Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发执行命令clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

agent-scorecardAgent 记分卡

Agent Skill

agent-scorecard 用于补充开发相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接开发相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

13,195

周安装

561

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

4,623
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-scorecard(Agent 记分卡)
来源仓库:https://github.com/theshadowrose/agent-scorecard
安装命令:
openclaw skills install agent-scorecard
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install agent-scorecard

简介

对代理输出质量进行可配置评估,跟踪长期性能变化。

  • 适用于需要量化代理产出标准的开发与维护场景。
  • 支持自定义评分维度,无需调用外部 API 即可完成评估。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install agent-scorecard,基于 clawhub 分发。
  • 评估结果依赖预设模式匹配,可能存在主观偏差。

SKILL.md

name
Agent Scorecard Output Quality Framework
description
Configurable quality evaluation for AI agent outputs. Define criteria, run evaluations, track quality over time. No LLM-as-judge, no API calls, pattern-based automated checks.
author
@TheShadowRose
version
1.0.5
tags
["quality", "evaluation", "scoring", "agent-monitoring", "output-quality", "metrics"]
license
MIT

Agent Scorecard Output Quality Framework

Configurable quality evaluation for AI agent outputs. Define criteria, run evaluations, track quality over time. No LLM-as-judge, no API calls, pattern-based automated checks.


Configurable quality evaluation for AI agent outputs. Define criteria, run evaluations, track quality over time.

Agent Scorecard gives you a structured, repeatable way to measure whether your AI agent is producing good output — and whether it's getting better or worse over time. No LLM-as-judge, no API calls, no external dependencies. Everything runs locally with pattern-based automated checks and optional human scoring.


The Problem

You changed your agent's system prompt. Is the output better now? You don't know. You added a new tool. Did response quality degrade? You have a feeling, but no data. Quality management for AI agents is mostly vibes.

Agent Scorecard replaces vibes with numbers.

What It Does

1. Define Quality Dimensions (config_example.json)

  • Configure what "quality" means for your use case
  • Set dimensions: accuracy, completeness, tone, format compliance, consistency — or your own
  • Define rubrics (what does a 1 vs a 5 look like for each dimension?)
  • Set weights (accuracy matters more than tone? Give it 2× weight)
  • Set pass/fail thresholds per dimension

2. Evaluate (scorecard.py)

  • Automated mode: Pattern-based checks run instantly with zero API calls

- Response length analysis (too short? too long?) - Format compliance (expected headers, lists, code blocks present?) - Sycophancy detection ("Great question!" markers) - Filler/hedge word density ("basically", "perhaps", "I think") - Required section verification - Style consistency (sentence length variation)

  • Manual mode: Interactive rubric-guided human scoring
  • Blended mode: Combine auto scores with human judgment (averaged)
  • Aggregate scoring with configurable method (weighted average, minimum, geometric mean)

3. Track (scorecard_track.py)

  • Append every evaluation to a JSONL history file
  • Filter by agent, task type, time period
  • Compute trends per dimension (improving, degrading, stable)
  • Linear regression slope for quantified direction
  • Sparkline visualisations in terminal

4. Compare (scorecard_track.py)

  • Before/after comparison (last N evals vs previous N)
  • Per-dimension delta with direction indicators
  • Perfect for measuring the impact of config changes

5. Report (scorecard_report.py)

  • Single evaluation reports (markdown or JSON)
  • History summary reports with tables and sparklines
  • Per-dimension breakdowns with rubric reference
  • Export to files or stdout

Quick Start

# 1. Configure
cp config_example.json scorecard_config.json
# Edit dimensions, thresholds, and weights for your use case

# 2. Evaluate a response
python3 scorecard.py --config scorecard_config.json --input response.txt

# 3. Evaluate and save to history
python3 scorecard.py --config scorecard_config.json --input response.txt --save history.jsonl

# 4. Manual scoring mode
python3 scorecard.py --config scorecard_config.json --input response.txt --manual --save history.jsonl

# 5. View trends
python3 scorecard_track.py --history history.jsonl --summary

# 6. Compare before/after (last 10 vs previous 10)
python3 scorecard_track.py --history history.jsonl --compare 10

# 7. Generate a report
python3 scorecard_report.py --config scorecard_config.json --history history.jsonl

Programmatic Usage

from scorecard import Scorecard, _load_config

cfg = _load_config("scorecard_config.json")
sc = Scorecard(cfg)

text = open("agent_response.txt").read()
result = sc.evaluate(text, agent="my-agent", task_type="code-review")

print(result.summary())
# Overall: 3.85/5 (PASS)
#   ✓ Accuracy: 4.0/5 (threshold 3, weight 2.0) [auto]
#   ✓ Completeness: 3.5/5 (threshold 3, weight 1.5) [auto]
#   ...

# Save for tracking
import json
with open("history.jsonl", "a") as f:
    f.write(json.dumps(result.to_dict()) + "\
")

Use Cases

  • Prompt engineering: Measure whether prompt changes improve output quality
  • Model comparison: Same task, different models — which scores higher?
  • Agent regression testing: Catch quality degradation before it ships
  • Team quality standards: Define shared rubrics for consistent evaluation
  • Continuous monitoring: Track quality trends over days/weeks/months
  • A/B testing: Quantified before/after comparisons

What's Included

FilePurpose
scorecard.pyMain evaluation engine — define, evaluate, score
scorecard_track.pyHistorical tracking and trend analysis
scorecard_report.pyReport generation (markdown, JSON)
config_example.jsonFull configuration template with all tunables
LIMITATIONS.mdWhat this tool doesn't do
LICENSEMIT License

Requirements

  • Python 3.8+
  • No external dependencies (stdlib only)
  • Works on any OS
  • Platform-agnostic (works with any AI agent framework)

Configuration

See config_example.json for the complete reference. Key areas:

  • DIMENSIONS — Quality dimensions with rubrics, weights, thresholds, and auto-checks
  • AUTO_CHECKS — Tuning for each pattern-based check (markers, thresholds, penalties)
  • AGGREGATE_METHOD — How to combine dimension scores ("weighted_average", "minimum", "geometric_mean")
  • HISTORY_FILE — Where to store evaluation history
  • REPORT_OUTPUT_DIR — Where reports are saved

quality-verified

License

MIT — See LICENSE file.


⚠️ Security Note — Config File

Configuration is loaded from a JSON file. This is safe to share — no code execution.

  • Config path is validated for existence and size (1MB cap) before loading
  • Must be a .json file — raises ValueError if given a non-JSON path
  • Keep your config under version control; it defines your quality rubrics and scoring weights

⚠️ Disclaimer

This software is provided "AS IS", without warranty of any kind, express or implied.

USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.

  • The author(s) are NOT liable for any damages, losses, or consequences arising from

the use or misuse of this software — including but not limited to financial loss, data loss, security breaches, business interruption, or any indirect/consequential damages.

  • This software does NOT constitute financial, legal, trading, or professional advice.
  • Users are solely responsible for evaluating whether this software is suitable for

their use case, environment, and risk tolerance.

  • No guarantee is made regarding accuracy, reliability, completeness, or fitness

for any particular purpose.

  • The author(s) are not responsible for how third parties use, modify, or distribute

this software after purchase.

By downloading, installing, or using this software, you acknowledge that you have read this disclaimer and agree to use the software entirely at your own risk.

DATA DISCLAIMER: This software processes and stores data locally on your system. The author(s) are not responsible for data loss, corruption, or unauthorized access resulting from software bugs, system failures, or user error. Always maintain independent backups of important data. This software does not transmit data externally unless explicitly configured by the user.


Support & Links

🐛 Bug ReportsTheShadowyRose@proton.me
Ko-fiko-fi.com/theshadowrose
🛒 Gumroadshadowyrose.gumroad.com
🐦 Twitter@TheShadowyRose
🐙 GitHubgithub.com/TheShadowRose
🧠 PromptBasepromptbase.com/profile/shadowrose

*Built with OpenClaw — thank you for making this possible.*


🛠️ Need something custom? Custom OpenClaw agents & skills starting at $500. If you can describe it, I can build it. → Hire me on Fiverr

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

88.94%
按下载量换算4,112

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 openclaw skills install agent-scorecard 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills