Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

ai-llm-inferenceAI LLM inference 命令行

Agent Skill

ai-llm-inference 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,375

周安装

97

GitHub Stars

59

下载量

768
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-llm-inference(AI LLM inference 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public
仓库路径:skills/ai-llm-inference
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill ai-llm-inference
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill ai-llm-inference

简介

AI LLM inference 聚焦于现代推理优化与生产部署最佳实践,涵盖 SLO、延迟、缓存与调度策略。

  • 适合高并发、低延迟场景下的模型服务设计,如实时问答、流式响应与批量推理系统。
  • 提供 vLLM、FlashAttention、KV-cache 等关键技术选型建议与性能调优路径。
  • 可通过命令行集成到 Codex、Claude 等宿主环境,依赖 OpenAI 等外部 API 时需配置密钥。
  • 使用时应关注 token 成本、批处理效率与容错机制,避免因配置不当导致服务降级。

SKILL.md

LLMOps - Inference & Optimization - Production Skill Hub

Modern Best Practices (January 2026):

This skill provides production-ready operational patterns for optimizing LLM inference performance, cost, and reliability. It centralizes decision rules, optimization strategies, configuration templates, and operational checklists for inference workloads.

No theory. No narrative. Only what Codex can execute.


When to Use This Skill

Codex should activate this skill whenever the user asks for:

  • Optimizing LLM inference latency or throughput
  • Choosing quantization strategies (FP8/FP4/INT8/INT4)
  • Configuring vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, or DeepSpeed inference
  • Scaling LLM inference across GPUs (tensor/pipeline parallelism)
  • Building high-throughput LLM APIs
  • Improving context window performance (KV cache optimization)
  • Using speculative decoding for faster generation
  • Reducing cost per token
  • Profiling and benchmarking inference workloads
  • Planning infrastructure capacity
  • CPU/edge deployment patterns
  • High availability and resilience patterns

Scope Boundaries (Use These Skills for Depth)


Quick Reference

TaskTool/FrameworkCommand/PatternWhen to Use
Latency budgetSLO + load modelTTFT/ITL + P95/P99 under loadAny production endpoint
Tail-latency controlScheduling + timeoutsAdmission control + queue caps + backpressurePrevent p99 explosions
ThroughputBatching + KV-cache aware servingContinuous batching + KV pagingHigh concurrency serving
Cost controlModel tiering + cachingCache (prefix/response) + quotasReduce spend and overload risk
Long contextPrefill optimizationChunked prefill + prompt compressionLong inputs and RAG-heavy apps
ParallelismTP/PP/DPChoose by model size and interconnectModels that do not fit one device
ReliabilityResilience patternsTimeouts + circuit breakers + idempotencyAvoid cascading failures

Decision Tree: Inference Optimization Strategy

Need to optimize LLM inference: [Optimization Path]
    │
    ├─ High throughput (>10k tok/s) OR P99 variance > 3x P50?
    │   └─ YES -> Disaggregated inference (prefill/decode separation)
    │            See references/disaggregated-inference.md
    │
    ├─ Primary constraint: Throughput?
    │   ├─ Many concurrent users? -> batching + KV-cache aware serving + admission control
    │   ├─ Chat/agents with KV reuse? -> SGLang (RadixAttention)
    │   └─ Mostly batch/offline? -> batch inference jobs + large batches + spot capacity
    │
    ├─ Primary constraint: Cost?
    │   ├─ Can accept lower quality tier? -> model tiering (small/medium/large router)
    │   └─ Must keep quality? -> caching + prompt/context reduction before quantization
    │
    ├─ Primary constraint: Latency?
    │   ├─ Draft model acceptable? -> speculative decoding
    │   └─ Long context? -> prefill optimizations + FlashAttention-3 + context budgets
    │
    ├─ Large model (>70B)?
    │   ├─ Multiple GPUs? -> Tensor parallelism (NVLink required)
    │   └─ Deep model? -> Pipeline parallelism (minimize bubbles)
    │
    ├─ Hardware selection?
    │   ├─ Memory-bound? -> more HBM, higher bandwidth
    │   ├─ Latency-bound? -> faster clocks + kernel support
    │   └─ Multi-node? -> prioritize interconnect (NVLink/RDMA) and topology
    │
    │   Notes: treat GPU/SKU advice as time-sensitive; verify with vendor docs and your own benchmarks.
    │   See references/gpu-optimization-checklists.md and references/infrastructure-tuning.md
    │
    └─ Edge deployment?
        └─ CPU + quantization -> llama.cpp/GGUF for constrained resources

Intake Checklist (REQUIRED)

Before recommending changes, collect (or infer) these inputs:

  • Model + variant (size, context length, precision/quantization, tokenizer)
  • Traffic shape (prompt/output length distributions, concurrency, QPS, streaming vs non-streaming)
  • SLOs and budgets (TTFT/ITL/total latency targets, error budget, cost per request)
  • Serving stack (engine/version, batching/scheduling settings, caching, parallelism, autoscaling)
  • Hardware and topology (GPU type/count, VRAM, NVLink/RDMA, CPU/RAM, storage, cluster/runtime)
  • Constraints (quality floor, safety requirements, rollout/rollback constraints)

Core Concepts & Practices

Core Concepts (Vendor-Agnostic)

  • Latency components: queueing + prefill + decode; optimize the largest contributor first.
  • Tail latency: p99 is dominated by queuing and long prompts; fix with admission control and context budgets.
  • Retries: retries can multiply load; bound retries and use hedged requests only with strict budgets.
  • Caching: prefix caching helps repeated system/tool scaffolds; response caching helps repeated questions (requires invalidation).
  • Security & privacy: prompts/outputs can contain sensitive data; scrub logs, enforce auth/tenancy, and rate-limit abuse (OWASP LLM Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/).

Implementation Practices (Tooling Examples)

  • Measure under load: benchmark TTFT/ITL and p95/p99 with realistic concurrency and prompt lengths.
  • Separate environments: dev/stage/prod model configs; promote only after passing the inference review checklist.
  • Export telemetry: request-level tokens, TTFT/ITL, queue depth, GPU memory headroom, and error classes (OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/gen-ai/).

Do / Avoid

Do

  • Do enforce max_input_tokens and max_output_tokens at the API boundary.
  • Do cap concurrency and queue depth; return overload errors quickly.
  • Do validate quality after any quantization or kernel change.

Avoid

  • Avoid unbounded retries (amplifies outages).
  • Avoid unbounded context windows (OOM + latency spikes).
  • Avoid benchmarking on single requests; always test with realistic concurrency.

Accuracy Protocol (REQUIRED)

  • Treat performance ratios (for example, "2x faster") as hypotheses unless a source is cited and the workload is comparable.
  • Do not recommend hardware/SKU changes without stating assumptions (model size, context length, concurrency, interconnect).
  • Prefer a measured baseline + checklist-driven rollout over "best practice" claims.

Resources (Detailed Operational Guides)

For comprehensive guides on specific topics, see:

Infrastructure & Serving

Performance Optimization

Deployment & Operations

Cost & Routing


Templates

Inference Configs

Production-ready configuration templates for leading inference engines:

Quantization & Compression

Model compression templates for reducing memory and cost:

Serving Pipelines

High-throughput serving architectures:

Caching & Batching

Performance optimization templates:

Benchmarking

Performance measurement and validation:

Checklists

Navigation

Resources

Templates

Data


Trend Awareness Protocol

IMPORTANT: When users ask recommendation questions about LLM inference, you MUST use WebSearch to check current trends before answering.

Trigger Conditions

  • "What's the best inference engine for [use case]?"
  • "What should I use for [serving/quantization/batching]?"
  • "What's the latest in LLM inference optimization?"
  • "Current best practices for [vLLM/TensorRT/quantization]?"
  • "Is [inference tool] still relevant in 2026?"
  • "[vLLM] vs [TensorRT-LLM] vs [SGLang]?"
  • "Best quantization method for [model size]?"
  • "What GPU should I use for inference?"

Required Searches

  1. Search: "LLM inference optimization best practices 2026"
  2. Search: "[vLLM/TensorRT-LLM/SGLang] comparison 2026"
  3. Search: "LLM quantization trends January 2026"
  4. Search: "LLM serving new releases 2026"

What to Report

After searching, provide:

  • Current landscape: What serving engines are popular NOW (not 6 months ago)
  • Emerging trends: New inference optimizations gaining traction
  • Deprecated/declining: Techniques or tools losing relevance
  • Recommendation: Based on fresh data, not just static knowledge

Example Topics (verify with fresh search)

  • Inference engines (vLLM 0.7+, TensorRT-LLM, SGLang, llama.cpp)
  • Quantization methods (FP8, AWQ, GPTQ, GGUF, bitsandbytes)
  • Attention kernels (FlashAttention-3, FlashInfer, xFormers)
  • Speculative decoding advances
  • KV cache optimization techniques
  • New GPU architectures (H200, Blackwell) and their optimizations

Related Skills

This skill focuses on inference-time performance. For related workflows:

  • See "Scope Boundaries" above.

External Resources

See data/sources.json for:

  • Serving frameworks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, DeepSpeed-MII)
  • Quantization libraries (GPTQ, AWQ, bitsandbytes, LLM Compressor)
  • FlashAttention, FlashInfer, xFormers
  • GPU hardware guides and optimization docs
  • Benchmarking frameworks and tools

Use this skill whenever the user needs LLM inference performance, cost reduction, or serving architecture guidance.

Fact-Checking

  • Use web search/web fetch to verify current external facts, versions, pricing, deadlines, regulations, or platform behavior before final answers.
  • Prefer primary sources; report source links and dates for volatile information.
  • If web access is unavailable, state the limitation and mark guidance as unverified.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.08%
按下载量换算208

Cursor

22.04%
按下载量换算169

Gemini CLI

17.18%
按下载量换算132

Antigravity

12.13%
按下载量换算93

Codex

8.08%
按下载量换算62

trae

3.65%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills