Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-serviceclawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

afrexai-soc2-complianceafrexai soc2 合规性

Agent Skill

afrexai-soc2-compliance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

18,960

周安装

798

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

6,639
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-soc2-compliance(afrexai soc2 合规性)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-soc2-compliance
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-soc2-compliance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-soc2-compliance

简介

通过差距分析、控制实施、证据收集、审计准备和持续监控,指导组织完成 SOC 2 合规生命周期。

SKILL.md

SOC 2 Compliance Accelerator

Your agent for achieving and maintaining SOC 2 Type I and Type II compliance — from readiness assessment through audit completion.

What This Does

Guides organizations through the full SOC 2 lifecycle: gap analysis, control implementation, evidence collection, audit prep, and continuous monitoring. Covers all 5 Trust Service Criteria with practical implementation steps.

How to Use

Tell your agent what stage you're at:

  • "Run SOC 2 readiness assessment" — 64-point gap analysis across all Trust Service Criteria
  • "Build SOC 2 control matrix" — Maps controls to criteria with ownership and evidence requirements
  • "Create SOC 2 evidence collection plan" — Automated and manual evidence gathering schedule
  • "Prepare for SOC 2 audit" — Auditor-ready documentation package checklist
  • "SOC 2 continuous monitoring dashboard" — Ongoing compliance tracking after certification

Trust Service Criteria Coverage

CC — Common Criteria (Security) — Required

  • CC1: Control Environment (tone at top, org structure, accountability)
  • CC2: Communication & Information (internal/external, system boundaries)
  • CC3: Risk Assessment (risk identification, fraud risk, change impact)
  • CC4: Monitoring Activities (ongoing evaluations, deficiency reporting)
  • CC5: Control Activities (policies, technology controls, deployment)
  • CC6: Logical & Physical Access (access management, authentication, physical security)
  • CC7: System Operations (vulnerability management, incident response, recovery)
  • CC8: Change Management (change authorization, testing, approval)
  • CC9: Risk Mitigation (vendor management, business continuity)

Optional Criteria

  • Availability (A1): Uptime SLAs, DR/BCP, capacity planning
  • Processing Integrity (PI1): Data accuracy, completeness, timeliness
  • Confidentiality (C1): Classification, encryption, retention, disposal
  • Privacy (P1): Notice, consent, collection, use, disclosure, access

Readiness Assessment Framework

Phase 1: Scoping (Week 1)

System Description Checklist:
□ Infrastructure components (cloud, on-prem, hybrid)
□ Software stack (applications, databases, middleware)
□ People (roles, responsibilities, third parties)
□ Procedures (operational, security, change management)
□ Data flows (ingress, processing, storage, egress)
□ Trust Service Criteria selection (Security + which optional?)
□ Subservice organizations (cloud providers, SaaS tools)
□ Carve-out vs inclusive method for subservice orgs

Phase 2: Gap Analysis (Weeks 2-3)

Score each control area 1-5:

  • 1 — Not Started: No policy, no process, no evidence
  • 2 — Ad Hoc: Informal processes exist but undocumented
  • 3 — Defined: Documented but inconsistent execution
  • 4 — Managed: Documented, executed, some evidence
  • 5 — Optimized: Automated, monitored, auditable evidence

Priority Matrix:

Gap ScoreActionTimeline
1-2Critical — implement immediately2-4 weeks
3Important — formalize and document1-2 weeks
4Minor — fill evidence gaps3-5 days
5Maintain — continue monitoringOngoing

Phase 3: Remediation (Weeks 3-10)

For each gap:
1. Assign control owner (by name, not role)
2. Define implementation steps
3. Set evidence collection method (automated preferred)
4. Establish testing cadence
5. Document exception handling process

Control Implementation Priorities

Must-Have Controls (Week 1-4)

  1. Access Management: SSO, MFA on all systems, quarterly access reviews
  2. Encryption: TLS 1.2+ in transit, AES-256 at rest, key management
  3. Logging: Centralized logging, 90-day retention minimum, tamper-evident
  4. Incident Response: Documented plan, defined roles, tested annually
  5. Change Management: Approval workflows, code review, deployment gates
  6. Vendor Management: Vendor inventory, risk assessments, SOC 2 reports from critical vendors
  7. Employee Security: Background checks, security awareness training, acceptable use policy
  8. Vulnerability Management: Regular scanning, patch cadence (critical <72hrs), penetration testing

Should-Have Controls (Week 4-8)

  1. Business Continuity: DR plan, RTO/RPO defined, tested semi-annually
  2. Data Classification: 4-tier model (Public, Internal, Confidential, Restricted)
  3. Network Security: Segmentation, IDS/IPS, WAF for web applications
  4. Endpoint Protection: EDR, device encryption, MDM for mobile

Nice-to-Have Controls (Week 8+)

  1. Security Metrics Dashboard: Real-time compliance posture
  2. Automated Compliance Monitoring: Continuous control testing
  3. Zero Trust Architecture: Beyond perimeter security

Evidence Collection Guide

Automated Evidence (Set Once, Collect Forever)

ControlEvidence SourceTool Examples
Access ReviewsIAM exportsOkta, Azure AD, AWS IAM
EncryptionConfig snapshotsAWS Config, CloudTrail
LoggingLog aggregationDatadog, Splunk, ELK
Vulnerability ScansScan reportsQualys, Nessus, Snyk
Change ManagementPR/deploy historyGitHub, GitLab, Jira
UptimeMonitoring dashboardsDatadog, PagerDuty

Manual Evidence (Scheduled Collection)

ControlEvidence TypeFrequency
Background ChecksHR recordsPer hire
Security TrainingCompletion certificatesAnnual
Risk AssessmentAssessment documentAnnual
Pen TestingReportAnnual
DR TestingTest resultsSemi-annual
Board/Mgmt ReviewMeeting minutesQuarterly
Vendor ReviewsAssessment recordsAnnual
Policy ReviewsVersion historyAnnual

Audit Timeline

Type I (Point-in-Time) — 8-12 weeks total

Week 1-2:   Auditor selection + engagement letter
Week 2-4:   System description draft
Week 4-6:   Control documentation + evidence prep
Week 6-8:   Fieldwork (auditor testing)
Week 8-10:  Draft report review
Week 10-12: Final report issued

Type II (Period of Time) — 3-12 month observation + 4-6 weeks fieldwork

Month 1:     Observation period begins (minimum 3 months, recommend 6-12)
Ongoing:     Evidence collection, control operation
Month 3-12:  Observation period ends
+Week 1-2:   Fieldwork scheduling
+Week 2-4:   Fieldwork (testing over observation period)
+Week 4-6:   Draft report + final report

Cost Framework

Company SizeType IType IIAnnual Maintenance
Startup (<50)$20K-$50K$30K-$80K$15K-$40K
Mid-Market (50-500)$40K-$100K$60K-$150K$30K-$80K
Enterprise (500+)$80K-$200K$120K-$300K$60K-$150K

Includes: auditor fees, tooling, personnel time, remediation costs.

Hidden costs to budget:

  • Compliance automation platform: $10K-$50K/year
  • Additional security tooling: $5K-$30K/year
  • Personnel time (internal): 200-800 hours
  • Policy/procedure writing (if outsourced): $5K-$20K

Common Audit Findings (Avoid These)

  1. Access not revoked within 24 hours of termination — #1 finding
  2. Missing or incomplete risk assessment — annual requirement
  3. No evidence of management review — need meeting minutes
  4. Incomplete vendor management — missing SOC reports from critical vendors
  5. Inconsistent change management — emergency changes without retroactive approval
  6. Security training gaps — new hires not trained within 30 days
  7. Logging gaps — not all in-scope systems sending to central logging

AI Agent SOC 2 Considerations (2026)

When deploying AI agents in SOC 2 environments:

  • Data boundaries: Agents must not access data outside their defined scope
  • Audit trail: All agent actions must be logged and attributable
  • Access controls: Agent service accounts need same rigor as human accounts
  • Model governance: Document which models process customer data
  • Prompt injection defense: Part of CC7 (system operations) controls
  • Output validation: Processing integrity controls for agent outputs

Industry-Specific Requirements

IndustryExtra CriteriaKey Controls
FintechAll 5 TSC typicalSOX mapping, encryption everywhere, PCI if payments
HealthcarePrivacy, ConfidentialityHIPAA crosswalk, BAAs, PHI handling
SaaSAvailability, ConfidentialityMulti-tenant isolation, SLA compliance
LegalConfidentiality, PrivacyPrivilege protection, matter isolation
ConstructionSecurity, AvailabilityField data protection, offline capability
E-commerceAll 5 TSC typicalPCI DSS alignment, transaction integrity

7 SOC 2 Mistakes That Cost Companies 6+ Months

  1. Starting with Type II — Get Type I first, prove controls work, then observe
  2. Scoping too broadly — Only include systems that touch customer data
  3. Choosing the wrong auditor — Pick one who knows your industry
  4. Manual evidence collection — Automate from day 1 or drown in spreadsheets
  5. Treating it as a project, not a program — SOC 2 is continuous
  6. Ignoring subservice organizations — Your cloud provider's SOC 2 matters
  7. No executive sponsor — Compliance without budget authority = failure

Get the Full Implementation Package

This skill gives you the framework. For industry-specific compliance playbooks with regulatory crosswalks, cost models, and vendor selection guides:

🔗 AfrexAI Context Packs — $47 per industry vertical

Available packs: Fintech, Healthcare, Legal, Construction, E-commerce, SaaS, Real Estate, Recruitment, Manufacturing, Professional Services

🔗 AI Revenue Leak Calculator — Find where compliance gaps cost you money

🔗 Agent Setup Wizard — Deploy compliance monitoring agents in minutes

Bundle pricing:

  • Pick 3 packs: $97
  • All 10 packs: $197
  • Everything bundle: $247

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.09%
按下载量换算5,649

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills