Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

ai-writing-assistantAI 写作助手

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

475

周安装

20

GitHub Stars

61

下载量

166
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-writing-assistant(AI 写作助手)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/ai-writing-assistant
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill ai-writing-assistant
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill ai-writing-assistant

简介

用于专业文档、README 和 Markdown 内容的 AI 增强写作。

  • 适合草稿撰写、风格统一和术语标准化等场景。
  • 可指导选择合适的 AI 工作流并验证生成内容准确性。
  • 需保持作者原始语调,避免过度修饰或能力夸大表述。
  • ai-writing-assistant 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

AI Writing Assistant Skill

Use AI tools strategically to enhance your professional writing while maintaining authenticity and quality.

Keywords

ai, chatgpt, copilot, grammarly, prompt, draft, writing assistant, voice, tone, refinement, editing, automation

When to Use This Skill

This skill provides guidance when developers need to:

  • Draft professional content with AI assistance
  • Refine and improve existing drafts using AI
  • Maintain authentic voice while using AI tools
  • Choose appropriate AI workflows for different writing tasks
  • Verify and polish AI-generated content
  • Collaborate between AI drafts and human editing

Core Philosophy

AI as collaborator, not replacement.

AI writing tools work best when you:

  1. Provide clear direction - Good prompts produce good drafts
  2. Iterate on output - First draft is never final
  3. Inject your voice - Add personality and expertise
  4. Verify everything - AI makes confident mistakes
  5. Know when NOT to use AI - Some tasks need pure human judgment

The Two Workflows

Workflow 1: AI-First Drafting

Use when: Starting from blank, need structure, time-pressured

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. PROMPT                              │
│  Provide context, constraints, examples │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. GENERATE                            │
│  Let AI produce initial draft           │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. EVALUATE                            │
│  Check accuracy, tone, completeness     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. REFINE                              │
│  Add voice, fix errors, enhance         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. VERIFY                              │
│  Final quality check before sending     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Best for:

  • First drafts of emails
  • Outline generation
  • Template creation
  • Brainstorming options
  • Summarizing content

Workflow 2: Human-First Refinement

Use when: You have ideas, need polish or alternatives

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. DRAFT                               │
│  Write your rough version first         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. ASK                                 │
│  Request specific improvements          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. COMPARE                             │
│  Evaluate AI suggestions vs original    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. MERGE                               │
│  Combine best of both versions          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. VERIFY                              │
│  Final quality check                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Best for:

  • Improving clarity
  • Finding better phrasing
  • Expanding or condensing
  • Tone adjustment
  • Grammar and style fixes

Prompt Patterns by Task

Email Prompts

Basic email draft:

Write a professional email to [recipient role] about [topic].

Context:
- [Relationship/history]
- [Goal of this email]
- [Any constraints]

Tone: [professional/friendly/urgent/casual]
Length: [brief/detailed]

Email refinement:

Improve this email for clarity and professional tone:

[Paste your draft]

Keep the core message but:
- Make it more concise
- Fix any awkward phrasing
- Ensure call-to-action is clear

Feedback Prompts

Structuring feedback:

Help me structure feedback for a team member using the SBI model.

Situation: [When and where]
Behavior: [What I observed - facts only]
Impact: [Effect on team/project/outcomes]

Make it constructive and specific. Avoid vague language.

Preparing for difficult conversation:

I need to have a difficult conversation about [topic].

Context: [Background]
My concern: [What I want to address]
Desired outcome: [What I hope to achieve]

Help me:
1. Plan my opening statement
2. Anticipate possible responses
3. Prepare redirects if conversation derails

Presentation Prompts

Outline generation:

Create an outline for a [duration] technical presentation on [topic].

Audience: [Who they are, their level]
Goal: [What should they learn/do after]
Key message: [Main takeaway]

Use the What-Why-How structure:
- What: Hook and problem statement
- Why: Why this matters to them
- How: The solution/approach
- Close: Key takeaways and CTA

Slide content:

Create slide content for: [Section topic]

Requirements:
- Title: Action-oriented, 5-8 words
- Bullets: 3-5 points, 5-7 words each
- One main idea only

This slide is about: [Specific point]

LinkedIn/Content Prompts

Post creation:

Create a LinkedIn post about [topic].

Frame: [learning/win/behind-the-build/contrarian/quick-tip]
Hook: Start with something that makes people click "see more"
Length: 150-250 words
End with: Question to drive engagement

My angle/experience: [What makes my perspective unique]

Content repurposing:

Turn this [blog post/documentation/talk] into a LinkedIn post:

[Paste content]

Extract the most interesting insight and structure as:
1. Hook (attention-grabbing opening)
2. Story/context (brief setup)
3. Insight (the key learning)
4. CTA (question for engagement)

Voice Preservation Techniques

The Voice Sample

Before using AI for your content, create a voice sample:

Analyze my writing style from these samples:

[Paste 3-5 paragraphs of your writing]

Identify:
1. Sentence structure patterns
2. Word choice tendencies
3. Tone and formality level
4. Unique phrases or expressions
5. How I open and close sections

Then use in subsequent prompts:

Write in a style that matches this voice profile:
[Paste analyzed voice profile]

Now write: [Your request]

The Injection Method

Add personal touches after AI drafting:

  1. Add your examples - Replace generic examples with real ones
  2. Insert your phrases - Add expressions you actually use
  3. Include specifics - Add names, dates, details AI couldn't know
  4. Add opinions - AI stays neutral; add your actual take
  5. Include humor - If that's your style, add it yourself

The Hybrid Paragraph

Write key paragraphs yourself, let AI fill in the rest:

Complete this draft, matching the style of paragraphs I've written:

My paragraphs (keep exactly as-is):
[Your key paragraphs]

Fill in sections marked [AI DRAFT]:
1. [AI DRAFT - Introduction]
2. [Your paragraph]
3. [AI DRAFT - Transition]
4. [Your paragraph]
5. [AI DRAFT - Conclusion]

Quality Checkpoints

Checkpoint 1: Accuracy Check

Before sending anything AI-assisted, verify:

  • All facts are correct (AI makes up statistics)
  • Names and titles are accurate
  • Technical details are right
  • Links work (AI invents URLs)
  • Quotes are real (AI fabricates quotes)
  • Dates and numbers are correct

Checkpoint 2: Tone Check

Read aloud and ask:

  • Does this sound like me?
  • Would I actually say this in person?
  • Is the formality level appropriate?
  • Are there phrases I'd never use?
  • Does it feel authentic?

Checkpoint 3: Content Check

  • Is the main point clear?
  • Is it the right length?
  • Does it answer the recipient's actual question?
  • Is the call-to-action obvious?
  • Would I be proud to have my name on this?

Checkpoint 4: Risk Check

For sensitive content:

  • Could this be misunderstood?
  • Is anything potentially offensive?
  • Am I sharing anything I shouldn't?
  • What if this were forwarded/screenshot?
  • Should a human review this?

When NOT to Use AI

Tasks Requiring Human Judgment

  • Layoff or termination communications - Too sensitive for AI
  • Legal or compliance content - Needs expert review
  • Highly personal feedback - Requires genuine human care
  • Crisis communications - Stakes too high
  • Salary or promotion discussions - Requires human touch
  • Content about specific people - Risk of inaccuracy

Tasks AI Struggles With

  • Nuanced cultural context - AI may miss subtlety
  • Company-specific jargon - AI doesn't know your abbreviations
  • Recent events - Training cutoffs limit knowledge
  • Highly technical accuracy - AI confidently makes mistakes
  • Sarcasm or subtle humor - Often misses the mark

Common AI Writing Mistakes

Mistake 1: Over-Formality

AI writes: "I am writing to inform you that..."

Fix: Replace with natural phrasing: "Quick update on..."

Mistake 2: Hedge Words

AI writes: "It might be potentially beneficial to perhaps consider..."

Fix: Be direct: "I recommend..."

Mistake 3: Hollow Phrases

AI writes: "In today's fast-paced world..."

Fix: Delete or replace with specific context

Mistake 4: Excessive Structure

AI writes: "Firstly... Secondly... Thirdly..."

Fix: Vary sentence structure, remove unnecessary markers

Mistake 5: Generic Examples

AI writes: "For example, Company XYZ..."

Fix: Replace with real, specific examples

Tool-Specific Tips

ChatGPT/Claude

  • Use system prompts to set context
  • Iterate with follow-up requests
  • Ask for multiple versions
  • Request specific changes, not vague "improve"

Grammarly

  • Good for grammar, punctuation, clarity
  • Be skeptical of tone suggestions
  • Disable suggestions that change your voice
  • Use as final polish, not primary drafting

GitHub Copilot (for Documentation)

  • Good for code comments and docstrings
  • Verify technical accuracy carefully
  • Adjust for your team's style
  • Use for boilerplate, edit the substance

References

For detailed guidance, see:

  • references/ai-prompt-patterns.md - Comprehensive prompt templates by use case
  • references/voice-preservation.md - Techniques for maintaining authenticity

Related Commands

  • /soft-skills:draft-email - Generate professional emails
  • /soft-skills:craft-linkedin-post - Create engaging posts
  • /soft-skills:feedback-conversations - Structure feedback using SBI

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Sending AI output without reading it
  • Using AI for highly sensitive content
  • Trusting AI facts without verification
  • Letting AI override your authentic voice
  • Over-relying on AI for tasks you should learn
  • Copy-pasting prompts without customization

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release

Last Updated

Date: 2025-12-26 Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Antigravity

27.75%
按下载量换算46

Claude Code

22.64%
按下载量换算38

Gemini CLI

17.3%
按下载量换算29

OpenCode

11.13%
按下载量换算18

Codex

6.73%
按下载量换算11

windsurf

3.3%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills