Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

afrexai-vendor-riskafrexai 供应商风险

Agent Skill

afrexai-vendor-risk 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

15,923

周安装

659

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

5,430
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-vendor-risk(afrexai 供应商风险)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-vendor-risk
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-vendor-risk
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-vendor-risk

简介

在安全、财务、合规性、运营和数据处理方面对供应商进行评估和评分,以对风险进行分类并有效管理补救计划。

SKILL.md

Vendor Risk Assessment

Score and manage third-party vendor risk across security, financial stability, compliance, operational dependency, and data handling. Built for procurement teams, CISOs, and operations leaders managing 10+ vendors.

Usage

Run this assessment for each critical vendor. Aggregate scores into a portfolio risk view.

Assessment Framework

1. Vendor Risk Scorecard (5 Domains, 0-100 each)

Security Posture (0-100)

  • SOC 2 Type II current? (+20)
  • Penetration test within 12 months? (+15)
  • Incident response plan documented? (+15)
  • Data encryption at rest and transit? (+15)
  • MFA enforced for all access? (+10)
  • Security questionnaire completed? (+10)
  • Subprocessor list disclosed? (+15)

Financial Stability (0-100)

  • Revenue trend (growing +25, flat +10, declining 0)
  • Funding runway >18 months? (+20)
  • Customer concentration <20%? (+15)
  • Public financials or audited statements? (+15)
  • No material litigation? (+15)
  • Credit rating acceptable? (+10)

Compliance & Regulatory (0-100)

  • Industry certifications current? (+20)
  • GDPR/CCPA compliant? (+20)
  • Data processing agreement signed? (+15)
  • Regulatory audit history clean? (+15)
  • Right to audit clause? (+15)
  • Data residency requirements met? (+15)

Operational Dependency (0-100)

  • SLA with financial penalties? (+20)
  • Uptime >99.9% trailing 12 months? (+20)
  • Disaster recovery tested annually? (+15)
  • Single point of failure for your business? (-20)
  • Migration plan documented? (+15)
  • API/export capability? (+15)
  • Vendor lock-in risk assessment? (+15)

Data Handling (0-100)

  • Data classification documented? (+20)
  • Retention/deletion policies clear? (+20)
  • Breach notification <72 hours? (+20)
  • Data portability guaranteed? (+15)
  • AI/ML training on your data? (opt-out available +15, no opt-out -10)
  • Access logging and audit trail? (+10)

2. Risk Tier Classification

Aggregate ScoreTierReview CadenceAction
400-500Low RiskAnnualStandard monitoring
300-399ModerateSemi-annualRemediation plan required
200-299High RiskQuarterlyExecutive escalation, alternatives identified
0-199CriticalMonthlyExit plan required within 90 days

3. Portfolio Risk View

Total vendors: ___
Critical tier: ___ (target: 0)
High risk: ___ (target: <10%)
Moderate: ___ (target: <30%)
Low risk: ___ (target: >60%)

Top 3 concentration risks:
1. [Vendor] — [function] — [% of operations dependent]
2. [Vendor] — [function] — [% of operations dependent]
3. [Vendor] — [function] — [% of operations dependent]

Annual vendor spend: $___
Spend on high/critical vendors: $___  (___%)

4. Cost of Vendor Failure

Impact AreaCalculation
Revenue lossDaily revenue × expected downtime days
Recovery costMigration estimate + emergency procurement
Compliance penaltyRegulatory fine range for data breach via vendor
Reputation damageCustomer churn rate × LTV × affected customers
Operational disruptionStaff idle cost × recovery period

5. Quarterly Review Template

  • Score changes since last review (flag any >10 point drops)
  • New subprocessors added by vendor
  • SLA performance vs target
  • Security incidents or near-misses
  • Contract renewal timeline and negotiation leverage
  • Alternative vendor benchmarking

6. Red Flags (Immediate Action)

  • Vendor acquired by competitor
  • Key personnel departures (CISO, CTO)
  • Downtime exceeding SLA 2+ months
  • Regulatory action or investigation
  • Refusal to complete security questionnaire
  • Data breach affecting other customers
  • Sudden pricing changes >20%

Industry-Specific Vendor Risks

IndustryCritical Vendor CategorySpecific Risk
HealthcareEHR, billing, telehealthHIPAA BAA gaps, PHI exposure
Financial ServicesCore banking, payments, KYCPCI DSS, regulatory reporting
LegalCase management, ediscoveryPrivilege breach, client data
SaaSInfrastructure, auth, paymentsCascading outages, PII
ManufacturingMES, supply chain, IoTIP theft, production stoppage
ConstructionProject management, safetyCompliance documentation gaps
EcommercePayments, fulfillment, CDNPCI, availability during peak
RecruitmentATS, background check, payrollCandidate PII, bias in AI screening
Real EstateMLS, transaction mgmt, titleWire fraud, closing delays
Professional ServicesCRM, billing, document mgmtClient confidentiality breach

Get the Full Playbook

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

78.16%
按下载量换算4,244

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills