Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

quality-manager-qmr质量经理 qmr

Agent Skill

quality-manager-qmr 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

4,097

周安装

169

GitHub Stars

13,183

下载量

1,338
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:quality-manager-qmr(质量经理 qmr)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/quality-manager-qmr
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill quality-manager-qmr
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill quality-manager-qmr

简介

quality-manager-qmr 履行质量经理代表职责,统筹管理评审、KPI 监控与法规符合性 oversight。

  • 依据 ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2 要求建立质量目标分解机制与质量文化评估工具。
  • 主导内部审核结果评审与供应商质量协议管理,推动持续改进闭环形成。
  • 所有决策需保留书面证据链,确保在监管检查中可提供完整过程追溯记录。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR)

Quality system accountability, management review leadership, and regulatory compliance oversight per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2 requirements.


Table of Contents


QMR Responsibilities

ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2 Requirements

ResponsibilityScopeEvidence
QMS effectivenessMonitor system performance and suitabilityManagement review records
Reporting to managementCommunicate QMS performance to top managementQuality reports, dashboards
Quality awarenessPromote regulatory and quality requirementsTraining records, communications
Liaison with external partiesInterface with regulators, Notified BodiesMeeting records, correspondence

QMR Accountability Matrix

DomainAccountable ForReports ToFrequency
Quality PolicyPolicy adequacy and communicationCEO/BoardAnnual review
Quality ObjectivesObjective achievement and relevanceExecutive TeamQuarterly
QMS PerformanceSystem effectiveness metricsManagementMonthly
Regulatory ComplianceCompliance status across jurisdictionsCEOQuarterly
Audit ProgramAudit schedule completion, findings closureManagementPer audit
CAPA OversightCAPA effectiveness and timelinessExecutive TeamMonthly

Authority Boundaries

Decision TypeQMR AuthorityEscalation Required
Process changes within QMSApprove with ownerMajor process redesign
Document approvalFinal QA approvalPolicy-level changes
Nonconformity dispositionAccept/reject with MRBProduct release decisions
Supplier quality actionsQuality holds, auditsSupplier termination
Audit schedulingAdjust internal audit scheduleExternal audit timing
Training requirementsDefine quality training needsOrganization-wide training budget

Management Review Workflow

Conduct management reviews per ISO 13485 Clause 5.6 requirements.

Workflow: Prepare and Execute Management Review

  1. Schedule management review (minimum annually, typically quarterly or semi-annually)
  2. Notify all required attendees minimum 2 weeks prior
  3. Collect required inputs from process owners:

- Audit results (internal and external) - Customer feedback (complaints, satisfaction, returns) - Process performance and product conformity - CAPA status and effectiveness - Previous review action items - Changes affecting QMS (regulatory, organizational) - Recommendations for improvement

  1. Compile input summary report with trend analysis
  2. Prepare presentation materials with supporting data
  3. Distribute agenda and input package 1 week prior
  4. Conduct review meeting per agenda
  5. Validation: All required inputs reviewed; decisions documented with owners and due dates

Required Attendees

RoleRequirementInput Responsibility
CEO/General ManagerRequiredStrategic decisions
QMRChairOverall QMS status
Department HeadsRequiredProcess performance
RA ManagerRequiredRegulatory changes
Production ManagerRequiredProduct conformity
Customer QualityRequiredComplaint data

Management Review Input Template

MANAGEMENT REVIEW INPUT SUMMARY

Review Period: [Start Date] to [End Date]
Review Date: [Scheduled Date]
Prepared By: [QMR Name]

1. AUDIT RESULTS
   Internal audits completed: [X] of [X] planned
   External audits completed: [X]
   Total findings: [X] major / [X] minor
   Open findings: [X]
   Finding trends: [Analysis]

2. CUSTOMER FEEDBACK
   Complaints received: [X]
   Complaint rate: [X per 1000 units]
   Customer satisfaction score: [X.X/5.0]
   Returns: [X] units ([X]%)
   Top issues: [Categories]

3. PROCESS PERFORMANCE
   [Process 1]: [Metric] vs [Target] - [Status]
   [Process 2]: [Metric] vs [Target] - [Status]
   Out-of-spec processes: [List]

4. PRODUCT CONFORMITY
   First pass yield: [X]%
   Nonconformance rate: [X]%
   Scrap cost: $[X]
   Top defect categories: [List]

5. CAPA STATUS
   Open CAPAs: [X]
   Overdue: [X]
   Effectiveness rate: [X]%
   Average age: [X] days

6. PREVIOUS ACTIONS
   Total from last review: [X]
   Completed: [X] | In progress: [X] | Overdue: [X]

7. CHANGES AFFECTING QMS
   Regulatory: [List changes]
   Organizational: [List changes]
   Process: [List changes]

8. RECOMMENDATIONS
   [Collected improvement opportunities]

Management Review Output Requirements

OutputDocumentationOwner
QMS improvement decisionsAction items with due datesAssigned per item
Resource needsResource plan updatesDepartment heads
Quality objectives changesUpdated objectives documentQMR
Process improvement needsImprovement project chartersProcess owners

See: references/management-review-guide.md


Quality KPI Management Workflow

Establish, monitor, and report quality performance indicators.

Workflow: Establish Quality KPI Framework

  1. Identify quality objectives requiring measurement
  2. Select KPIs per objective using SMART criteria:

- Specific: Clear definition and calculation - Measurable: Quantifiable with available data - Actionable: Team can influence results - Relevant: Aligned to quality objectives - Time-bound: Defined measurement frequency

  1. Define target values based on baseline data and benchmarks
  2. Assign data source and collection responsibility
  3. Establish reporting frequency per KPI category
  4. Configure dashboard displays and trend analysis
  5. Define escalation thresholds and alert triggers
  6. Validation: Each KPI has owner, target, data source, and escalation criteria

Core Quality KPIs

CategoryKPITargetCalculation
ProcessFirst Pass Yield>95%(Units passed first time / Total units) × 100
ProcessNonconformance Rate<1%(NC count / Total units) × 100
CAPACAPA Closure Rate>90%(On-time closures / Due closures) × 100
CAPACAPA Effectiveness>85%(Effective CAPAs / Verified CAPAs) × 100
AuditFinding Closure Rate>90%(On-time closures / Due closures) × 100
AuditRepeat Finding Rate<10%(Repeat findings / Total findings) × 100
CustomerComplaint Rate<0.1%(Complaints / Units sold) × 100
CustomerSatisfaction Score>4.0/5.0Average of survey scores

KPI Review Frequency

KPI TypeReview FrequencyTrend PeriodAudience
Safety/ComplianceDaily monitoringWeeklyOperations
Production QualityWeeklyMonthlyDepartment heads
Customer QualityMonthlyQuarterlyExecutive team
Strategic QualityQuarterlyAnnualBoard/C-suite

Performance Response Matrix

Performance LevelStatusAction Required
>110% of targetExceedingConsider raising target
100-110% of targetMeetingMaintain current approach
90-100% of targetApproachingMonitor closely
80-90% of targetBelowImprovement plan required
<80% of targetCriticalImmediate intervention

See: references/quality-kpi-framework.md


Quality Objectives Workflow

Establish and maintain measurable quality objectives per ISO 13485 Clause 5.4.1.

Workflow: Annual Quality Objectives Setting

  1. Review prior year objective achievement
  2. Analyze quality performance trends and gaps
  3. Align with organizational strategic plan
  4. Draft objectives with measurable targets
  5. Validate resource availability for achievement
  6. Obtain executive approval
  7. Communicate objectives organization-wide
  8. Validation: Each objective is measurable, has owner, target, and timeline

Quality Objective Structure

QUALITY OBJECTIVE [Number]

Objective Statement: [Clear, measurable statement]
Aligned to Policy Element: [Quality policy section]
Target: [Specific measurable target]
Baseline: [Current performance]
Owner: [Name and title]
Due Date: [Target achievement date]

Success Criteria:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]

Measurement Method: [How progress is tracked]
Reporting Frequency: [Monthly/Quarterly]

Supporting Initiatives:
- [Initiative 1]
- [Initiative 2]

Resource Requirements:
- [Resource 1]
- [Resource 2]

Objective Categories

CategoryExample ObjectivesTypical Targets
Customer QualityReduce complaint rate<0.1% of units sold
Process QualityImprove first pass yield>96%
ComplianceMaintain certificationZero major NCs
EfficiencyReduce quality costs<4% of revenue
CultureIncrease training completion>98% on-time

Quarterly Objective Review

Review ElementAssessmentAction
Progress vs. targetOn track / Behind / AheadAdjust resources if behind
RelevanceStill valid / Needs updateModify if conditions changed
ResourcesAdequate / InsufficientRequest additional if needed
BarriersIdentified obstaclesEscalate for resolution

Quality Culture Assessment Workflow

Assess and improve organizational quality culture.

Workflow: Annual Quality Culture Assessment

  1. Design or select quality culture survey instrument
  2. Define survey population (all employees or sample)
  3. Communicate survey purpose and confidentiality
  4. Administer survey with 2-week response window
  5. Analyze results by department, role, and tenure
  6. Identify strengths and improvement areas
  7. Develop action plan for culture gaps
  8. Validation: Response rate >60%; action plan addresses bottom 3 scores

Quality Culture Dimensions

DimensionIndicatorsAssessment Method
Leadership commitmentManagement visible support for qualitySurvey, observation
Quality ownershipEmployees feel responsible for qualitySurvey
CommunicationQuality information flows effectivelySurvey, audit
Continuous improvementSuggestions submitted and implementedMetrics
Training and competenceEmployees feel adequately trainedSurvey, records
Problem solvingIssues addressed at root causeCAPA analysis

Culture Survey Categories

CategorySample Questions
Leadership"Management demonstrates commitment to quality"
Resources"I have the tools and training to do quality work"
Communication"Quality expectations are clearly communicated"
Empowerment"I am encouraged to report quality issues"
Recognition"Quality achievements are recognized"

Culture Improvement Actions

Gap IdentifiedPotential Actions
Low leadership visibilityQuality gemba walks, all-hands quality updates
Inadequate trainingCompetency-based training program
Poor communicationQuality newsletters, department huddles
Low reportingAnonymous reporting system, no-blame culture
Lack of recognitionQuality award program, team celebrations

Regulatory Compliance Oversight

Monitor and maintain regulatory compliance across jurisdictions.

Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance Matrix

JurisdictionRegulationRequirementStatus Tracking
EUMDR 2017/745CE marking, Notified BodyTechnical file, annual review
USA21 CFR 820FDA registration, QSR complianceAnnual registration, inspections
InternationalISO 13485QMS certificationSurveillance audits
GermanyMPG/MPDGNational implementationCompetent authority filings

Compliance Monitoring Workflow

  1. Maintain regulatory requirement register
  2. Subscribe to regulatory update services
  3. Assess impact of regulatory changes monthly
  4. Update affected processes within 90 days of effective date
  5. Verify training completion for regulatory changes
  6. Document compliance status in management review
  7. Maintain inspection readiness checklist
  8. Validation: All applicable requirements mapped; no expired registrations

Regulatory Authority Interface

ActivityQMR RolePreparation Required
Notified Body auditPrimary contactAudit package, personnel schedules
FDA inspectionHost, escort coordinatorInspection readiness review
Competent Authority inquiryResponse coordinatorTechnical file access
Regulatory meetingAttendee or delegateBriefing materials

Inspection Readiness Checklist

AreaReadyAction Needed
Document control system current
Training records complete
CAPA system current, no overdue items
Complaint files complete
Equipment calibration current
Supplier qualification files complete
Management review records available
Internal audit program current

Decision Frameworks

Escalation Decision Tree

Issue Identified
      │
      ▼
Is it a regulatory violation?
      │
  Yes─┴─No
  │      │
  ▼      ▼
Escalate to    Is it a safety issue?
Executive          │
immediately    Yes─┴─No
               │      │
               ▼      ▼
          Escalate to   Does it affect
          Safety Team   multiple departments?
                             │
                         Yes─┴─No
                         │      │
                         ▼      ▼
                    Escalate to  Handle at
                    Executive    department level

Quality Investment Prioritization

CriteriaWeightScore Method
Regulatory requirement30%Required=10, Recommended=5, Optional=2
Customer impact25%Direct=10, Indirect=5, None=0
Cost savings potential20%>$100K=10, $50-100K=7, <$50K=3
Implementation complexity15%Simple=10, Moderate=5, Complex=2
Strategic alignment10%Core=10, Supporting=5, Peripheral=2

Resource Allocation Matrix

Resource TypeAllocation AuthorityEscalation Threshold
Quality personnelQMR>1 FTE addition
Quality equipmentQMR>$25K
External consultantsQMR>$50K or >30 days
Quality systemsExecutive approval>$100K

Tools and References

Scripts

ToolPurposeUsage
management_review_tracker.pyTrack review inputs, actions, metricspython management_review_tracker.py --help

Management Review Tracker Features:

  • Track input collection status from process owners
  • Monitor action item completion and aging
  • Generate metrics summary for review
  • Produce recommendations for review focus areas

References

DocumentContent
management-review-guide.mdISO 13485 Clause 5.6 requirements, input/output templates, action tracking
quality-kpi-framework.mdKPI categories, targets, calculations, dashboard templates

Quick Reference: Management Review Inputs (ISO 13485 Clause 5.6.2)

InputSourceRequired
FeedbackCustomer complaints, surveysYes
Audit resultsInternal and external auditsYes
Process performanceProcess metricsYes
Product conformityInspection, NC dataYes
CAPA statusCAPA systemYes
Previous actionsPrior review recordsYes
ChangesRegulatory, organizationalYes
RecommendationsAll sourcesYes

Quick Reference: Management Review Outputs (ISO 13485 Clause 5.6.3)

OutputDocumentation Required
Improvement to QMS and processesAction items with owners
Improvement to productProject initiation if needed
Resource needsResource plan updates

Related Skills

SkillIntegration Point
quality-manager-qms-iso13485QMS process management
capa-officerCAPA system oversight
qms-audit-expertInternal audit program
quality-documentation-managerDocument control oversight

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

26.56%
按下载量换算355

OpenCode

21.4%
按下载量换算286

Gemini CLI

20.02%
按下载量换算268

Codex

12.34%
按下载量换算165

Cursor

8.16%
按下载量换算109

Antigravity

3.94%
按下载量换算53

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills