Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

argocd-deployment-analyzerargocd 部署分析器

Agent Skill

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器、基础设施和运维自动化任务。它适合让 Agent 检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态、生成排障思路或辅助云服务接入。使用时需要明确目标环境、账号权限、区域和资源组,区分本地测试与生产操作;涉及删除资源、重启服务、修改网络或权限配置时,应先确认影响范围。

总安装

832

周安装

34

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

267
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:argocd-deployment-analyzer(argocd 部署分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charlie-morrison/argocd-deployment-analyzer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install argocd-deployment-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install argocd-deployment-analyzer

简介

分析 ArgoCD 应用程序同步状态、检测配置偏差、查看安全清单和最佳实践,以及诊断同步故障。

SKILL.md

name
argocd-deployment-analyzer
description
Analyze ArgoCD application sync status, detect configuration drift, review manifests for security and best practices, and diagnose sync failures.
metadata
tags
["argocd", "gitops", "kubernetes", "deployment", "drift-detection", "sync", "devops", "cd"]

ArgoCD Deployment Analyzer

Deep-dive analysis of ArgoCD-managed applications — detect sync drift, diagnose failed syncs, audit manifest security, review sync policies, and validate ArgoCD configurations against production best practices. Turns ArgoCD operational noise into actionable findings.

Use when: "analyze argocd apps", "why is my argocd app out of sync", "review argocd config", "audit gitops deployments", "diagnose sync failure", or when ArgoCD applications are degraded, drifting, or misconfigured.

Prerequisites

The agent checks for access to ArgoCD:

# CLI access
argocd version --client

# Logged in
argocd account get-user-info

# Or: kubectl access to ArgoCD namespace
kubectl get applications.argoproj.io -n argocd

# Or: ArgoCD API access
curl -s https://argocd.example.com/api/v1/applications \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ARGOCD_TOKEN" | jq '.items | length'

Usage

Provide one or more of:

  • Application name — specific ArgoCD app to analyze (e.g., production/api-server)
  • Project name — analyze all apps in an ArgoCD project
  • Scopeall to analyze every application
  • Focus areasync, security, health, drift, config, or all

Example invocations:

Analyze why the payments-service ArgoCD app keeps going OutOfSync.
Security audit all ArgoCD applications in the production project.
Review our ArgoCD ApplicationSet configurations for best practices.

How It Works

Step 1: Application Inventory

Gather the full picture of all ArgoCD-managed applications:

# List all applications with status
argocd app list -o json | jq '[.[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  project: .spec.project,
  syncStatus: .status.sync.status,
  healthStatus: .status.health.status,
  repo: .spec.source.repoURL,
  path: .spec.source.path,
  targetRevision: .spec.source.targetRevision,
  destination: .spec.destination.server,
  namespace: .spec.destination.namespace,
  syncPolicy: .spec.syncPolicy
}]'

# Or via kubectl
kubectl get applications.argoproj.io -n argocd -o json | jq '[.items[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  sync: .status.sync.status,
  health: .status.health.status
}]'

Classify applications into categories:

  • Healthy + Synced — no action needed
  • Healthy + OutOfSync — drift detected, needs investigation
  • Degraded — health check failing
  • Progressing — sync in progress, check if stuck
  • Missing — target resources don't exist
  • Unknown — ArgoCD can't determine state

Step 2: Sync Drift Analysis

For each OutOfSync application, identify what drifted and why:

# Get the diff between live and desired state
argocd app diff <app-name> --local-repo-root /path/to/repo

# Detailed sync status with resource-level breakdown
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '{
  syncStatus: .status.sync.status,
  revision: .status.sync.revision,
  comparedTo: .status.sync.comparedTo,
  resources: [.status.resources[] | select(.status != "Synced") | {
    kind: .kind,
    name: .name,
    namespace: .namespace,
    status: .status,
    health: .health.status,
    message: .health.message
  }]
}'

# Check sync history for patterns
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '[.status.history[] | {
  revision: .revision[:8],
  deployedAt: .deployedAt,
  source: .source.path
}]'

Common drift causes the agent checks:

  1. Manual kubectl edits — someone modified a resource directly, bypassing GitOps
  2. Mutating webhooks — admission controllers injecting sidecars, labels, or annotations
  3. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler — HPA changes replica count, conflicts with Git-declared replicas
  4. Controller-managed fields — Kubernetes controllers (e.g., EndpointSlice controller) update fields
  5. CRD defaults — CRD defaulting webhooks adding fields not in the Git source
  6. Helm value drift — values.yaml in Git doesn't match what was rendered

Step 3: Sync Failure Diagnosis

When sync operations fail, diagnose the root cause:

# Get sync operation result
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '.status.operationState | {
  phase: .phase,
  message: .message,
  startedAt: .startedAt,
  finishedAt: .finishedAt,
  syncResult: .syncResult.resources | map(select(.status != "Synced"))
}'

# Check for resource-level errors
argocd app resources <app-name> --orphaned

# Check events on the target namespace
kubectl get events -n <namespace> --sort-by='.lastTimestamp' | tail -20

Failure categories the agent identifies:

CategorySymptomsTypical Fix
RBACforbidden errors in syncFix ArgoCD service account permissions
Schema validationvalidation failedFix manifest against CRD/API schema
Namespace missingnamespace not foundCreate namespace or enable auto-create
Resource conflictalready existsCheck for duplicate resource management
Quota exceededexceeded quotaRequest quota increase or reduce resource requests
Immutable fieldfield is immutableDelete and recreate the resource
Dependency orderresource X not foundAdd sync waves or sync ordering
Timeoutdeadline exceededIncrease sync timeout or fix health check

Step 4: Health Check Analysis

Evaluate application health and identify degraded components:

# Health of each resource in the app
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '[.status.resources[] | {
  kind: .kind,
  name: .name,
  health: .health.status,
  message: .health.message
}] | group_by(.health) | map({status: .[0].health, count: length, resources: map(.name)})'

# Pod-level issues for Degraded deployments
kubectl get pods -n <namespace> -l app=<app-label> -o json | jq '[.items[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  phase: .status.phase,
  ready: ([.status.conditions[] | select(.type=="Ready")] | .[0].status),
  restarts: ([.status.containerStatuses[].restartCount] | add),
  waiting: [.status.containerStatuses[] | select(.state.waiting) | .state.waiting.reason]
}]'

Step 5: Configuration Audit

Review ArgoCD Application and Project configurations for security and best practices:

Sync policy analysis:

# Check for dangerous sync policies
argocd app list -o json | jq '[.[] | select(
  .spec.syncPolicy.automated.prune == true and
  .spec.syncPolicy.automated.selfHeal == true
) | {name: .metadata.name, warning: "auto-prune + self-heal enabled"}]'

Checks performed:

  • Auto-sync without prune protection — accidental resource deletion risk
  • Self-heal on production — could mask legitimate manual hotfixes
  • Missing sync windows — production should have maintenance windows
  • No retry policy — transient failures won't self-recover
  • Wildcard project destinations* server or namespace defeats RBAC
  • No resource whitelist/blacklist — project can deploy any resource type
  • Plaintext secrets in Git — secrets not managed by Sealed Secrets / SOPS / ESO
  • Missing ignoreDifferences — known benign drift causing noise
  • No notification triggers — sync failures go unnoticed
  • Orphaned resources — resources in the namespace not managed by any app

Step 6: Security Review

Audit manifests managed by ArgoCD applications for security issues:

# Extract rendered manifests
argocd app manifests <app-name> --source live > /tmp/live-manifests.yaml
argocd app manifests <app-name> --source git > /tmp/git-manifests.yaml

Security checks:

  • Containers running as root or with privileged: true
  • Missing SecurityContext, readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot
  • Missing resource limits (CPU/memory) — noisy neighbor risk
  • hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC enabled
  • ServiceAccount token auto-mounting when not needed
  • Missing NetworkPolicies
  • Images using :latest tag or no tag
  • Secrets mounted as environment variables instead of files
  • Missing PodDisruptionBudgets for critical services

Step 7: ApplicationSet Analysis

If ApplicationSets are used, validate their generators and templates:

kubectl get applicationsets -n argocd -o json | jq '[.items[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  generators: [.spec.generators[] | keys[0]],
  template: .spec.template.spec.source.repoURL,
  syncPolicy: .spec.template.spec.syncPolicy
}]'

Checks:

  • Git generator with overly broad directory patterns
  • Missing preserveResourcesOnDeletion (deleting the AppSet deletes all apps)
  • Cluster generator without label selectors (deploys to ALL clusters)
  • Template overrides that bypass project restrictions
  • No goTemplate validation (template injection risk)

Output

The agent produces a structured report:

  1. Dashboard summary — total apps, sync status distribution, health distribution
  2. Drift report — each OutOfSync app with specific resources and fields that drifted, with root cause
  3. Failure diagnosis — for each failed sync: root cause, specific error, and remediation steps
  4. Health issues — degraded resources with pod-level diagnostics
  5. Configuration findings — ranked by severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) with fix recommendations
  6. Security findings — manifest-level security issues with remediation
  7. Recommended ignoreDifferences — for known benign drift patterns (HPA replicas, annotation mutations, etc.)
  8. Action items — prioritized list of changes to make, with example YAML patches

Common Remediation Patterns

HPA replica drift:

spec:
  ignoreDifferences:
    - group: apps
      kind: Deployment
      jsonPointers:
        - /spec/replicas

Mutating webhook annotations:

spec:
  ignoreDifferences:
    - group: ""
      kind: Service
      jqPathExpressions:
        - .metadata.annotations["webhook.example.com/injected"]

Sync wave ordering for dependencies: Use argocd.argoproj.io/sync-wave annotations: -1 for namespaces, 0 for ConfigMaps/Secrets, 1 for Deployments/Services.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

76.61%
按下载量换算205

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills