Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

app-intents-code-review应用程序意图代码审查

Agent Skill

app-intents-code-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

5,410

周安装

221

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,750
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:app-intents-code-review(应用程序意图代码审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/app-intents-code-review
安装命令:
openclaw skills install app-intents-code-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install app-intents-code-review

简介

app-intents-code-review 用于检查 Swift 应用中 AppIntents 的结构和参数。

  • 适合审核意图识别、实体定义和快捷方式配置。
  • 可发现代码中的模式错误和参数缺失问题。
  • 使用前需确认项目是否使用 import AppIntents 及相关装饰器。
  • 建议结合 Xcode 工程结构验证代码上下文完整性。

SKILL.md

name
app-intents-code-review
description
Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

App Intents Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
AppIntent protocol, perform(), return typesreferences/intent-structure.md
AppEntity, EntityQuery, identifiersreferences/entities.md
AppShortcutsProvider, phrases, discoveryreferences/shortcuts.md
@Parameter, validation, dynamic optionsreferences/parameters.md

Review Checklist

  • [ ] perform() marked with @MainActor if accessing UI/main thread resources
  • [ ] perform() completes within 30-second timeout (no heavy downloads/processing)
  • [ ] Custom errors conform to CustomLocalizedStringResourceConvertible
  • [ ] EntityQuery.entities(for:) handles missing identifiers gracefully
  • [ ] EntityStringQuery used if Siri voice input needed (not plain EntityQuery)
  • [ ] suggestedEntities() returns reasonable defaults for disambiguation
  • [ ] AppShortcut phrases include .applicationName parameter
  • [ ] Non-optional @Parameter has sensible defaults or uses requestValue()
  • [ ] @IntentParameterDependency not used on iOS 16 targets (crashes)
  • [ ] Phrases localized in AppShortcuts.strings, not Localizable.strings
  • [ ] App Intents defined in app bundle, not Swift Package (pre-iOS 17)
  • [ ] isDiscoverable = false for internal/widget-only intents

When to Load References

  • AppIntent protocol implementation -> intent-structure.md
  • Entity queries, identifiers, Spotlight -> entities.md
  • App Shortcuts, phrases, discovery -> shortcuts.md
  • Parameter validation, dynamic options -> parameters.md

Review Questions

  1. Does perform() handle timeout limits for long-running operations?
  2. Are entity queries self-contained (no @Dependency injection in Siri context)?
  3. Do phrases read naturally and include the app name?
  4. Are SwiftData models passed by persistentModelID, not directly?
  5. Would migrating from SiriKit break existing user shortcuts?

Hard gates (before reporting)

Complete in order for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.

  1. Location artifact — The finding includes [FILE:LINE] (or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo.
  2. Scope read — You read the full surrounding type: the AppIntent / AppEntity / EntityQuery / AppShortcutsProvider (or equivalent) that contains the flagged code, not only a diff hunk or snippet.
  3. Platform or integration claim (only if the finding depends on minimum iOS, Swift Package vs app target, @IntentParameterDependency availability, SiriKit migration, or isDiscoverable / extension placement) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET or target membership in the Xcode project, Package.swift platforms, entitlements, or where the intent file lives) or you drop or downgrade the finding to an open question.
  4. Protocol — Pre-report steps in review-verification-protocol are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).

Use the issue format [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

94.36%
按下载量换算1,651

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills