Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

cmo-advisor首席营销官顾问

Agent Skill

cmo-advisor 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

11,760

周安装

490

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,920
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cmo-advisor(首席营销官顾问)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/cmo-advisor
安装命令:
openclaw skills install cmo-advisor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install cmo-advisor

简介

cmo-advisor 专注首席营销官职责,支持品牌定位与增长模式设计。

  • 提供营销预算分配方案、组织结构设计及规模化扩张策略等核心能力。
  • 适用于需要快速构建营销体系或优化现有增长路径的场景。
  • 安装命令为 openclaw skills install cmo-advisor,需确认是否接入外部营销平台。
  • 使用前请核实技能是否具备实时市场数据访问权限,避免输出过时信息。

SKILL.md

name
cmo-advisor
description
Marketing leadership for scaling companies. Brand positioning, growth model design, marketing budget allocation, and marketing org design. Use when designing brand strategy, selecting growth models (PLG vs sales-led vs community-led), allocating marketing budgets, building marketing teams, or when user mentions CMO, brand strategy, growth model, CAC, LTV, channel mix, or marketing ROI.
license
MIT
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Alireza Rezvani
category
c-level
domain
cmo-leadership
updated
2026-03-05
python-tools
marketing_budget_modeler.py, growth_model_simulator.py
frameworks
brand-positioning, growth-frameworks, marketing-org

CMO Advisor

Strategic marketing leadership — brand positioning, growth model design, budget allocation, and org design. Not campaign execution or content creation; those have their own skills. This is the engine.

Keywords

CMO, chief marketing officer, brand strategy, brand positioning, growth model, product-led growth, PLG, sales-led growth, community-led growth, marketing budget, CAC, customer acquisition cost, LTV, lifetime value, channel mix, marketing ROI, pipeline contribution, marketing org, category design, competitive positioning, growth loops, payback period, MQL, pipeline coverage

Quick Start

# Model budget allocation across channels, project MQL output by scenario
python scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py

# Project MRR growth by model, show impact of channel mix shifts
python scripts/growth_model_simulator.py

Reference docs (load when needed):

  • references/brand_positioning.md — category design, messaging architecture, battlecards, rebrand framework
  • references/growth_frameworks.md — PLG/SLG/CLG playbooks, growth loops, switching models
  • references/marketing_org.md — team structure by stage, hiring sequence, agency vs. in-house

The Four CMO Questions

Every CMO must own answers to these — no one else in the C-suite can:

  1. Who are we for? — ICP, positioning, category
  2. Why do they choose us? — Differentiation, messaging, brand
  3. How do they find us? — Growth model, channel mix, demand gen
  4. Is it working? — CAC, LTV:CAC, pipeline contribution, payback period

Core Responsibilities (Brief)

Brand & Positioning — Define category, build messaging architecture, maintain competitive differentiation. Details → references/brand_positioning.md

Growth Model — Choose and operate the right acquisition engine: PLG, sales-led, community-led, or hybrid. The growth model determines team structure, budget, and what "working" means. Details → references/growth_frameworks.md

Marketing Budget — Allocate from revenue target backward: new customers needed → conversion rates by stage → MQLs needed → spend by channel based on CAC. Run marketing_budget_modeler.py for scenarios.

Marketing Org — Structure follows growth model. Hire in sequence: generalist first, then specialist in the working channel, then PMM, then marketing ops. Details → references/marketing_org.md

Channel Mix — Audit quarterly: MQLs, cost, CAC, payback, trend. Scale what's improving. Cut what's worsening. Don't optimize a channel that isn't in the strategy.

Board Reporting — Pipeline contribution, CAC by channel, payback period, LTV:CAC. Not impressions. Not MQLs in isolation.


Key Diagnostic Questions

Ask these before making any strategic recommendation:

  • What's your CAC by channel (not blended)?
  • What's the payback period on your largest channel?
  • What's your LTV:CAC ratio?
  • What % of pipeline is marketing-sourced vs. sales-sourced?
  • Where do your best customers (highest LTV, lowest churn) come from?
  • What's your MQL → Opportunity conversion rate? (proxy for lead quality)
  • Is this brand work or performance marketing? (different timelines, different metrics)
  • What's the activation rate in the product? (PLG signal)
  • If a prospect doesn't buy, why not? (win/loss data)

CMO Metrics Dashboard

CategoryMetricHealthy Target
PipelineMarketing-sourced pipeline %50–70% of total
PipelinePipeline coverage ratio3–4x quarterly quota
PipelineMQL → Opportunity rate> 15%
EfficiencyBlended CAC payback< 18 months
EfficiencyLTV:CAC ratio> 3:1
EfficiencyMarketing % of total S&M spend30–50%
GrowthBrand search volume trend↑ QoQ
GrowthWin rate vs. primary competitor> 50%
RetentionNPS (marketing-sourced cohort)> 40

Red Flags

  • No defined ICP — "companies with 50-1000 employees" is not an ICP
  • Marketing and sales disagree on what an MQL is (this is always a system problem, not a people problem)
  • CAC tracked only as a blended number — channel-level CAC is non-negotiable
  • Pipeline attribution is self-reported by sales reps, not CRM-timestamped
  • CMO can't answer "what's our payback period?" without a 48-hour research project
  • Brand work and performance marketing have no shared narrative — they're contradicting each other
  • Marketing team is producing content with no documented positioning to anchor it
  • Growth model was chosen because a competitor uses it, not because the product/ACV/ICP fits

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...CMO works with...To...
Pricing changesCFO + CEOUnderstand margin impact on positioning and messaging
Product launchCPO + CTODefine launch tier, GTM motion, messaging
Pipeline missCFO + CRODiagnose: volume problem, quality problem, or velocity problem
Category designCEOSecure multi-year organizational commitment to the narrative
New market entryCEO + CFOValidate ICP, budget, localization requirements
Sales misalignmentCROAlign on MQL definition, SLA, and pipeline ownership
Hiring planCHRODefine marketing headcount and skill profile by stage
Retention insightsCCOUse expansion and churn data to sharpen ICP and messaging
Competitive threatCEO + CROCoordinate battlecards, win/loss, repositioning response

Resources

  • References: references/brand_positioning.md, references/growth_frameworks.md, references/marketing_org.md
  • Scripts: scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py, scripts/growth_model_simulator.py

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • CAC rising quarter over quarter → channel efficiency declining, investigate
  • No brand positioning documented → messaging inconsistent across channels
  • Marketing budget allocation hasn't changed in 6+ months → market changed, budget didn't
  • Competitor launched major campaign → flag for competitive response
  • Pipeline contribution from marketing unclear → measurement gap, fix before spending more

Output Artifacts

RequestYou Produce
"Plan our marketing budget"Channel allocation model with CAC targets per channel
"Position us vs competitors"Positioning map + messaging framework + proof points
"Design our growth model"Growth projection with channel mix scenarios
"Build the marketing team"Hiring plan with sequence, roles, agency vs in-house
"Marketing board section"Pipeline contribution report with channel ROI

Reasoning Technique: Recursion of Thought

Draft a marketing strategy, then critique it from the customer's perspective. Refine based on the critique. Repeat until the strategy survives scrutiny.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

82.59%
按下载量换算3,238

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills