Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

seo-auditSEO 审核

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

23,280

周安装

951

GitHub Stars

11,678

下载量

7,532
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seo-audit(SEO 审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/seo-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill seo-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill seo-audit

简介

seo-audit 用于网站 SEO 健康度评估和关键词机会挖掘。

  • 适用于需要识别内容缺口、技术问题和竞争对手分析的营销场景。
  • 提供优先级的执行计划,帮助制定可落地的优化策略。
  • 需用户提供目标 URL 或关键词作为分析起点。seo-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 建议结合 Google Search Console 等官方工具交叉验证结果。

SKILL.md

/seo-audit

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.

Trigger

User runs /seo-audit or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.

Inputs

Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:

  1. URL or domain — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
  2. Audit type — one of: If not specified, default to full site audit.

- Full site audit — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below - Keyword research — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain - Content gap analysis — find topics competitors rank for that you don't - Technical SEO check — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues - Competitor SEO comparison — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors

  1. Target keywords or topics (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
  2. Competitors (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.

Process

1. Keyword Research

Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.

If ~~SEO tools are connected:

  • Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
  • Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground

If ~~product analytics are connected:

  • Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions

If tools are not connected:

  • Use web search to research the keyword landscape
  • Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."

For each keyword opportunity, assess:

  • Primary keywords — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
  • Secondary keywords — supporting terms and variations
  • Search volume signals — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
  • Keyword difficulty — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
  • Long-tail opportunities — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
  • Question-based keywords — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
  • Intent classification — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional

2. On-Page SEO Audit

For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:

  • Title tags — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
  • Meta descriptions — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
  • H1 tags — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
  • H2/H3 structure — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
  • Keyword usage — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
  • Internal linking — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
  • Image alt text — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
  • URL structure — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth

3. Content Gap Analysis

Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:

  • Competitor topic coverage — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
  • Content freshness — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
  • Thin content — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
  • Missing content types — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
  • Funnel gaps — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
  • Topic clusters — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content

4. Technical SEO Checklist

Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:

  • Page speed — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
  • Mobile-friendliness — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
  • Structured data — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
  • Crawlability — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
  • Broken links — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
  • HTTPS — secure connection, mixed content issues
  • Core Web Vitals signals — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
  • Indexation — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks

5. Competitor SEO Comparison

For each competitor, compare:

  • Keyword overlap — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
  • Keyword gaps — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
  • Domain authority signals — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
  • Content depth — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
  • Backlink profile observations — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
  • SERP feature ownership — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
  • Technical advantages — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage

Output

Executive Summary

Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:

  • The site's biggest strength
  • The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
  • An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues

Keyword Opportunity Table

KeywordEst. DifficultyOpportunity ScoreCurrent RankingIntentRecommended Content Type

Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.

Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.

On-Page Issues Table

PageIssueSeverityRecommended Fix

Severity levels:

  • Critical — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
  • High — significant impact on SEO performance
  • Medium — best practice violation, moderate impact
  • Low — minor optimization opportunity

Content Gap Recommendations

For each content gap identified, provide:

  • Topic or keyword to target
  • Why it matters — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
  • Recommended format — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
  • Priority — high, medium, or low
  • Estimated effort — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)

Technical SEO Checklist

CheckStatusDetails

Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.

Competitor Comparison Summary

DimensionYour SiteCompetitor ACompetitor BWinner

Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.

Prioritized Action Plan

Split recommendations into two categories:

Quick Wins (do this week):

  • Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
  • Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text

Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):

  • Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
  • Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure

For each action item, include:

  • What to do (specific and concrete)
  • Expected impact (high, medium, low)
  • Effort estimate
  • Dependencies (if any)

Follow-Up

After presenting the audit, ask:

"Would you like me to:

  • Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
  • Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
  • Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
  • Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
  • Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.96%
按下载量换算2,784

Claude

25.8%
按下载量换算1,943

Cursor

19.71%
按下载量换算1,485

Gemini CLI

8.53%
按下载量换算642

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills