Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

ad-to-landing-page-auditor向着陆页审核员投放广告

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

192

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

630

下载量

64
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-to-landing-page-auditor(向着陆页审核员投放广告)
来源仓库:https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-to-landing-page-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor

简介

广告到着陆页审核员检查广告与着陆页之间的消息一致性,提高转化率。

  • 适用于需要审计广告到着陆页流程、检查消息匹配或提高转化率的场景。
  • 提供核心原则和具体使用步骤,帮助识别和解决广告与着陆页之间的不匹配问题。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor。
  • 使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

SKILL.md

Ad-to-Landing Page Auditor

The #1 reason ads get clicks but not conversions: the landing page doesn't deliver on the ad's promise. This skill audits the full click path — from ad copy to landing page experience — and flags every disconnect.

Core principle: A great ad with a mismatched landing page is worse than a mediocre ad with a matched one. Message match is the single biggest conversion lever most startups ignore.

When to Use

  • "Why are my ads getting clicks but no conversions?"
  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page flow"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "My conversion rate is low — help me figure out why"
  • "Review our landing pages for our ad campaigns"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Ad copy — For each ad, provide:

- Headline(s) - Body / description text - CTA text - Platform (Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn)

  1. Landing page URLs — The URL each ad points to
  2. Conversion goal — What should happen after someone clicks? (Demo / Trial / Purchase / Download)
  3. Known conversion rates? — Current click → conversion rate per ad/LP (if available)

If the user has a CSV export from their ad platform, parse that instead.

Phase 1: Ad Inventory

Parse the provided ads into:

Ad IDPlatformHeadlineBody/DescriptionCTALanding Page URLConv Rate (if known)

Phase 2: Landing Page Audit

For each unique landing page URL, fetch the page content:

fetch_webpage: [landing_page_url]

If fetch_webpage is not available, use curl to retrieve the page HTML.

Extract and score:

2A: Content Elements

ElementFound?Content
Hero headline[Y/N]"[Text]"
Subheadline[Y/N]"[Text]"
Primary CTA[Y/N]"[Button text]"
CTA above fold[Y/N]
Social proof[Y/N][Logos / testimonials / metrics]
Benefit list[Y/N][Key benefits listed]
Form / Sign-up[Y/N][Field count: N]
Video[Y/N]
Trust signals[Y/N][Security badges, guarantees]

2B: Message Match Scoring

For each ad → landing page pair, score on:

DimensionScore (1-10)Criteria
Promise continuity[X]Does the LP headline deliver on the ad's promise?
Language match[X]Does the LP use the same words/phrases as the ad?
Visual continuity[X]Does the LP feel like a continuation of the ad? (Not assessable for search)
CTA alignment[X]Does the LP's ask match what the ad implied?
Specificity match[X]If the ad was specific ("for sales teams"), is the LP specific too?
Emotional match[X]If the ad used fear/urgency, does the LP carry that forward?

Message Match Score: [Average/60]

Scoring Guide

ScoreRatingMeaning
50-60ExcellentStrong match — LP delivers on every ad promise
40-49GoodMinor disconnects but overall coherent
30-39Needs workNoticeable gaps — visitor has to hunt for relevance
20-29PoorAd and LP feel like different products
Below 20CriticalComplete mismatch — fix immediately

Phase 3: Conversion Friction Analysis

Beyond message match, assess landing page conversion friction:

Friction TypeCheckStatus
Load timeDoes the page feel heavy/slow? (Asset count proxy)[Fast/Slow/Unknown]
Form lengthHow many fields before conversion?[N fields] — [Appropriate/Too many]
CTA clarityIs there one clear CTA or competing actions?[Clear/Cluttered]
Above-fold conversionCan someone convert without scrolling?[Yes/No]
Social proof placementIs proof near the CTA?[Yes/No]
Navigation distractionDoes the LP have full site nav? (Should be minimal)[Minimal/Full nav]
Mobile experienceAny mobile-unfriendly elements?[Good/Issues]

Phase 4: Output Format

# Ad-to-Landing Page Audit — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Ads audited: [N]
Unique landing pages: [N]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Overall message match: [Score/60] — [Rating]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-4 sentences: Overall finding, biggest disconnect, top recommendation, estimated conversion impact]

---

## Audit Results by Ad → Landing Page Pair

### Ad 1: "[Ad headline excerpt]"
**Platform:** [Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn]
**Ad copy:**
> Headline: "[text]"
> Body: "[text]"
> CTA: "[text]"

**Landing page:** [URL]
> LP headline: "[text]"
> LP subhead: "[text]"
> LP CTA: "[button text]"

**Message Match Score: [X/60] — [Rating]**

| Dimension | Score | Issue |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Promise continuity | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Language match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| CTA alignment | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Specificity match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Emotional match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |

**Disconnect found:** [Specific description of mismatch]
**Recommended fix:** [Specific change to ad or LP]

### Ad 2: ...

---

## Landing Page Friction Report

### [Landing Page URL]
| Friction Point | Status | Impact | Fix |
|---------------|--------|--------|-----|
| [Friction] | [Red/Yellow/Green] | [High/Med/Low] | [Specific fix] |

---

## Priority Fixes

### Critical (Fix This Week)
1. **[Ad/LP pair]:** [Specific mismatch] → [Specific fix]
   - Est. conversion impact: [X% improvement]

### Important (Fix This Month)
2. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

### Nice-to-Have
3. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

---

## Rewrite Suggestions

### For [Ad or LP with worst match]:

**Current ad headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested ad headline:** "[rewrite that matches LP]"

OR

**Current LP headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested LP headline:** "[rewrite that matches ad]"

Save to ad-lp-audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Landing page fetchingFree
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • fetch_webpage or curl — for landing page analysis
  • No API keys required

Trigger Phrases

  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page match"
  • "Why is my conversion rate so low?"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "Do our landing pages match our ads?"
  • "Run a CRO audit on our ad funnels"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.95%
按下载量换算23

Claude

32.57%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

17.14%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

9.84%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills