Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

afrexai-data-governanceAfrexai 数据治理

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

总安装

20,563

周安装

840

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

6,653
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-data-governance(Afrexai 数据治理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-data-governance
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance

简介

afrexai-data-governance 用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。

  • 它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常或生成统计口径。
  • 通过 openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance 命令安装。
  • 使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据时应先确认脱敏边界。
  • 适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Data Governance Framework

Assess, score, and remediate your organization's data governance posture across 6 domains.

What This Covers

  1. Data Quality — Completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness scoring
  2. Data Cataloging — Asset inventory, lineage tracking, metadata management
  3. Access Control — Role-based permissions, least privilege, data classification (public/internal/confidential/restricted)
  4. Compliance Mapping — GDPR, CCPA, SOX, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, industry-specific regulations
  5. Retention & Lifecycle — Retention policies, archival schedules, deletion procedures, legal hold
  6. AI/Agent Data Governance — Training data provenance, model input/output logging, bias detection, PII handling in agent workflows

How to Use

When asked to assess data governance:

  1. Ask which domains are priority (or assess all 6)
  2. For each domain, evaluate 8 controls on a 0-3 scale:

- 0 = Not implemented - 1 = Ad hoc / informal - 2 = Documented and partially enforced - 3 = Automated and continuously monitored

  1. Calculate domain score (sum / 24 × 100)
  2. Calculate overall governance score (average of domains)
  3. Generate remediation roadmap prioritized by risk

Scoring Interpretation

ScoreRatingAction
0-25%CriticalImmediate remediation — regulatory risk
26-50%Developing90-day improvement plan required
51-75%ManagedOptimize and automate weak areas
76-100%OptimizedMaintain and benchmark against peers

Domain 1: Data Quality Controls

  1. Data profiling automation (duplicate detection, format validation)
  2. Quality dashboards with SLA thresholds
  3. Root cause analysis for quality failures
  4. Stewardship program (assigned data owners per domain)
  5. Quality gates in data pipelines (reject bad data at ingestion)
  6. Business rule validation (domain-specific logic checks)
  7. Cross-system reconciliation (source vs target matching)
  8. Quality trend tracking (month-over-month improvement metrics)

Domain 2: Data Cataloging Controls

  1. Automated asset discovery (databases, APIs, files, SaaS)
  2. Business glossary with agreed definitions
  3. Data lineage tracking (source → transformation → consumption)
  4. Search and discovery interface for business users
  5. Metadata enrichment (tags, classifications, sensitivity labels)
  6. Catalog coverage tracking (% of assets documented)
  7. Usage analytics (who accesses what, how often)
  8. Integration with BI/analytics tools (catalog-aware queries)

Domain 3: Access Control

  1. Role-based access control (RBAC) with regular review
  2. Data classification enforcement (labels drive permissions)
  3. Least privilege principle (minimal default access)
  4. Access request and approval workflows
  5. Privileged access management (admin accounts monitored)
  6. Access certification (quarterly re-certification of permissions)
  7. Anomaly detection (unusual access patterns flagged)
  8. De-provisioning automation (access removed on role change/exit)

Domain 4: Compliance Mapping

  1. Regulation inventory (which laws apply, by geography and industry)
  2. Control-to-regulation mapping (which controls satisfy which requirements)
  3. Data processing records (Article 30 GDPR / equivalent)
  4. Consent management (capture, storage, withdrawal tracking)
  5. Data subject rights automation (access, deletion, portability)
  6. Cross-border transfer compliance (SCCs, adequacy decisions)
  7. Breach notification procedures (72-hour GDPR, state-specific)
  8. Regular compliance audits (internal + third-party)

Domain 5: Retention & Lifecycle

  1. Retention schedule by data type (contractual, regulatory, operational)
  2. Automated archival pipelines (hot → warm → cold → delete)
  3. Legal hold management (litigation preservation)
  4. Deletion verification (confirmed purge with audit trail)
  5. Storage cost optimization (tiered storage aligned to access patterns)
  6. Backup and recovery testing (regular restore drills)
  7. Data minimization enforcement (collect only what is needed)
  8. End-of-life procedures for decommissioned systems

Domain 6: AI/Agent Data Governance

  1. Training data provenance tracking (source, consent, bias review)
  2. Model input/output logging (what went in, what came out)
  3. PII detection and masking in agent workflows
  4. Hallucination monitoring (output accuracy validation)
  5. Agent decision audit trail (explainability for automated decisions)
  6. Data feedback loops (human review of agent data modifications)
  7. Vendor data sharing agreements (what third-party APIs see your data)
  8. Synthetic data policies (when and how to use generated data)

Cost of Poor Governance

RiskAverage CostPrevention Cost
GDPR fine$4.3M (average 2025)$45K-$120K/year
Data breach$4.88M (IBM 2025)$60K-$200K/year
Failed audit$150K-$500K remediation$30K-$80K/year
Bad data decisions15-25% revenue impact$20K-$60K/year
AI bias incident$2M-$50M (litigation + brand)$25K-$75K/year

Remediation Priority Matrix

Always fix in this order:

  1. Compliance gaps — regulatory fines are existential
  2. Access control — breaches destroy trust overnight
  3. AI governance — fastest-growing risk category
  4. Data quality — garbage in = garbage out at scale
  5. Cataloging — you cannot govern what you cannot find
  6. Retention — storage costs compound, legal risk accumulates

Industry Benchmarks (2026)

IndustryAvg Governance ScoreTop QuartileRegulatory Pressure
Financial Services68%85%+Extreme (SOX, PCI, GDPR)
Healthcare62%80%+High (HIPAA, FDA, state)
SaaS/Tech55%78%+Growing (SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA)
Manufacturing45%70%+Moderate (ITAR, ISO)
Retail/Ecommerce48%72%+Growing (PCI, CCPA, GDPR)

Next Steps

Need a complete data governance implementation tailored to your industry?

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.77%
按下载量换算5,041

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills