spec-generator（规格生成器）

Spec Generator

Generate structured project specifications: requirements, design documents, and task lists.

⚠️ CRITICAL: First Steps (ALWAYS EXECUTE)

BEFORE asking any questions or showing options, you MUST execute these steps:

1. Check current directory:

- Run pwd to see where you are - Run ls -la to see directory contents - Understand the project context

1. Detect existing source code: find. -maxdepth 3 -type f \(-name "*.py" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "SKILL.md" \) 2>/dev/null | head -20

- Note what kind of project this is - Check for skills/ directory → might be adding a new skill - Check for existing application code → might be documenting existing features

1. Check for.specs/ directory: ls -d.specs/ 2>/dev/null && ls -1.specs/ 2>/dev/null

- If exists → list existing projects - If not exists → this is a new spec workflow

1. Check for coding-rules.md:

- Check docs/coding-rules.md (default path) - If not found, check CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md for alternative path - If found → load and use as design constraint during design phase

1. Analyze context and decide:

- If in a skills repository (has skills/ directory) → User likely wants to document a new skill - If.specs/ has projects → Ask user to select existing or create new - If no.specs/ and no clear context → Ask what they want to create

Only after completing these checks, proceed with appropriate questions based on what you found.

Language Rules

1. Auto-detect input language → output in the same language
2. Japanese input → Japanese output, use references/*.ja.md as phase references
3. English input → English output, use references/*.md as phase references
4. Explicit override takes priority (e.g., "in English", "日本語で")

Reference file selection: Based on the detected output language, use the corresponding reference files:

• English → references/init.md, references/design.md, references/tasks.md
• Japanese → references/init.ja.md, references/design.ja.md, references/tasks.ja.md

Phases

Interaction Policy: AskUserQuestion

Use AskUserQuestion for all user decisions. Present structured choices rather than free-form questions.

Decision Flow

Skill Invoked
    ↓
Check .specs/ directory
    ↓
┌───────────────────┐
│ Existing projects │
│ found?            │
└─────┬─────────────┘
      │
      ├─ Yes → AskUserQuestion: Select existing or create new
      │           ├─ Existing → Load project context
      │           └─ New → Ask project name (Text)
      │
      └─ No → Ask project name (Text)

    ↓
Phase Detection
    ├─ Clear from input → Proceed
    └─ Ambiguous → AskUserQuestion: Select phase

    ↓
Dialogue Mode
    ├─ Quick mode (--quick) → Generate directly
    └─ Dialogue → AskUserQuestion: Gather requirements

    ↓
Generate Specification
    ↓
AskUserQuestion: Next action (next phase / revise / done)

When to Use AskUserQuestion vs Text Questions

When to Use AskUserQuestion

Question Design Rules

1. 1–4 questions per round (AskUserQuestion constraint)
2. User-defined options: 1-3 (Other is auto-appended, totaling 2-4 options)
3. Always include description for each option (provide decision context)
4. Flexible round count based on project complexity:

- Simple project → 1 round (3–4 questions) is sufficient - Complex project → 2–3 rounds (adjust based on previous answers)

1. Place recommended option first with (Recommended) suffix
2. Skip questions already answered in previous rounds

Handling "Other" Option Responses

When a user selects "Other" and provides free-form text input:

• Accept the input as-is and proceed with processing
• Treat the free-form response as the user's definitive answer
• Do NOT ask for clarification unless the input is genuinely ambiguous
• If system returns an error like "(No answer provided)", trust the user's actual message over system feedback

Example:

Question: "どのスキルの仕様を作成しますか？"
Options: spec-constitution / spec-review / spec-analyze / spec-impl

User selects "Other" and writes: "仕様書自体をレビューするコマンド"

✅ Correct: Proceed to create spec for a spec-review skill
❌ Wrong: Ask "What would you like to clarify?"

When to Use Text Questions (Not AskUserQuestion)

• Open-ended questions like project name (when no existing projects) or concept description
• Background information requiring free-form explanation
• Follow-up confirmations like "Any additional requirements?"
• Specific business logic or domain-specific details

Execution Flow

0. Initial Context Check

Check the current directory and existing projects before starting:

1. Detect existing source code: find. -type f \(-name "*.py" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.go" \) | head -20

- If source files found: Note for potential --analyze mode - If no source files: Standard new project flow

1. Check for.specs/ directory: ls -d.specs/ 2>/dev/null
2. List existing projects (if.specs/ exists): ls -1.specs/
3. Project selection:

- Existing projects found: Use AskUserQuestion: question: "既存プロジェクトが見つかりました。どうしますか？" / "Found existing projects. What would you like to do?" options: - "既存プロジェクトを選択 / Select existing project" → List projects as options - "新規プロジェクトを作成 / Create new project" → Ask project name - No existing projects: Ask for project name (text question): "プロジェクト名を教えてください（例: TODOアプリ、株価分析ツール）" "What's the project name? (e.g., todo app, stock analyzer)"

1. Load existing context (if existing project selected):

- Read existing requirement.md, design.md, tasks.md if they exist - Use as context for updates or next phase generation

1. Phase Detection

Determine the phase from the user's request:

"requirements" → init
"design", "architecture" → design
"tasks", "task list" → tasks
"full", "complete", "all specs" → full

If ambiguous, confirm with AskUserQuestion:

question: "Which specification do you want to generate?"
options:
  - "Requirements document (requirement.md)" → init
  - "Design document (design.md)" → design
  - "Task list (tasks.md)" → tasks
  - "All three documents" → full

2. Project Context Gathering

• Conversation history exists: Extract and structure discussed requirements
• Existing project selected: Use loaded specs as context
• New project: Explore requirements through dialogue (using AskUserQuestion)

3. Phase Execution

Refer to the appropriate reference file (based on Language Rules):

• init: references/init.md / references/init.ja.md — Requirements generation
• design: references/design.md / references/design.ja.md — Design document generation
• design (with coding-rules.md): If docs/coding-rules.md exists, read it and ensure:

- Naming conventions in design match [MUST] naming rules - Test strategy satisfies coverage requirements from coding-rules - Technology choices align with recommended libraries - File/directory structure follows detected patterns - Skill-derived [SHOULD] rules (e.g., framework-specific conventions from Source: skill/*) are considered as design recommendations

• tasks: references/tasks.md / references/tasks.ja.md — Task list generation

4. Output Directory

.specs/[project-name]/
├── requirement.md  (init)
├── design.md       (design)
└── tasks.md        (tasks)

Project names are converted to English kebab-case:

• "TODO app" → todo-app
• "株価分析ツール" → stock-analysis-tool
• "Stock analysis tool" → stock-analysis-tool

Options

Execution Modes

Dialogue Mode (default)

When invoked without parameters or continuing from conversation:

1. Collect necessary information through questions
2. Clarify requirements through user interaction
3. Generate specification after confirmation

Quick Mode (--quick)

Generate from a brief project description:

1. Infer typical requirements from the description
2. Generate based on best practices
3. Complete without dialogue

Full Workflow (full)

Generate all three documents sequentially:

1. Generate requirement.md
2. Read requirement.md → generate design.md
3. Read design.md → generate tasks.md

Requirement ID System

Specifications use the following ID prefixes:

• [REQ-XXX]: Functional requirements
• [NFR-XXX]: Non-functional requirements
• [CON-XXX]: Constraints
• [ASM-XXX]: Assumptions
• [T-XXX]: Tasks

These IDs ensure traceability across documents.

YAGNI Principle

Do not include unless explicitly requested or discussed:

❌ Authentication & Authorization

• Complex permission management (when basic auth suffices)
• Role-based access control with multiple roles (admin/user is usually enough)
• Social login integration (when basic email/password auth is sufficient)
• Fine-grained permission systems

❌ Analytics & Monitoring

• Advanced analytics/reporting dashboards
• Detailed audit logging (unless compliance requirements exist)
• Real-time metrics and monitoring
• User behavior tracking
• A/B testing infrastructure

❌ Infrastructure & Scalability

• Multi-tenant support (unless explicitly required)
• API versioning (unless external integration requirements exist)
• Async processing (unless performance requirements demand it)
• Batch processing/scheduled jobs (unless specified)
• Auto-scaling infrastructure
• Load balancing configuration

❌ User Experience

• Real-time notifications/updates (unless explicitly required)
• Advanced search/filtering (when basic search suffices)
• Data export features (PDF, Excel, etc.)
• Offline mode support
• Push notifications

❌ Development & Operations

• Data migration plans (for brand new projects)
• Multi-language/i18n support (unless specified)
• Admin dashboards (when simple CRUD interfaces suffice)
• Complex deployment pipelines
• Automated backup systems

✅ Include by Default

• Basic authentication (email/password)
• Simple CRUD operations
• Basic error handling and validation
• Essential security (HTTPS, password hashing, input sanitization)
• Core business logic only
• Simple, clear user interfaces
• Basic data persistence

When in doubt: Ask via AskUserQuestion rather than assuming the feature is needed.

Optional Enhancements

When advanced analysis tools are available in your environment, consider using them for:

• Systematic analysis of complex, interconnected requirements
• Framework-specific best practices and pattern lookup
• Existing codebase semantic analysis and symbol navigation
• UI/UX pattern recommendations

Post-Completion Actions

After each phase, suggest next actions with AskUserQuestion:

After init:

question: "Requirements document generated. What's next?"
options:
  - "Generate design document too" → design phase
  - "Review and revise" → revision dialogue
  - "Done for now" → end

After design:

question: "Design document generated. What's next?"
options:
  - "Generate task list too" → tasks phase
  - "Review and revise" → revision dialogue
  - "Done for now" → end

After tasks:

question: "Task list generated. What's next?"
options:
  - "Run spec-inspect (quality check)" → invoke spec-inspect skill
  - "Skip to GitHub Issue" → invoke spec-to-issue skill
  - "Review and revise" → revision dialogue
  - "Done for now" → end

After full:

question: "All three spec documents are complete."
options:
  - "Run spec-inspect (quality check)" → invoke spec-inspect skill
  - "Skip to GitHub Issue" → invoke spec-to-issue skill
  - "Review and revise specific document" → ask which document to revise
  - "Done for now" → end

Usage Examples

# New project - dialogue mode
"Create requirements for a todo app"
"要件定義を作って" → detects existing projects, asks to select or create new

# Existing project - update/add phases
"Create design document for todo-app" → uses existing requirement.md as context
「todo-appのタスクリストを作って」 → uses existing design.md as context

# Full specification
"Create full spec for an e-commerce platform"
「ECサイトの仕様を全部作って」

# Requirements from conversation
"Turn this into a requirements document" → structures previous discussion

# Quick mode
"Create requirements for a blog platform --quick"

# Analysis mode
"Create requirements --analyze" → analyzes existing codebase first