Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

api-contract-designAPI contract 设计

Agent Skill

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

总安装

282

周安装

12

GitHub Stars

265

下载量

99
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-contract-design(API contract 设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup
仓库路径:skills/api-contract-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill api-contract-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill api-contract-design

简介

提供 REST、GraphQL 及混合 API 的设计指导,强调一致性、可发现性与可维护性。

  • 适用于从零开始设计新 API 或审查现有合约,涵盖版本控制与安全流设计。
  • 使用时需评估技术选型与团队熟悉度,优先采用标准化规范而非实验性方案。
  • 安装方式:通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 仓库安装,支持主流 AI 编程工具。
  • 注意:设计决策应记录于文档,便于后续迭代与新人理解。

SKILL.md

API Design Patterns

A comprehensive skill for designing, documenting, and implementing APIs that developers love to use. Covers REST, GraphQL, and hybrid approaches with emphasis on consistency, discoverability, and maintainability.

When to Use

  • Designing new REST or GraphQL APIs from scratch
  • Reviewing existing API contracts for consistency and best practices
  • Evaluating API technologies and frameworks
  • Implementing API versioning strategies
  • Designing authentication and authorization flows
  • Creating OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
  • Building developer-friendly API documentation

Core Principles

1. Contract-First Design

Define the API contract before implementation. This enables parallel development, clearer communication, and better documentation.

DESIGN SEQUENCE:
1. IDENTIFY use cases and consumer needs
2. MODEL resources and their relationships
3. DEFINE operations (CRUD + custom actions)
4. SPECIFY request/response schemas
5. DOCUMENT error scenarios
6. VALIDATE with consumers before implementing

2. Consistency Over Cleverness

APIs should be predictable. Developers should be able to guess how an endpoint works based on patterns established elsewhere in the API.

CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST:
- Naming conventions (plural nouns, kebab-case)
- Response envelope structure
- Error format across all endpoints
- Pagination approach
- Query parameter patterns
- Date/time formatting (ISO 8601)

3. Design for Evolution

APIs must evolve without breaking existing consumers. Plan for change from day one.

EVOLUTION STRATEGIES:
- Additive changes only (new fields, endpoints)
- Deprecation with sunset periods
- Version negotiation (headers, URL paths)
- Backward compatibility testing

REST API Patterns

Resource Modeling

Resources represent business entities. URLs should reflect the resource hierarchy.

GOOD:
GET    /users                    # List users
POST   /users                    # Create user
GET    /users/{id}               # Get user
PATCH  /users/{id}               # Partial update
DELETE /users/{id}               # Delete user
GET    /users/{id}/orders        # User's orders (sub-resource)

AVOID:
GET    /getUsers                 # Verbs in URLs
POST   /createNewUser            # Redundant verbs
GET    /user-list                # Inconsistent naming
POST   /users/{id}/delete        # Wrong HTTP method

HTTP Method Semantics

MethodUsageIdempotentSafe
GETRetrieve resource(s)YesYes
POSTCreate resource, trigger actionNoNo
PUTReplace entire resourceYesNo
PATCHPartial updateYesNo
DELETERemove resourceYesNo
OPTIONSCORS preflight, capability discoveryYesYes

Status Code Selection

SUCCESS:
200 OK           - Successful GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE
201 Created      - Successful POST (include Location header)
202 Accepted     - Async operation started
204 No Content   - Success with no response body

CLIENT ERRORS:
400 Bad Request  - Malformed request, validation failure
401 Unauthorized - Missing or invalid authentication
403 Forbidden    - Authenticated but not authorized
404 Not Found    - Resource doesn't exist
409 Conflict     - State conflict (duplicate, version mismatch)
422 Unprocessable- Semantically invalid (business rule violation)
429 Too Many     - Rate limit exceeded

SERVER ERRORS:
500 Internal     - Unexpected server error
502 Bad Gateway  - Upstream service failure
503 Unavailable  - Temporary overload or maintenance
504 Gateway Timeout - Upstream timeout

Error Response Format

Standardize error responses across all endpoints:

{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
    "message": "Request validation failed",
    "details": [
      {
        "field": "email",
        "code": "INVALID_FORMAT",
        "message": "Email must be a valid email address"
      }
    ],
    "requestId": "req_abc123",
    "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z",
    "documentation": "https://api.example.com/docs/errors#VALIDATION_ERROR"
  }
}

Pagination Patterns

Offset-Based (Simple, not for large datasets)

GET /users?offset=20&limit=10

Response:
{
  "data": [...],
  "pagination": {
    "total": 150,
    "offset": 20,
    "limit": 10,
    "hasMore": true
  }
}

Cursor-Based (Recommended for large datasets)

GET /users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTAwfQ&limit=10

Response:
{
  "data": [...],
  "pagination": {
    "nextCursor": "eyJpZCI6MTEwfQ",
    "prevCursor": "eyJpZCI6OTB9",
    "hasMore": true
  }
}

Filtering and Sorting

FILTERING:
GET /users?status=active                    # Exact match
GET /users?created_after=2025-01-01         # Date range
GET /users?role=admin,moderator             # Multiple values
GET /users?search=john                      # Full-text search

SORTING:
GET /users?sort=created_at                  # Ascending (default)
GET /users?sort=-created_at                 # Descending (prefix -)
GET /users?sort=status,-created_at          # Multiple fields

FIELD SELECTION:
GET /users?fields=id,name,email             # Sparse fieldsets
GET /users?expand=organization              # Include related

GraphQL Patterns

Schema Design Principles

# Use clear, descriptive type names
type User {
  id: ID!
  email: String!
  displayName: String!
  createdAt: DateTime!

  # Relationships with clear naming
  organization: Organization
  orders(first: Int, after: String): OrderConnection!
}

# Use connections for paginated lists
type OrderConnection {
  edges: [OrderEdge!]!
  pageInfo: PageInfo!
  totalCount: Int!
}

type OrderEdge {
  node: Order!
  cursor: String!
}

type PageInfo {
  hasNextPage: Boolean!
  hasPreviousPage: Boolean!
  startCursor: String
  endCursor: String
}

Query Design

type Query {
  # Single resource by ID
  user(id: ID!): User

  # List with filtering and pagination
  users(
    filter: UserFilter
    first: Int
    after: String
    orderBy: UserOrderBy
  ): UserConnection!

  # Viewer pattern for current user
  viewer: User
}

input UserFilter {
  status: UserStatus
  organizationId: ID
  searchQuery: String
}

enum UserOrderBy {
  CREATED_AT_ASC
  CREATED_AT_DESC
  NAME_ASC
  NAME_DESC
}

Mutation Design

type Mutation {
  # Use input types for complex mutations
  createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload!
  updateUser(input: UpdateUserInput!): UpdateUserPayload!
  deleteUser(id: ID!): DeleteUserPayload!
}

input CreateUserInput {
  email: String!
  displayName: String!
  organizationId: ID
}

# Payload types for consistent responses
type CreateUserPayload {
  user: User
  errors: [UserError!]!
}

type UserError {
  field: String
  code: String!
  message: String!
}

N+1 Query Prevention

STRATEGIES:
1. DataLoader pattern for batching
2. Query complexity analysis and limits
3. Depth limiting
4. Field-level cost calculation
5. Persisted queries for production

API Versioning Strategies

URL Path Versioning

GET /v1/users
GET /v2/users

PROS:
- Explicit and visible
- Easy to route in infrastructure
- Clear in logs and monitoring

CONS:
- URL pollution
- Harder to deprecate gracefully

Header Versioning

GET /users
Accept: application/vnd.api+json; version=2

PROS:
- Clean URLs
- Content negotiation friendly
- Easier partial versioning

CONS:
- Less visible
- Harder to test in browser

Query Parameter Versioning

GET /users?api-version=2025-01-15

PROS:
- Easy to test
- Visible in URLs
- Date-based versions are intuitive

CONS:
- Clutters query strings
- Easy to forget

Recommended: Dual Approach

1. Major versions in URL path: /v1/, /v2/
2. Minor versions via header: API-Version: 2025-01-15
3. Default to latest minor within major
4. Sunset headers for deprecation warnings

Authentication Patterns

API Keys

USAGE: Server-to-server, rate limiting, analytics
TRANSPORT: Header (Authorization: ApiKey xxx) or query param

SECURITY:
- Rotate keys regularly
- Different keys for environments
- Scope keys to specific operations
- Never expose in client-side code

OAuth 2.0 / OIDC

FLOWS:
- Authorization Code + PKCE: Web apps, mobile apps
- Client Credentials: Server-to-server
- Device Code: CLI tools, smart TVs

TOKEN HANDLING:
- Short-lived access tokens (15-60 min)
- Refresh tokens for session extension
- Token introspection for validation
- Token revocation endpoint

JWT Best Practices

CLAIMS:
{
  "iss": "https://auth.example.com",
  "sub": "user_123",
  "aud": "api.example.com",
  "exp": 1705320000,
  "iat": 1705316400,
  "scope": "read:users write:users"
}

SECURITY:
- Use asymmetric keys (RS256, ES256)
- Validate all claims
- Check token expiration
- Verify audience matches
- Keep tokens stateless when possible

OpenAPI/Swagger Patterns

Specification Structure

openapi: 3.1.0
info:
  title: Example API
  version: 1.0.0
  description: API description with markdown support
  contact:
    name: API Support
    url: https://example.com/support

servers:
  - url: https://api.example.com/v1
    description: Production
  - url: https://api.staging.example.com/v1
    description: Staging

security:
  - bearerAuth: []

paths:
  /users:
    get:
      operationId: listUsers
      summary: List all users
      tags: [Users]
      # ... operation details

components:
  schemas:
    User:
      type: object
      required: [id, email]
      properties:
        id:
          type: string
          format: uuid
        email:
          type: string
          format: email

Reusable Components

components:
  schemas:
    # Reusable pagination
    PaginationMeta:
      type: object
      properties:
        total:
          type: integer
        page:
          type: integer
        perPage:
          type: integer

    # Reusable error
    Error:
      type: object
      required: [code, message]
      properties:
        code:
          type: string
        message:
          type: string

  parameters:
    # Reusable query params
    PageParam:
      name: page
      in: query
      schema:
        type: integer
        default: 1
        minimum: 1

  responses:
    # Reusable responses
    NotFound:
      description: Resource not found
      content:
        application/json:
          schema:
            $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'

Best Practices

Do

  • Design APIs for consumers, not implementation convenience
  • Use meaningful HTTP status codes
  • Provide idempotency keys for non-idempotent operations
  • Include rate limit headers (X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining)
  • Return Location header for created resources
  • Support CORS properly for browser clients
  • Document all error codes with resolution steps
  • Version your API from day one
  • Use HTTPS exclusively
  • Implement request validation with clear error messages

Avoid

  • Exposing internal implementation details (database IDs, stack traces)
  • Breaking changes without versioning
  • Inconsistent naming across endpoints
  • Deeply nested URLs (more than 2 levels)
  • Using GET for operations with side effects
  • Returning different structures for success/error
  • Ignoring backward compatibility
  • Over-fetching in GraphQL without limits
  • Authentication via query parameters (except OAuth callbacks)
  • Mixing REST and RPC styles in the same API

References

  • templates/rest-api-template.md - REST API specification template
  • templates/graphql-schema-template.md - GraphQL schema template

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.32%
按下载量换算30

OpenCode

22.88%
按下载量换算23

windsurf

18.9%
按下载量换算19

Codex

13.29%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.27%
按下载量换算8

trae

3.91%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills