Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

autoresearch-pro自动研究专业版

Agent Skill

autoresearch-pro 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,920

周安装

165

GitHub Stars

2

下载量

1,373
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:autoresearch-pro(自动研究专业版)
来源仓库:https://github.com/0xcjl/autoresearch-pro
安装命令:
openclaw skills install autoresearch-pro
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install autoresearch-pro

简介

通过突变测试循环提升技能提示与文章质量。

  • 采用 Karpathy 范式实现自动化内容迭代。
  • 特别适合文本生成类任务的持续改进。autoresearch-pro 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install autoresearch-pro。
  • 需设定明确的评分规则与最大迭代次数限制。

SKILL.md

name
autoresearch-pro
description
Automatically improve OpenClaw skills, prompts, or articles through iterative mutation-testing loops. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. Use when user says 'optimize [skill]', 'autoresearch [skill]', 'improve my skill', 'optimize this prompt', 'improve my prompt', 'polish this article', 'improve this article', or explicitly requests quality improvement for any text-based content. Supports three modes: skill (SKILL.md files), prompt (any prompt text), and article (any document).

autoresearch-pro

Overview

Automatically improve any OpenClaw skill, prompt, or article through iterative mutation-testing: small edits → run test cases → score with checklist → keep improvements, discard regressions.

Inspired by Karpathy/autoresearch.

Supports three optimization modes:

ModeInputOutput
SkillPath to a skill directoryImproved SKILL.md
PromptA prompt text stringImproved prompt
ArticleAn article/document textImproved article

Workflow

Step 1 — Identify Mode and Input

Ask the user to confirm:

  • Mode 1 — Skill: User says "optimize [skill-name]" or provides a skill path
  • Mode 2 — Prompt: User says "optimize this prompt" or pastes a prompt
  • Mode 3 — Article: User says "improve this article" or pastes article text

For Skill mode, resolve the skill path to ~/.openclaw/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md. For Prompt/Article mode, keep the text in context (do not write to disk unless needed).

Step 2 — Generate Checklist (10 Questions)

Read the target content first. Then generate 10 diverse, specific yes/no checklist questions relevant to the content type:

For Skill mode (same as before):

#DimensionWhat to Check
1Description clarityIs the frontmatter description precise and actionable?
2Trigger coverageDoes it cover the main real-world use cases?
3Workflow structureAre steps clearly sequenced and unambiguous?
4Error guidanceDoes it handle error states and edge cases?
5Tool usage accuracyAre tool names and parameters correct for OpenClaw?
6Example qualityDo examples reflect real usage patterns?
7ConcisenessIs content free of redundant repetition?
8Freedom calibrationIs instruction specificity appropriate?
9Reference qualityAre references and links accurate?
10CompletenessAre all sections filled with real content?

For Prompt mode (10 tailored questions):

#DimensionWhat to Check
1Goal clarityDoes the prompt state a clear, specific goal?
2Role/toneIs the desired role or tone specified?
3Input formatIs the input format clearly described?
4Output formatIs the expected output format specified?
5ConstraintsAre key constraints and boundaries stated?
6Context sufficiencyIs enough context provided to avoid hallucination?
7Edge casesDoes it handle ambiguous or edge case inputs?
8ConcisenessIs it free of redundant or contradictory instructions?
9ActionabilityAre instructions concrete and actionable vs. vague?
10CompletenessAre all necessary elements for the task present?

For Article mode (10 tailored questions):

#DimensionWhat to Check
1Title qualityDoes the title clearly convey the main value?
2Opening hookDoes the opening grab attention and set expectations?
3Logical structureAre ideas logically organized (not random)?
4Argument clarityAre claims supported with evidence or reasoning?
5ConcisenessIs unnecessary padding or repetition removed?
6Transition flowDo paragraphs/sections flow smoothly?
7Closing strengthDoes the conclusion summarize and inspire action?
8Tone consistencyIs the tone consistent throughout?
9ReadabilityIs sentence/paragraph length varied appropriately?
10Audience matchDoes language match the target audience level?

Present the 10 questions, numbered 1-10. Ask the user to select which ones to activate (e.g., "use questions 1, 3, 5, 7"). Default: use all 10 if user doesn't specify.

Step 3 — Prepare Test Cases

  • Skill mode: Generate 3-5 realistic prompts a user would send when using the skill
  • Prompt mode: Generate 3-5 test inputs that the prompt would process
  • Article mode: Generate 3-5 ways the article might be read or consumed

Store test cases in context — do not write to disk.

Step 4 — Run Autoresearch Loop

Loop configuration:

  • Rounds per batch: 30
  • Max total rounds: 100
  • Pause: After every 30 rounds, show summary and ask user to continue or stop
  • Stop conditions: User says stop, OR 100 rounds completed

Per-round procedure:

  1. Mutate: Make ONE small edit to the target content:

- Skill mode: edit SKILL.md - Prompt mode: edit the prompt string - Article mode: edit the article text

  1. Test: For each test case, simulate what output the content would produce.
  1. Score: Apply each active checklist question (0 or 1 per question). Score = (passed / total) × 100.
  1. Decide: If new score ≥ best score → keep the mutation. If lower → revert.
  1. Log: Round number, mutation type, score, keep/revert decision.

Mutation types (pick one per round):

TypeDescription
AAdd a constraint rule
BStrengthen trigger/coverage
CAdd a concrete example
DTighten vague language
EImprove error/edge case handling
FRemove redundant content
GImprove transitions
HExpand a thin section
IAdd cross-reference
JAdjust degree-of-freedom

Step 5 — Report Results

After each batch (30 rounds):

Batch N (rounds X-Y):
  Best score: XX%
  Mutations kept: N  |  Reverted: N
  Most effective types: [list top 2-3]
Accumulated improvements: [summary]
Continue? (yes/stop)

After full completion:

  • Original score vs. final score
  • Top 3 most impactful mutations
  • Final improved content (inline or diff)
  • File path (skill mode only)

Mutation Strategy Reference

High-impact, low-risk changes:

  • Adding explicit constraints where the content is vague
  • Expanding coverage to cover edge cases
  • Adding concrete examples to abstract instructions
  • Tightening soft language ("try to" → "must")

Avoid in one round:

  • Large rewrites of entire sections
  • Multiple unrelated changes at once
  • Changing fundamental scope or purpose

See references/mutation_strategies.md for the full strategy guide.


Mode Selection Quick Reference

User saysMode
"optimize [skill]" / "autoresearch [skill]"Skill
"optimize this prompt" / "improve my prompt"Prompt
"polish this article" / "improve this article"Article
"optimize this document"Article

Default to Prompt mode if the input is a text string without a skill path.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.43%
按下载量换算1,091

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills