URLScan page, collect elements to scan_result.json
aat run --skill-mode PATHExecute with structured output for AI
aat run --skill-mode --fast PATHExecute in fast DOM-only mode (Next.js, React, etc.)
aat run --debug PATHExecute with OCR candidate debug logs
aat doctorCheck environment
aat setupConfigure AI + Vision providers
aat validate PATHValidate YAML scenarios
aat costView AI API costs

Key Flags

--skill-mode    Structured output for AI assistants
--fast          DOM-only matching (skip Vision/OCR — fastest for standard web apps)
--debug         Show OCR candidates and matcher details
--strict        Treat skipped steps as failures
--learn         Record healed steps for pattern learning
--slow-mo N     Slow down actions by N ms

⛔ Banned Flags (NEVER use these)

-y / --auto-approve    Bypasses user approval — NEVER USE

Best Practices

  1. Always scan before writing scenarios — never guess element names
  2. Use region: main on all find_and_click — prevents nav panel False Positives
  3. Mark auth steps critical: true — no point testing after login fails
  4. Add assert_url after form submits — verify navigation happened
  5. Use save_session/load_session — skip login on repeated runs
  6. Read screenshots on failure — the SCREENSHOT path is a real PNG file
  7. One fix per retry — change only the failing step
  8. Always ask user before fixing — never auto-modify code or scenarios

AI Providers (for Vision AI Tier 3)

ProviderVisionCostSetup
Gemini FlashYesFreeaat setup → Gemini
ClaudeYesMediumaat setup → Claude
GPT-4oYesHigheraat setup → OpenAI

Vision AI is optional — Tier 1 (template) + Tier 2 (OCR) are free and work without API keys.

Reference Files

  • references/scenario-schema.md — Full YAML schema
  • references/cli-reference.md — Complete CLI reference
  • references/config-reference.md — All configuration options
  • templates/scenario-template.yaml — Blank scenario template
  • templates/config-template.yaml — Default config template

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.48%
按下载量换算26

Claude

31.56%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

10.16%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills