Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

agentationagentation 命令行

Agent Skill

agentation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

570

周安装

24

GitHub Stars

11

下载量

1
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agentation(agentation 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/skills-template
仓库路径:skills/agentation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/skills-template --skill agentation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/skills-template --skill agentation

简介

agentation 实现人类与 AI 代理间的可视化 UI 反馈桥梁,精准定位界面元素。

  • 适用于迭代式 UI 评审、缺陷标注与自动修复闭环流程。
  • 通过 CSS 选择器与组件树映射,直接驱动代码层修改而非描述性沟通。
  • 需配合屏幕录制或截图工具提供视觉证据链支持。
  • 在高保真原型阶段使用效果更佳,降低语义歧义风险。

SKILL.md

agentation

agentation is the rendered-UI feedback bridge in this repo.

Use it when a human needs to click the actual UI, attach feedback to the exact element or region they mean, and pass a structured packet to the coding agent. The main job is annotation routing: choose the right annotation mode, capture precise evidence, then hand the fix loop to the right adjacent skill or agent runtime.

When to use this skill

Use agentation when the task needs one or more of these:

  • a human reviewer pointing at a real UI element instead of describing it vaguely
  • structured feedback packets with selectors, element paths, bounding boxes, or copied markdown
  • a local copy-paste review loop between a browser and a coding agent
  • an MCP-backed sync/watch loop where new annotations flow into the agent context automatically
  • a self-driving critique/fix loop that still starts from rendered UI evidence
  • platform setup for passing pending UI annotations into Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode

Do not use agentation by default for:

  • fresh-session browser verification or deterministic regression checks → agent-browser
  • running-browser, logged-in, or extension-dependent browser reuse → playwriter
  • plan review, diff approval, or visual sign-off on a proposed artifact → plannotator
  • generic design-system, accessibility, or heuristic audits without a concrete rendered UI packet

Quick routing rule

If the job needs...Use
Human clicks the UI and leaves exact feedback for the agentagentation
Browser verification in a clean repeatable sessionagent-browser
The user's already-open browser, cookies, or logged-in tabsplaywriter
Review or approval of a plan/diff before executionplannotator

Instructions

Step 1: Choose the right annotation mode

Pick one mode before touching setup details:

ModeUse whenOutput
Copy-paste reviewOne reviewer wants to annotate UI and paste the packet into chata structured markdown packet
Synced watch loopNew annotations should appear in the agent workflow automaticallypending-annotation queue + loop
Self-driving critiqueAn agent/browser loop will generate or consume annotations repeatedlya review/fix loop packet
Platform setupThe core problem is wiring the annotation bridge into Claude/Codex/Gemini/OpenCodea setup checklist and config target

If the task is really “test the website” or “drive the logged-in browser,” route out first and only come back to agentation if exact human UI feedback is the missing piece.

Step 2: Keep the browser boundary explicit

agentation does not replace the browser runtime choice.

  • Use agent-browser when you want a clean disposable verification browser.
  • Use playwriter when you must reuse the user's real browser session.
  • Use agentation once there is a rendered page that a human or loop should annotate precisely.

Step 3: Follow the core loop

  1. Prepare the rendered UI

- Choose the correct browser/runtime skill first if needed.

  1. Add the Agentation toolbar to the app in development.
  2. Pick the annotation mode: copy-paste, watch loop, self-driving, or setup.
  3. Capture one concrete UI packet.
  4. Hand the packet to the coding agent.
  5. Re-verify after the fix using the same review lane.

Step 4: Use the fastest safe install path

For most setups, the practical order is:

# React toolbar
npm install agentation -D

# MCP bridge / auto-registration for supported agents
npx add-mcp "npx -y agentation-mcp server"

# verify the bridge
npx agentation-mcp doctor

Claude Code users can also install the upstream official skill when that is the simplest way to bootstrap the experience:

npx skills add benjitaylor/agentation -g
# then use /agentation in Claude Code

Step 5: Use a minimal toolbar integration first

Start with the smallest useful embed:

import { Agentation } from 'agentation';

function App() {
  return (
    <>
      <YourApp />
      {process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' && <Agentation />}
    </>
  )
}

Only add endpoint, callbacks, or webhook behavior when the chosen mode actually needs them.

Step 6: Choose the right handoff pattern

A. Copy-paste review

Use when a human is actively reviewing the page and pasting the packet into an agent chat.

Good for:

  • quick bug/UI polish rounds
  • one-off targeted fixes
  • low-setup collaboration

B. Synced watch loop

Use when the agent should poll or ingest pending annotations continuously.

Good for:

  • repeated QA/fix passes
  • designer ↔ agent loops
  • local review queues during active frontend work

Use the bundled verification script before trusting the loop:

bash .agent-skills/agentation/scripts/verify-loop.sh

C. Self-driving critique

Use when an agent/browser loop is reviewing UI repeatedly and agentation is the structured feedback packet, not the browser runtime itself.

Typical shape:

  • browser tool captures current state
  • agentation encodes concrete feedback targets
  • coding agent applies the fix
  • browser tool re-checks the result

Step 7: Keep platform setup narrow

When the request is really about platform wiring, answer only:

  • where the config lives
  • how agentation-mcp is registered
  • how pending annotations enter the agent loop
  • how to verify the setup

Push the platform-specific config blocks into the references instead of bloating the main workflow.

Scripts

Prefer the bundled scripts before retyping long commands:

ScriptPurpose
scripts/setup-agentation-mcp.shRegister the MCP bridge for supported agents
scripts/verify-loop.shValidate annotation queue / ACK → RESOLVE style watch-loop behavior

Examples

Example 1: Human reviewer wants exact UI feedback

  • Prompt: "I can point at the broken checkout button, but I don't want to describe selectors manually."
  • Expected behavior: choose agentation, recommend copy-paste review or sync mode, keep browser-runtime choice separate.

Example 2: Browser verification is the real job

  • Prompt: "Run a repeatable headless UI regression check and compare the results."
  • Expected behavior: route to agent-browser, not agentation, unless human annotation becomes a follow-up step.

Example 3: Logged-in browser reuse

  • Prompt: "Use the browser I'm already signed into and let me annotate a billing page issue."
  • Expected behavior: route the browser runtime to playwriter, then use agentation for the annotation packet.

Example 4: Planning review, not UI review

  • Prompt: "Open the generated plan in a browser so I can approve or reject steps before coding starts."
  • Expected behavior: route to plannotator, because the artifact is a plan/diff rather than a rendered UI issue.

Best practices

  1. Pick the browser/runtime lane first; agentation is the feedback bridge, not every browser tool.
  2. Prefer one annotation mode at a time instead of mixing copy-paste, watch loop, and platform setup in a single answer.
  3. Keep the first integration minimal; only add hooks, callbacks, or webhooks when the workflow needs them.
  4. Re-verify after fixes with the same review lane that produced the annotation.
  5. Treat exact UI feedback as the deliverable — not a giant dump of install permutations.
  6. Route out aggressively when the task is really plan review, fresh-browser verification, or running-browser reuse.

References

Deep-dive docs in this skill:

Primary sources:

Metadata

  • Version: 1.1.0
  • Last updated: 2026-04-15
  • Scope: exact rendered-UI feedback packets, watch loops, and platform handoff for coding agents

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.53%
按下载量换算0

Claude

33.65%
按下载量换算0

Cursor

17.51%
按下载量换算0

Gemini CLI

9.7%
按下载量换算0

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills