Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

agentic-quality-engineeringAgent 质量工程

Agent Skill

agentic-quality-engineering 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,027

周安装

82

GitHub Stars

329

下载量

636
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agentic-quality-engineering(Agent 质量工程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/agentic-quality-engineering
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill agentic-quality-engineering
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill agentic-quality-engineering

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。
  • 提供基于 PACT 原则的 Agentic QE 实施框架与质量门控机制。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill agentic-quality-engineering。
  • 注意权限范围、维护状态,避免触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

SKILL.md

Agentic Quality Engineering

<default_to_action> When implementing agentic QE or coordinating agents:

  1. SPAWN appropriate agent(s) for the task using Task tool with agent type
  2. CONFIGURE agent coordination (hierarchical/mesh/sequential)
  3. EXECUTE with PACT principles: Proactive analysis, Autonomous operation, Collaborative feedback, Targeted risk focus
  4. VALIDATE results through quality gates before deployment
  5. LEARN from outcomes - store patterns in aqe/learning/* namespace

Quick Agent Selection:

  • Test generation needed → qe-test-generator
  • Coverage gaps → qe-coverage-analyzer
  • Quality decision → qe-quality-gate
  • Security scan → qe-security-scanner
  • Performance test → qe-performance-tester
  • Full pipeline → qe-fleet-commander

Critical Success Factors:

  • Agents amplify human expertise, not replace it
  • Human-in-the-loop for critical decisions
  • Measure: bugs caught, time saved, coverage improved </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Designing autonomous testing systems
  • Scaling QE with intelligent agents
  • Implementing multi-agent coordination
  • Building CI/CD quality pipelines

PACT Principles

PrincipleAgent BehaviorHuman Role
ProactiveAnalyze pre-merge, predict riskSet guardrails
AutonomousExecute tests, fix flaky testsReview critical
CollaborativeMulti-agent coordinationProvide context
TargetedRisk-based prioritizationDefine risk areas

19-Agent Fleet

CategoryAgentsPrimary Use
Core Testing (5)test-generator, test-executor, coverage-analyzer, quality-gate, quality-analyzerDaily testing
Performance/Security (2)performance-tester, security-scannerNon-functional
Strategic (3)requirements-validator, production-intelligence, fleet-commanderPlanning
Advanced (4)regression-risk-analyzer, test-data-architect, api-contract-validator, flaky-test-hunterSpecialized
Visual/Chaos (2)visual-tester, chaos-engineerEdge cases
Deployment (1)deployment-readinessRelease
Analysis (1)code-complexityMaintainability

Coordination Patterns

Hierarchical: fleet-commander → [generators] → [executors] → quality-gate
Mesh: test-gen ↔ coverage ↔ quality (peer decisions)
Sequential: risk-analyzer → test-gen → executor → coverage → gate

Success Criteria

✅ 10x deployment frequency with same/better quality ✅ Coverage gaps detected in real-time ✅ Bugs caught pre-production ❌ Agents acting without human oversight on critical decisions ❌ Deploying all 19 agents at once (start with 1-2)


Core Concepts

QE Evolution

StageApproachLimitation
TraditionalManual everythingHuman bottleneck
AutomationScripts + fixed scenariosNeeds orchestration
AgenticAI agents + human judgmentRequires trust-building

Core Premise: Agents amplify human expertise for 10x scale.

Key Capabilities

1. Intelligent Test Generation

// Agent analyzes code change, generates targeted tests
const tests = await qeTestGenerator.generate(prDiff);
// → Happy path, edge cases, error handling tests

2. Pattern Detection - Scan logs, find anomalies, correlate errors

3. Adaptive Strategy - Adjust test focus based on risk signals

4. Root Cause Analysis - Link failures to code changes, suggest fixes


Agent Coordination

Memory Namespaces

aqe/test-plan/*     - Test planning decisions
aqe/coverage/*      - Coverage analysis results
aqe/quality/*       - Quality metrics and gates
aqe/learning/*      - Patterns and Q-values
aqe/coordination/*  - Cross-agent state

Memory Operations (MCP Tools)

CRITICAL: Always use aqe memory store with persist: true for learnings.

1. Store data to persistent memory:

// Store test plan decisions (persisted to .agentic-qe/memory.db)
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/test-plan/pr-123" \
  --namespace "aqe/test-plan" \
  --value '{...}' \
  --json

2. Retrieve prior learnings before task:

// Query patterns before starting test generation
const priorData = await aqe memory get --key "aqe/learning/patterns/test-generation/*" --namespace "aqe/learning" --json

// Use patterns to guide current task
if (priorData.success) {
  console.log(`Loaded ${priorData.patterns.length} prior patterns`);
}

3. Store coverage analysis results:

aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coverage/auth-module" \
  --namespace "aqe/coverage" \
  --value '{...}' \
  --json

Three-Phase Memory Protocol

For coordinated multi-agent tasks, use the STATUS → PROGRESS → COMPLETE pattern:

// PHASE 1: STATUS - Task starting
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coordination/task-123/status" \
  --namespace "aqe/coordination" \
  --value '{...}' \
  --json

// PHASE 2: PROGRESS - Intermediate updates
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coordination/task-123/progress" \
  --namespace "aqe/coordination" \
  --value '{...}' \
  --json

// PHASE 3: COMPLETE - Task finished
aqe memory store \
  --key "aqe/coordination/task-123/complete" \
  --namespace "aqe/coordination" \
  --value '{...}' \
  --json

Blackboard Events

EventTriggerSubscribers
test:generatedNew tests createdexecutor, coverage
coverage:gapGap detectedtest-generator
quality:decisionGate evaluatedfleet-commander
security:findingVulnerability foundquality-gate

Example: PR Quality Pipeline

// 1. Risk analysis
const risks = await Task("Analyze PR", prDiff, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");

// 2. Generate tests for risks
const tests = await Task("Generate tests", risks, "qe-test-generator");

// 3. Execute + analyze
const results = await Task("Run tests", tests, "qe-test-executor");
const coverage = await Task("Check coverage", results, "qe-coverage-analyzer");

// 4. Quality decision
const decision = await Task("Evaluate", {results, coverage}, "qe-quality-gate");
// → GO/NO-GO with rationale

Implementation Phases

PhaseDurationGoalAgent(s)
ExperimentWeeks 1-4Validate one use case1 agent
IntegrateMonths 2-3CI/CD pipeline3-4 agents
ScaleMonths 4-6Multiple use cases8+ agents
EvolveOngoingContinuous learningFull fleet

Phase 1 Example

# Week 1: Deploy single agent
aqe agent spawn qe-test-generator

# Weeks 2-3: Generate tests for 10 PRs
# Track: bugs found, test quality, review time

# Week 4: Measure impact
aqe agent metrics qe-test-generator
# → Tests: 150, Bugs: 12, Time saved: 8h

Limitations & Strengths

Agents Excel At

  • Volume: Scan thousands of logs in seconds
  • Patterns: Find correlations humans miss
  • Tireless: 24/7 testing and monitoring
  • Speed: Instant code change analysis

Agents Need Humans For

  • Business context and priorities
  • Ethical judgment and trade-offs
  • Creative exploration ("what if" scenarios)
  • Domain expertise (healthcare, finance, legal)

Best Practices

DoDon't
Start with one agent, one use caseDeploy all 18 at once
Build feedback loops earlyDeploy and forget
Human reviews agent outputAuto-merge without review
Measure bugs caught, time savedTrack vanity metrics (test count)
Build trust graduallyGive full autonomy immediately

Trust Progression

Month 1: Agent suggests → Human decides
Month 2: Agent acts → Human reviews after
Month 3: Agent autonomous on low-risk
Month 4: Agent handles critical with oversight

Agent Coordination Hints

coordination:
  topology: hierarchical
  commander: qe-fleet-commander
  memory_namespace: aqe/coordination
  blackboard_topic: qe-fleet

preload_skills:
  - agentic-quality-engineering  # Always (this skill)
  - risk-based-testing           # For prioritization
  - quality-metrics              # For measurement

agent_assignments:
  qe-test-generator: [api-testing-patterns, tdd-london-chicago]
  qe-coverage-analyzer: [quality-metrics, risk-based-testing]
  qe-security-scanner: [security-testing, risk-based-testing]
  qe-performance-tester: [performance-testing]

Related Skills

  • holistic-testing-pact - PACT principles deep dive
  • risk-based-testing - Prioritize agent focus
  • quality-metrics - Measure agent effectiveness
  • api-testing-patterns, security-testing, performance-testing - Specialized testing

Resources

  • Agent definitions: .claude/agents/
  • CLI: aqe agent --help
  • Fleet status: aqe fleet status

Success Metric: Deploy 10x more frequently with same or better quality through intelligent agent collaboration.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.24%
按下载量换算180

Antigravity

21.16%
按下载量换算135

windsurf

16.54%
按下载量换算105

github-copilot

12.72%
按下载量换算81

Codex

7.39%
按下载量换算47

trae

2.75%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill agentic-quality-engineering;npx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill "agentic-quality-engineering" 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills